Deep Learning-Enabled Quantification of 99mTc-Pyrophosphate SPECT/CT for Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR CA) is increasingly recognized as a cause of heart failure in older patients, with 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging frequently used to establish the diagnosis. Visual interpretation of SPECT images is the gold standard for interpretation but is inherently subjective. Manual quantitation of SPECT myocardial 99mTc-pyrophosphate activity is time-consuming and not performed clinically. We evaluated a deep learning approach for fully automated volumetric quantitation of 99mTc-pyrophosphate using segmentation of coregistered anatomic structures from CT attenuation maps. Methods: Patients who underwent SPECT/CT 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging for suspected ATTR CA were included. Diagnosis of ATTR CA was determined using standard criteria. Cardiac chambers and myocardium were segmented from CT attenuation maps using a foundational deep learning model and then applied to attenuation-corrected SPECT images to quantify radiotracer activity. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of target-to-background ratio (TBR), cardiac pyrophosphate activity (CPA), and volume of involvement (VOI) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We then evaluated associations with the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. Results: In total, 299 patients were included (median age, 76 y), with ATTR CA diagnosed in 83 (27.8%) patients. CPA (AUC, 0.989; 95% CI, 0.974-1.00) and VOI (AUC, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.973-1.00) had the highest prediction performance for ATTR CA. The next highest AUC was for TBR (AUC, 0.979; 95% CI, 0.964-0.995). The AUC for CPA was significantly higher than that for heart-to-contralateral ratio (AUC, 0.975; 95% CI, 0.952-0.998; P = 0.046). Twenty-three patients with ATTR CA experienced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. All methods for establishing TBR, CPA, and VOI were associated with an increased risk of events after adjustment for age, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.41 to 1.84 per SD increase. Conclusion: Deep learning segmentation of coregistered CT attenuation maps is not affected by the pattern of radiotracer uptake and allows for fully automatic quantification of hot-spot SPECT imaging such as 99mTc-pyrophosphate. This approach can be used to accurately identify patients with ATTR CA and may play a role in risk prediction.

Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction.

Background: While low-dose computed tomography scans are traditionally used for attenuation correction in hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), they also contain additional anatomic and pathologic information not utilized in clinical assessment. We seek to uncover the full potential of these scans utilizing a holistic artificial intelligence (AI)-driven image framework for image assessment. Methods: Patients with SPECT/CT MPI from 4 REFINE SPECT registry sites were studied. A multi-structure model segmented 33 structures and quantified 15 radiomics features for each on CT attenuation correction (CTAC) scans. Coronary artery calcium and epicardial adipose tissue scores were obtained from separate deep-learning models. Normal standard quantitative MPI features were derived by clinical software. Extreme Gradient Boosting derived all-cause mortality risk scores from SPECT, CT, stress test, and clinical features utilizing a 10-fold cross-validation regimen to separate training from testing data. The performance of the models for the prediction of all-cause mortality was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Results: Of 10,480 patients, 5,745 (54.8%) were male, and median age was 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 57-73) years. During the median follow-up of 2.9 years (1.6-4.0), 651 (6.2%) patients died. The AUC for mortality prediction of the model (combining CTAC, MPI, and clinical data) was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [0.74-0.87]), which was higher than that of an AI CTAC model (0.78 [0.71-0.85]), and AI hybrid model (0.79 [0.72-0.86]) incorporating CTAC and MPI data (p<0.001 for all). Conclusion: In patients with normal perfusion, the comprehensive model (0.76 [0.65-0.86]) had significantly better performance than the AI CTAC (0.72 [0.61-0.83]) and AI hybrid (0.73 [0.62-0.84]) models (p<0.001, for all).CTAC significantly enhances AI risk stratification with MPI SPECT/CT beyond its primary role - attenuation correction. A comprehensive multimodality approach can significantly improve mortality prediction compared to MPI information alone in patients undergoing cardiac SPECT/CT.

