Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 24(3): 843-53, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15886180

RESUMO

Payers, accreditors, and consumers are using quality improvement (QI) methods, but little is known about whether physicians do so. The results from this 2003 national physician survey indicate that most do not. Physicians do not routinely use data for assessing their performance and are reluctant to share those data. They infrequently participate in redesign activities. Physicians in larger and salaried groups are more likely to be engaged in QI. The science of QI has been "institutionalized" but not yet "professionalized."Accelerating physicians' adoption of and participation in QI requires building the infrastructure to support quality and paying attention to professionalism, knowledge, and skills.


Assuntos
Papel do Médico , Gestão da Qualidade Total , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cultura Organizacional , Estados Unidos
2.
MedGenMed ; 6(4): 2, 2004 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15775829

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Physicians in the United States are only slowly adopting information technology (IT) tools, despite studies demonstrating their clinical benefits. More is known about IT use within institutional settings than by individual physicians. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates physicians' current use of, future plans for, and perceived barriers to adopting electronic medical records (EMRs), computerized prescribing and order entry, clinical decision support systems, and electronic communication (email) with other physicians and with patients. DESIGN: Self-administered mail surveys were completed between March and May 2003 among a national random sample of physicians involved in direct patient care of adults. A total of 1837 surveys were returned for a response rate of 52.8%. RESULTS: Physicians most commonly use IT for billing. For clinical management, the most common tool is computerized access to laboratory results (59%). Other tools are less prevalent: Twenty-seven percent of respondents use EMRs routinely or occasionally; 27% prescribe or order tests electronically; and 12% receive electronic alerts about potential drug-prescribing problems. Only 24% of surveyed physicians practice in a "high-tech" office setting. Physicians in groups of 50 or more are significantly more likely to use any IT tools and to practice in a high-tech office, as compared with physicians in solo practice (odds ratio = 7.7). The top 3 barriers to adoption of IT are start-up costs (56%), lack of uniform standards (44%), and lack of time (39%). CONCLUSION: Most physicians do not use EMRs and related technologies. Adoption is uneven, and a technologic divide exists between physicians depending on their practice environment and mode of compensation. Cost remains the most important barrier to adoption. Attention needs to be focused on policies and business models that will make IT tools accessible and affordable to all physicians.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação/tendências , Médicos , Tecnologia/tendências , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Demografia , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Correio Eletrônico , Sistemas de Informação/economia , Sistemas de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Prontuários Médicos , Miniaturização , Padrões de Prática Médica , Tecnologia/economia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...