Relationship between nutritional status on admission to the intensive care unit and clinical outcomes.

AIM: To determine the prevalence of malnutrition on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the relationship between nutritional status on admission and clinical outcomes in adult critically ill patients. METHODS: This was a prospective study in an adult ICU. Patients with expected length of stay (LOS) >48 hours in ICU were assessed for nutritional status using the patient generated-subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) within 48 hours of admission to ICU. RESULTS: Primary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital LOS and length of mechanical ventilation. A total of 166 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were aged 59 ± 17 years on average with a mean BMI of 29 ± 7 kg/m2 and a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 19 ± 7. The prevalence of malnutrition in critically ill patients was 36% (n = 60). Mortality rate of malnourished patients was 9% (n = 15) compared to 7.8% (n = 13) in well-nourished patients (adjusted odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.03, P = .069). There was no difference in hospital mortality between malnourished patients and well-nourished patients (10.2% vs 10.2% adjusted odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-4.19, P = .096). There was no relationship between nutritional status and length of mechanical ventilation (3.0 vs 1.0 days, P = .382)or ICU LOS (4.7 vs 4.8 days, P = .59). Malnourished patients had a longer LOS in hospital than well-nourished patients (24 vs 17 days, P = .03). CONCLUSION: Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for increased hospital LOS.

A retrospective evaluation of nutrition support in relation to clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with an open abdomen.

BACKGROUND: Optimising nutrition support in critically ill patients with an open abdomen is challenging. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (i) quantify the amount and adequacy of nutrition support administered and (ii) determine any relationships that exist between mode of nutrition support delivery and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with an open abdomen. METHODS: A retrospective review of critically ill patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h with an open abdomen in a mixed quaternary referral intensive care unit. Enteral and parenteral nutrition (ml) administered daily to patients was recorded for up to 21 days. Length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and duration of mechanical ventilation (days) were reported. RESULTS: Thirty patients were studied [14 male, 68 y (15-90 y), body mass index 25 kg/m2 (11-51 kg/m2), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 20 (7-41), energy goal 1860 kcal/d (1250-2712 kcal/d)]. Patients received 55% (0-117%) of energy goal and 56% (0-105%) protein goal from either enteral or parenteral nutrition. When enteral nutrition was delivered alone or in combination with parenteral nutrition, patients received 48% (0-146%) of their energy and 59% (19-105%) of their protein goal. Patients fed parenteral nutrition, either alone or as supplementary to enteral nutrition (n = 18), received more energy when compared with those who only received enteral nutrition (n = 9) [65 (27-117) vs 49 (15-89) % energy goal, P = 0.025]. Parenteral nutrition was associated with an increased length of stay in hospital [63 (45-156) vs 45 (17-93) d, P = 0.037]. CONCLUSION: Patients with an open abdomen receive about half of their nutrition requirements when fed exclusively via the enteral route. Providing combination enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach nutritional goals may not result in better clinical outcomes for patients with an open abdomen.

Post-pyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients: Extending the scope of practice for Australian dietitians.

AIM: To determine whether the placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube (PPFT) can be taught safely and effectively to a critical care dietitian. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU). The intervention consisted of 19 attempts at post-pyloric intubation by the dietitian. The 10 'learning' attempts were performed by the dietitian under the direction of an experienced (having completed in excess of 50 successful tube placements) user. A subsequent nine 'consolidation' attempts were performed under the responsibility of the intensive care consultant on duty. The primary outcome measures were success (i.e. tip of the PPFT being visible in or distal to the duodenum on X-ray) and time (minutes) to PPFT placement. Patients were observed for adverse events per standard clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 19 post-pyloric tube placements were attempted in 18 patients (52 (23-70) years, ICU admission diagnoses: trauma n = 4; respiratory failure n = 3; and burns, pancreatitis and renal failure n = 2 each). No adverse events occurred. Most (75%) patients were sedated, and mechanically ventilated. Prokinetics were used to assist tube placement in 11% (2/19) of attempts, both of which were successful. Placement of PPFT was successful in 58% (11/19) of attempts. Whilst training, the success rate was 40% (4/10) compared with 78% (7/9) once training was consolidated (P = 0.17). In the successful attempts, the mean time to placement was 11.0 minutes (3.9-27.1 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: A dietitian can be trained to safely and successfully place PPFT in critically ill patients.

The prevention and reduction of weight loss in an acute tertiary care setting: protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge randomised cluster trial (the PRoWL project).

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition, with accompanying weight loss, is an unnecessary risk in hospitalised persons and often remains poorly recognised and managed. The study aims to evaluate a hospital-wide multifaceted intervention co-facilitated by clinical nurses and dietitians addressing the nutritional care of patients, particularly those at risk of malnutrition. Using the best available evidence on reducing and preventing unplanned weight loss, the intervention (introducing universal nutritional screening; the provision of oral nutritional supplements; and providing red trays and additional support for patients in need of feeding) will be introduced by local ward teams in a phased way in a large tertiary acute care hospital. METHODS/DESIGN: A pragmatic stepped wedge randomised cluster trial with repeated cross section design will be conducted. The unit of randomisation is the ward, with allocation by a random numbers table. Four groups of wards (n = 6 for three groups, n = 7 for one group) will be randomly allocated to each intervention time point over the trial. Two trained local facilitators (a nurse and dietitian for each group) will introduce the intervention. The primary outcome measure is change in patient's body weight, secondary patient outcomes are: length of stay, all-cause mortality, discharge destinations, readmission rates and ED presentations. Patient outcomes will be measured on one ward per group, with 20 patients measured per ward per time period by an unblinded researcher. Including baseline, measurements will be conducted at five time periods. Staff perspectives on the context of care will be measured with the Alberta Context Tool. DISCUSSION: Unplanned and unwanted weight loss in hospital is common. Despite the evidence and growing concern about hospital nutrition there are very few evaluations of system-wide nutritional implementation programs. This project will test the implementation of a nutritional intervention across one hospital system using a staged approach, which will allow sequential rolling out of facilitation and project support. This project is one of the first evidence implementation projects to use the stepped wedge design in acute care and we will therefore be testing the appropriateness of the stepped wedge design to evaluate such interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000020987.

Working together to improve the care of older people: a new framework for collaboration.

AIM: This paper is a report of a study identifying the care issues experienced by older people in the acute setting that could be improved through a collaborative approach to action. BACKGROUND: Actively involving consumers in the governance of healthcare organizations is viewed positively, although there is less agreement on how to do this. Co-operative inquiry is a useful approach to involve consumers and clinicians in structured dialogue about understanding and changing care, whereas traditional quality improvement methodologies are often singular in their dimensions of change. METHOD: Using a co-operative inquiry approach, five workshops were facilitated over a 4-month period in 2008 with four volunteer older people, four clinicians and three facilitators (n=11). All participants were actively involved in generating ideas and actions using a range of facilitation techniques and data collection methods. FINDINGS: There was increased awareness, understanding and acceptance of clinicians' and consumers' experiences and expectations of care. The complexity behind changing so-called simple care (providing warm drinks, appetizing food), which were the key concerns for consumers, relied on the active management and broader transformation of the system, including teamwork, communication processes and organizational and individual values and beliefs. CONCLUSION: Consumers and clinicians put different emphasis on perspectives related to improving care of older people in the acute hospital setting. The disconnect between what consumers viewed as 'simple' organizational behaviours to change and what the clinicians viewed as complex, led to a recognition that the approach to organizational change needs to be reconceptualized.