Artificial Intelligence Predicts Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure Exacerbation in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide, with a high associated economic burden. This study aimed to assess whether artificial intelligence models incorporating clinical, stress test, and imaging parameters could predict hospitalization for acute HF exacerbation in patients undergoing SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Methods: The HF risk prediction model was developed using data from 4,766 patients who underwent SPECT/CT at a single center (internal cohort). The algorithm used clinical risk factors, stress variables, SPECT imaging parameters, and fully automated deep learning-generated calcium scores from attenuation CT scans. The model was trained and validated using repeated hold-out (10-fold cross-validation). External validation was conducted on a separate cohort of 2,912 patients. During a median follow-up of 1.9 y, 297 patients (6%) in the internal cohort were admitted for HF exacerbation. Results: The final model demonstrated a higher area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (0.87 ± 0.03) for predicting HF admissions than did stress left ventricular ejection fraction (0.73 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001) or a model developed using only clinical parameters (0.81 ± 0.04, P < 0.0001). These findings were confirmed in the external validation cohort (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve: 0.80 ± 0.04 for final model, 0.70 ± 0.06 for stress left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.72 ± 0.05 for clinical model; P < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: Integrating SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging into an artificial intelligence-based risk assessment algorithm improves the prediction of HF hospitalization. The proposed method could enable early interventions to prevent HF hospitalizations, leading to improved patient care and better outcomes.

Predicting mortality from AI cardiac volumes mass and coronary calcium on chest computed tomography.

Chest computed tomography is one of the most common diagnostic tests, with 15 million scans performed annually in the United States. Coronary calcium can be visualized on these scans, but other measures of cardiac risk such as atrial and ventricular volumes have classically required administration of contrast. Here we show that a fully automated pipeline, incorporating two artificial intelligence models, automatically quantifies coronary calcium, left atrial volume, left ventricular mass, and other cardiac chamber volumes in 29,687 patients from three cohorts. The model processes chamber volumes and coronary artery calcium with an end-to-end time of ~18 s, while failing to segment only 0.1% of cases. Coronary calcium, left atrial volume, and left ventricular mass index are independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and significantly improve risk classification compared to identification of abnormalities by a radiologist. This automated approach can be integrated into clinical workflows to improve identification of abnormalities and risk stratification, allowing physicians to improve clinical decision-making.

AI-Defined Cardiac Anatomy Improves Risk Stratification of Hybrid Perfusion Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) improves perfusion quantification of hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging by correcting for attenuation artifacts. Artificial intelligence (AI) can automatically measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) from CTAC to improve risk prediction but could potentially derive additional anatomic features. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated AI-based derivation of cardiac anatomy from CTAC and assessed its added prognostic utility. METHODS: The authors considered consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 separate centers. Previously validated AI models were used to segment CAC and cardiac structures (left atrium, left ventricle, right atrium, right ventricular volume, and left ventricular [LV] mass) from CTAC. They evaluated associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which included death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or revascularization. RESULTS: In total, 7,613 patients were included with a median age of 64 years. During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (IQR: 1.3-3.4 years), MACEs occurred in 1,045 (13.7%) patients. Fully automated AI processing took an average of 6.2 ± 0.2 seconds for CAC and 15.8 ± 3.2 seconds for cardiac volumes and LV mass. Patients in the highest quartile of LV mass and left atrium, LV, right atrium, and right ventricular volume were at significantly increased risk of MACEs compared to patients in the lowest quartile, with HR ranging from 1.46 to 3.31. The addition of all CT-based volumes and CT-based LV mass improved the continuous net reclassification index by 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: AI can automatically derive LV mass and cardiac chamber volumes from CT attenuation imaging, significantly improving cardiovascular risk assessment for hybrid perfusion imaging.

AI-derived epicardial fat measurements improve cardiovascular risk prediction from myocardial perfusion imaging.

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and attenuation are associated with cardiovascular risk, but manual annotation is time-consuming. We evaluated whether automated deep learning-based EAT measurements from ungated computed tomography (CT) are associated with death or myocardial infarction (MI). We included 8781 patients from 4 sites without known coronary artery disease who underwent hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging. Of those, 500 patients from one site were used for model training and validation, with the remaining patients held out for testing (n = 3511 internal testing, n = 4770 external testing). We modified an existing deep learning model to first identify the cardiac silhouette, then automatically segment EAT based on attenuation thresholds. Deep learning EAT measurements were obtained in <2 s compared to 15 min for expert annotations. There was excellent agreement between EAT attenuation (Spearman correlation 0.90 internal, 0.82 external) and volume (Spearman correlation 0.90 internal, 0.91 external) by deep learning and expert segmentation in all 3 sites (Spearman correlation 0.90-0.98). During median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.6-4.9), 565 patients experienced death or MI. Elevated EAT volume and attenuation were independently associated with an increased risk of death or MI after adjustment for relevant confounders. Deep learning can automatically measure EAT volume and attenuation from low-dose, ungated CT with excellent correlation with expert annotations, but in a fraction of the time. EAT measurements offer additional prognostic insights within the context of hybrid perfusion imaging.

