Citrate 4% versus heparin and the reduction of thrombosis study (CHARTS).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Citrate 4% has antithrombotic and antibacterial properties, which makes it a potentially superior alternative to heparin as an indwelling intraluminal locking agent. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Sixty-one prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients dialyzing with a tunneled cuffed HD catheter were randomized in a pilot study to receive either heparin 5000 U/ml or citrate 4% as a locking agent after HD. The primary outcomes were the development of catheter dysfunction (defined as a blood pump speed <250 ml/min or the use of tissue plasminogen activator) and catheter-associated bacteremia. The secondary outcomes were the development of an exit-site infection or bleeding complications (either local or systemic). RESULTS: Citrate had comparable catheter dysfunction episodes to heparin (13/32 [41%] cases versus 12/29 [41%] cases, respectively). There were no differences in the development of catheter-associated bacteremia (2.2/1000 catheter days citrate versus 3.3/1000 catheter days heparin group; P = 0.607) or exit-site infection (2.2/1000 catheter days for both groups). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings from our pilot study demonstrate that 4% citrate is effective in maintaining catheter patency and does not appear to have any increased incidence of infections. Because citrate is significantly cheaper and has a more favorable side effect profile than heparin, it can be considered a potentially better locking agent in HD catheters.

Short and long alteplase dwells in dysfunctional hemodialysis catheters.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis catheter dysfunction (CD) is the inability to attain adequate blood pump speeds (BPS) and is attributed to thrombus or catheter malposition; alteplase (TPA) is often given in a variety of dwell times to treat CD. The purpose of this study was to determine if TPA dwell time affects short- or long-term catheter patency rates. METHODS: Sixty hemodialysis (HD) patients with CD, as defined by BPS of < 250 mL/min, were randomized to receive either 1- or > 48-hr (to subsequent HD run) TPA dwell. The primary outcomes were catheter patency (BPS of > 250 mL/min) at the subsequent HD run and catheter patency at 2 weeks. The secondary outcome was the time from study entry to the next catheter intervention (including subsequent TPA installation). RESULTS: After TPA installation, a 78% overall catheter patency rate was observed at the subsequent HD run, falling to 48% patency at 2 weeks. There is no statistically significant difference between the short and long TPA dwell groups for catheter patency at the subsequent HD run (76.9% vs. 79.4%) or at 2 weeks (42.3% vs. 52.9%). Multivariate analysis demonstrates that the use of TPA on two or more previous occasions is a predictor of TPA failure both at the subsequent HD run and at 2 weeks. TPA installation achieves a median catheter function time of only 14 days, after which CD reoccurs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although patency for the next HD run can be achieved with either short or long TPA dwell, neither is reliable in terms of long-term patency. Strategies that employ TPA for CD are temporary and allow a 2-week window during which more definitive therapies for HD access should be sought.