Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Accid Anal Prev ; 42(2): 676-88, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20159094

RESUMO

A common technique used for the calibration of collision prediction models is the Generalized Linear Modeling (GLM) procedure with the assumption of Negative Binomial or Poisson error distribution. In this technique, fixed coefficients that represent the average relationship between the dependent variable and each explanatory variable are estimated. However, the stationary relationship assumed may hide some important spatial factors of the number of collisions at a particular traffic analysis zone. Consequently, the accuracy of such models for explaining the relationship between the dependent variable and the explanatory variables may be suspected since collision frequency is likely influenced by many spatially defined factors such as land use, demographic characteristics, and traffic volume patterns. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the spatial variations in the relationship between the number of zonal collisions and potential transportation planning predictors, using the Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression modeling technique. The secondary objective is to build on knowledge comparing the accuracy of Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression models to that of Generalized Linear Models. The results show that the Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression models are useful for capturing spatially dependent relationships and generally perform better than the conventional Generalized Linear Models.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Planejamento Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Estatísticos , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Distribuição de Poisson
2.
Accid Anal Prev ; 38(3): 579-89, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16414003

RESUMO

This paper examines the temporal transferability of the zonal accident prediction models by using appropriate evaluation measures of predictive performance to assess whether the relationship between the dependent and independent variables holds reasonably well across time. The two temporal contexts are the years 1996 and 2001, with updated 1996 models being used to predict 2001 accidents in each traffic zone of the City of Toronto. The paper examines alternative updating methods for temporal transfer by imagining that only a sample of 2001 data is available. The sensitivity of the performance of the updated models to the 2001 sample size is explored. The updating procedures examined include the Bayesian updating approach and the application of calibration factors to the 1996 models. Models calibrated for the 2001 samples were also explored, but were found to be inadequate. The results show that the models are not transferable in a strict statistical sense. However, relative measures of transferability indicate that the transferred models yield useful information in the application context. Also, it is concluded that the updated accident models using the calibration factors produce better results for predicting the number of accidents in the year 2001 than using the Bayesian approach.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Condução de Veículo , Planejamento em Saúde , Medição de Risco , Segurança , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Teorema de Bayes , Geografia , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...