Automated vessel-specific coronary artery calcification quantification with deep learning in a large multi-centre registry.

AIMS: Vessel-specific coronary artery calcification (CAC) is additive to global CAC for prognostic assessment. We assessed accuracy and prognostic implications of vessel-specific automated deep learning (DL) CAC analysis on electrocardiogram (ECG) gated and attenuation correction (AC) computed tomography (CT) in a large multi-centre registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Vessel-specific CAC was assessed in the left main/left anterior descending (LM/LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) using a DL model trained on 3000 gated CT and tested on 2094 gated CT and 5969 non-gated AC CT. Vessel-specific agreement was assessed with linear weighted Cohen's Kappa for CAC zero, 1-100, 101-400, and >400 Agatston units (AU). Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was assessed during 2.4 ± 1.4 years follow-up, with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There was strong to excellent agreement between DL and expert ground truth for CAC in LM/LAD, LCX and RCA on gated CT [0.90 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.92); 0.70 (0.68 to 0.73); 0.79 (0.77 to 0.81)] and AC CT [0.78 (0.77 to 0.80); 0.60 (0.58 to 0.62); 0.70 (0.68 to 0.71)]. MACE occurred in 242 (12%) undergoing gated CT and 841(14%) of undergoing AC CT. LM/LAD CAC >400 AU was associated with the highest risk of MACE on gated (HR 12.0, 95% CI 7.96, 18.0, P < 0.001) and AC CT (HR 4.21, 95% CI 3.48, 5.08, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Vessel-specific CAC assessment with DL can be performed accurately and rapidly on gated CT and AC CT and provides important prognostic information.

Clinical phenotypes among patients with normal cardiac perfusion using unsupervised learning: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is one of the most common cardiac scans and is used for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and assessment of cardiovascular risk. However, the large majority of MPI patients have normal results. We evaluated whether unsupervised machine learning could identify unique phenotypes among patients with normal scans and whether those phenotypes were associated with risk of death or myocardial infarction. METHODS: Patients from a large international multicenter MPI registry (10 sites) with normal perfusion by expert visual interpretation were included in this cohort analysis. The training population included 9849 patients, and external testing population 12,528 patients. Unsupervised cluster analysis was performed, with separate training and external testing cohorts, to identify clusters, with four distinct phenotypes. We evaluated the clinical and imaging features of clusters and their associations with death or myocardial infarction. FINDINGS: Patients in Clusters 1 and 2 almost exclusively underwent exercise stress, while patients in Clusters 3 and 4 mostly required pharmacologic stress. In external testing, the risk for Cluster 4 patients (20.2% of population, unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 6.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.64-8.20) was higher than the risk associated with pharmacologic stress (HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.53-3.63), or previous myocardial infarction (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.40-2.36). INTERPRETATION: Unsupervised learning identified four distinct phenotypes of patients with normal perfusion scans, with a significant proportion of patients at very high risk of myocardial infarction or death. Our results suggest a potential role for patient phenotyping to improve risk stratification of patients with normal imaging results. FUNDING: This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health [R35HL161195 to PS]. The REFINE SPECT database was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health [R01HL089765 to PS]. MCW was supported by the British Heart Foundation [FS/ICRF/20/26002].

Artificial intelligence-based automated left ventricular mass quantification from non-contrast cardiac CT scans: correlation with contrast CT and cardiac MRI.

Background: Non-contrast CT scans are not used for evaluating left ventricle myocardial mass (LV mass), which is typically evaluated with contrast CT or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the feasibility of LV mass estimation from standard, ECG-gated, non-contrast CT using an artificial intelligence (AI) approach and compare it with coronary CT angiography (CTA) and cardiac MRI. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent coronary CTA, which included non-contrast CT calcium scanning and contrast CTA, and cardiac MRI. The median interval between coronary CTA and MRI was 22 days (IQR: 3-76). We utilized an nn-Unet AI model that automatically segmented non-contrast CT structures. AI measurement of LV mass was compared to contrast CTA and MRI. Results: A total of 316 patients (Age: 57.1±16.7, 56% male) were included. The AI segmentation took on average 22 seconds per case. An excellent correlation was observed between AI and contrast CTA LV mass measures (r=0.84, p<0.001), with no significant differences (136.5±55.3 vs. 139.6±56.9 g, p=0.133). Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias of 2.9. When compared to MRI, measured LV mass was higher with AI (136.5±55.3 vs. 127.1±53.1 g, p<0.001). There was an excellent correlation between AI and MRI (r=0.85, p<0.001), with a small bias (-9.4). There were no statistical differences between the correlations of LV mass between contrast CTA and MRI, or AI and MRI. Conclusions: The AI-based automated estimation of LV mass from non-contrast CT demonstrated excellent correlations and minimal biases when compared to contrast CTA and MRI.

Comparison of the prognostic value between quantification and visual estimation of coronary calcification from attenuation CT in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

We investigated the prognostic utility of visually estimated coronary artery calcification (VECAC) from low dose computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans obtained during SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and assessed how it compares to coronary artery calcifications (CAC) quantified by calcium score on CTACs (QCAC). From the REFINE SPECT Registry 4,236 patients without prior coronary stenting with SPECT/CT performed at a single center were included (age: 64 ± 12 years, 47% female). VECAC in each coronary artery (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right) were scored separately as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), yielding a possible score of 0-12 for each patient (overall VECAC grade zero:0, mild:1-2, moderate: 3-5, severe: >5). CAC scoring of CTACs was performed at the REFINE SPECT core lab with dedicated software. VECAC was correlated with categorized QCAC (zero: 0, mild: 1-99, moderate: 100-399, severe: ≥400). A high degree of correlation was observed between VECAC and QCAC, with 73% of VECACs in the same category as QCAC and 98% within one category. There was substantial agreement between VECAC and QCAC (weighted kappa: 0.78 with 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.79, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 25 months, 372 patients (9%) experienced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In survival analysis, both VECAC and QCAC were associated with MACE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 2-year-MACE was similar for VECAC when compared to QCAC (0.694 versus 0.691, p = 0.70). In conclusion, visual assessment of CAC on low-dose CTAC scans provides good estimation of QCAC in patients undergoing SPECT/CT MPI. Visually assessed CAC has similar prognostic value for MACE in comparison to QCAC.

CT attenuation correction improves quantitative risk prediction by cardiac SPECT in obese patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the predictive value of CT attenuation-corrected stress total perfusion deficit (AC-sTPD) and non-corrected stress TPD (NC-sTPD) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in obese patients undergoing cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: The study included 4,585 patients who underwent CZT SPECT/CT MPI for clinical indications (chest pain: 56%, shortness of breath: 13%, other: 32%) at Yale New Haven Hospital (age: 64 ± 12 years, 45% female, body mass index [BMI]: 30.0 ± 6.3 kg/m2, prior coronary artery disease: 18%). The association between AC-sTPD or NC-sTPD and MACE defined as the composite end point of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or late coronary revascularization (> 90 days after SPECT) was evaluated with survival analysis. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 25 months, 453 patients (10%) experienced MACE. In patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (n = 931), those with AC-sTPD ≥ 3% had worse MACE-free survival than those with AC-sTPD < 3% (HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.40 - 3.55, p = 0.002) with no difference in MACE-free survival between patients with NC-sTPD ≥ 3% and NC-sTPD < 3% (HR:1.06, 95% CI:0.67 - 1.68, p = 0.78). AC-sTPD had higher AUC than NC-sTPD for the detection of 2-year MACE in patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (0.631 versus 0.541, p = 0.01). In the overall cohort AC-sTPD had a higher ROC area under the curve (AUC, 0.641) than NC-sTPD (0.608; P = 0.01) for detection of 2-year MACE. In patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 AC sTPD provided significant incremental prognostic value beyond NC sTPD (net reclassification index: 0.14 [95% CI: 0.20 - 0.28]). CONCLUSIONS: AC sTPD outperformed NC sTPD in predicting MACE in patients undergoing SPECT MPI with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. These findings highlight the superior prognostic value of AC-sTPD in this patient population and underscore the importance of CT attenuation correction.

Time and event-specific deep learning for personalized risk assessment after cardiac perfusion imaging.

Standard clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has proven prognostic value for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, personalizing predictions to a specific event type and time interval is more challenging. We demonstrate an explainable deep learning model that predicts the time-specific risk separately for all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and revascularization directly from MPI and 15 clinical features. We train and test the model internally using 10-fold hold-out cross-validation (n = 20,418) and externally validate it in three separate sites (n = 13,988) with MACE follow-ups for a median of 3.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.6, 3.6). We evaluate the model using the cumulative dynamic area under receiver operating curve (cAUC). The best model performance in the external cohort is observed for short-term prediction - in the first six months after the scan, mean cAUC for ACS and all-cause death reaches 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.77) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.79), respectively. The model outperforms conventional perfusion abnormality measures at all time points for the prediction of death in both internal and external validations, with improvement increasing gradually over time. Individualized patient explanations are visualized using waterfall plots, which highlight the contribution degree and direction for each feature. This approach allows the derivation of individual event probability as a function of time as well as patient- and event-specific risk explanations that may help draw attention to modifiable risk factors. Such a method could help present post-scan risk assessments to the patient and foster shared decision-making.

Unsupervised learning to characterize patients with known coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

PURPOSE: Patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) comprise a heterogenous population with varied clinical and imaging characteristics. Unsupervised machine learning can identify new risk phenotypes in an unbiased fashion. We use cluster analysis to risk-stratify patients with known CAD undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: From 37,298 patients in the REFINE SPECT registry, we identified 9221 patients with known coronary artery disease. Unsupervised machine learning was performed using clinical (23), acquisition (17), and image analysis (24) parameters from 4774 patients (internal cohort) and validated with 4447 patients (external cohort). Risk stratification for all-cause mortality was compared to stress total perfusion deficit (< 5%, 5-10%, ≥10%). RESULTS: Three clusters were identified, with patients in Cluster 3 having a higher body mass index, more diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and less likely to be male, have dyslipidemia, or undergo exercise stress imaging (p < 0.001 for all). In the external cohort, during median follow-up of 2.6 [0.14, 3.3] years, all-cause mortality occurred in 312 patients (7%). Cluster analysis provided better risk stratification for all-cause mortality (Cluster 3: hazard ratio (HR) 5.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0, 8.6, p < 0.001; Cluster 2: HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.5, 4.5, p < 0.001; Cluster 1, reference) compared to stress total perfusion deficit (≥10%: HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.5 p < 0.001; < 5%: reference). CONCLUSIONS: Our unsupervised cluster analysis in patients with known CAD undergoing SPECT MPI identified three distinct phenotypic clusters and predicted all-cause mortality better than ischemia alone.

Deep Learning of Coronary Calcium Scores From PET/CT Attenuation Maps Accurately Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) by computed tomographic (CT) imaging provides an accurate measure of atherosclerotic burden. CAC is also visible in computed tomographic attenuation correction (CTAC) scans, always acquired with cardiac positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a deep-learning (DL) model capable of fully automated CAC definition from PET CTAC scans. METHODS: The novel DL model, originally developed for video applications, was adapted to rapidly quantify CAC. The model was trained using 9,543 expert-annotated CT scans and was tested in 4,331 patients from an external cohort undergoing PET/CT imaging with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (follow-up 4.3 years), including same-day paired electrocardiographically gated CAC scans available in 2,737 patients. MACE risk stratification in 4 CAC score categories (0, 1-100, 101-400, and >400) was analyzed and CAC scores derived from electrocardiographically gated CT scans (standard scores) by expert observers were compared with automatic DL scores from CTAC scans. RESULTS: Automatic DL scoring required <6 seconds per scan. DL CTAC scores provided stepwise increase in the risk for MACE across the CAC score categories (HR up to 3.2; P < 0.001). Net reclassification improvement of standard CAC scores over DL CTAC scores was nonsignificant (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.07). The negative predictive values for MACE of zero CAC with standard (85%) and DL CTAC (83%) CAC scores were similar (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: DL CTAC scores predict cardiovascular risk similarly to standard CAC scores quantified manually by experienced operators from dedicated electrocardiographically gated CAC scans and can be obtained almost instantly, with no changes to PET/CT scanning protocol.

Deep Learning Coronary Artery Calcium Scores from SPECT/CT Attenuation Maps Improve Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events.

Low-dose ungated CT attenuation correction (CTAC) scans are commonly obtained with SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Despite the characteristically low image quality of CTAC, deep learning (DL) can potentially quantify coronary artery calcium (CAC) from these scans in an automatic manner. We evaluated CAC quantification derived with a DL model, including correlation with expert annotations and associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: We trained a convolutional long short-term memory DL model to automatically quantify CAC on CTAC scans using 6,608 studies (2 centers) and evaluated the model in an external cohort of patients without known coronary artery disease (n = 2,271) obtained in a separate center. We assessed agreement between DL and expert annotated CAC scores. We also assessed associations between MACE (death, revascularization, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina) and CAC categories (0, 1-100, 101-400, or >400) for scores manually derived by experienced readers and scores obtained fully automatically by DL using multivariable Cox models (adjusted for age, sex, past medical history, perfusion, and ejection fraction) and net reclassification index. Results: In the external testing population, DL CAC was 0 in 908 patients (40.0%), 1-100 in 596 (26.2%), 100-400 in 354 (15.6%), and >400 in 413 (18.2%). Agreement in CAC category by DL CAC and expert annotation was excellent (linear weighted κ, 0.80), but DL CAC was obtained automatically in less than 2 s compared with about 2.5 min for expert CAC. DL CAC category was an independent risk factor for MACE with hazard ratios in comparison to a CAC of zero: CAC of 1-100 (2.20; 95% CI, 1.54-3.14; P < 0.001), CAC of 101-400 (4.58; 95% CI, 3.23-6.48; P < 0.001), and CAC of more than 400 (5.92; 95% CI, 4.27-8.22; P < 0.001). Overall, the net reclassification index was 0.494 for DL CAC, which was similar to expert annotated CAC (0.503). Conclusion: DL CAC from SPECT/CT attenuation maps agrees well with expert CAC annotations and provides a similar risk stratification but can be obtained automatically. DL CAC scores improved classification of a significant proportion of patients as compared with SPECT myocardial perfusion alone.

Integration of coronary artery calcium scoring from CT attenuation scans by machine learning improves prediction of adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has been previously applied for prognostication in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We evaluated whether including attenuation CT coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring improves ML prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing SPECT/CT MPI. METHODS: From the REFINE SPECT Registry 4770 patients with SPECT/CT performed at a single center were included (age: 64 ± 12 years, 45% female). ML algorithm (XGBoost) inputs were clinical risk factors, stress variables, SPECT imaging parameters, and expert-observer CAC scoring using CT attenuation correction scans performed to obtain CT attenuation maps. The ML model was trained and validated using tenfold hold-out validation. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves were analyzed for prediction of MACE. MACE-free survival was evaluated with standard survival analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 24.1 months, 475 patients (10%) experienced MACE. Higher area under the ROC curve for MACE was observed with ML when CAC scoring was included (CAC-ML score, 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.79) compared to ML without CAC (ML score, 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77, P = .005) and when compared to CAC score alone (0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.73, P < .001). Among clinical, imaging, and stress parameters, CAC score had highest variable importance for ML. On survival analysis patients with high CAC-ML score (> 0.091) had higher event rate when compared to patients with low CAC-ML score (hazard ratio 5.3, 95% CI 4.3-6.5, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Integration of attenuation CT CAC scoring improves the predictive value of ML risk score for MACE prediction in patients undergoing SPECT MPI.

Deep Learning-Based Attenuation Correction Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac SPECT.

To improve diagnostic accuracy, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) SPECT studies can use CT-based attenuation correction (AC). However, CT-based AC is not available for most SPECT systems in clinical use, increases radiation exposure, and is impacted by misregistration. We developed and externally validated a deep-learning model to generate simulated AC images directly from non-AC (NC) SPECT, without the need for CT. Methods: SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging was performed using 99mTc-sestamibi or 99mTc-tetrofosmin on contemporary scanners with solid-state detectors. We developed a conditional generative adversarial neural network that applies a deep learning model (DeepAC) to generate simulated AC SPECT images. The model was trained with short-axis NC and AC images performed at 1 site (n = 4,886) and was tested on patients from 2 separate external sites (n = 604). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the stress total perfusion deficit (TPD) obtained from NC, AC, and DeepAC images for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve. We also quantified the direct count change among AC, NC, and DeepAC images on a per-voxel basis. Results: DeepAC could be obtained in less than 1 s from NC images; area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for obstructive CAD was higher for DeepAC TPD (0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85) than for NC TPD (0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.78; P < 0.001) and similar to AC TPD (0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87; P = 0.196). The normalcy rate in the low-likelihood-of-coronary-disease population was higher for DeepAC TPD (70.4%) and AC TPD (75.0%) than for NC TPD (54.6%, P < 0.001 for both). The positive count change (increase in counts) was significantly higher for AC versus NC (median, 9.4; interquartile range, 6.0-14.2; P < 0.001) than for AC versus DeepAC (median, 2.4; interquartile range, 1.3-4.2). Conclusion: In an independent external dataset, DeepAC provided improved diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD, as compared with NC images, and this accuracy was similar to that of actual AC. DeepAC simplifies the task of artifact identification for physicians, avoids misregistration artifacts, and can be performed rapidly without the need for CT hardware and additional acquisitions.

Reproducibility of quantitative coronary calcium scoring from PET/CT attenuation maps: comparison to ECG-gated CT scans.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate inter-scan and inter-reader agreement of coronary calcium (CAC) scores obtained from dedicated, ECG-gated CAC scans (standard CAC scan) and ultra-low-dose, ungated computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans obtained routinely during cardiac PET/CT imaging. METHODS: From 2928 consecutive patients who underwent same-day 82Rb cardiac PET/CT and gated CAC scan in the same hybrid PET/CT scanning session, we have randomly selected 200 cases with no history of revascularization. Standard CAC scans and ungated CTAC scans were scored by two readers using quantitative clinical software. We assessed the agreement between readers and between two scan protocols in 5 CAC categories (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, and > 400) using Cohen's Kappa and concordance. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 70 (inter-quartile range: 63-77), and 46% were male. The inter-scan concordance index and Cohen's Kappa for readers 1 and 2 were 0.69; 0.75 (0.69, 0.81) and 0.72; 0.8 (0.75, 0.85) respectively. The inter-reader concordance index and Cohen's Kappa (95% confidence interval [CI]) was higher for standard CAC scans: 0.9 and 0.92 (0.89, 0.96), respectively, vs. for CTAC scans: 0.83 and 0.85 (0.79, 0.9) for CTAC scans (p = 0.02 for difference in Kappa). Most discordant readings between two protocols occurred for scans with low extent of calcification (CAC score < 100). CONCLUSION: CAC can be quantitatively assessed on PET CTAC maps with good agreement with standard scans, however with limited sensitivity for small lesions. CAC scoring of CTAC can be performed routinely without modification of PET protocol and added radiation dose.

Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic plaque quantification from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) enables accurate assessment of coronary artery disease burden and prognosis. We sought to develop and validate a deep learning system for CCTA-derived measures of plaque volume and stenosis severity. METHODS: This international, multicentre study included nine cohorts of patients undergoing CCTA at 11 sites, who were assigned into training and test sets. Data were retrospectively collected on patients with a wide range of clinical presentations of coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA between Nov 18, 2010, and Jan 25, 2019. A novel deep learning convolutional neural network was trained to segment coronary plaque in 921 patients (5045 lesions). The deep learning network was then applied to an independent test set, which included an external validation cohort of 175 patients (1081 lesions) and 50 patients (84 lesions) assessed by intravascular ultrasound within 1 month of CCTA. We evaluated the prognostic value of deep learning-based plaque measurements for fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (our primary outcome) in 1611 patients from the prospective SCOT-HEART trial, assessed as dichotomous variables using multivariable Cox regression analysis, with adjustment for the ASSIGN clinical risk score. FINDINGS: In the overall test set, there was excellent or good agreement, respectively, between deep learning and expert reader measurements of total plaque volume (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0·964) and percent diameter stenosis (ICC 0·879; both p<0·0001). When compared with intravascular ultrasound, there was excellent agreement for deep learning total plaque volume (ICC 0·949) and minimal luminal area (ICC 0·904). The mean per-patient deep learning plaque analysis time was 5·65 s (SD 1·87) versus 25·66 min (6·79) taken by experts. Over a median follow-up of 4·7 years (IQR 4·0-5·7), myocardial infarction occurred in 41 (2·5%) of 1611 patients from the SCOT-HEART trial. A deep learning-based total plaque volume of 238·5 mm3 or higher was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR] 5·36, 95% CI 1·70-16·86; p=0·0042) after adjustment for the presence of deep learning-based obstructive stenosis (HR 2·49, 1·07-5·50; p=0·0089) and the ASSIGN clinical risk score (HR 1·01, 0·99-1·04; p=0·35). INTERPRETATION: Our novel, externally validated deep learning system provides rapid measurements of plaque volume and stenosis severity from CCTA that agree closely with expert readers and intravascular ultrasound, and could have prognostic value for future myocardial infarction. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Miriam & Sheldon G Adelson Medical Research Foundation.