Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Manag Res ; 16: 385-393, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685982

RESUMO

Background: Studies have reported that blood transfusion may have an association with survival outcomes of cancer patients. This study was aimed at finding the effect of intra-operative blood transfusion on the prognosis of patients of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This was a retrospective study. HCC patients who underwent tumor resection from January 2013 to November 2018 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital were included. The survival time of patients receiving or not receiving blood transfusion during the operation were compared. Results: Of HCC patients, 21.1% (102/484) received intra-operative blood transfusion. After propensity score matching, 87 pairs of patients were included in the study. In the subset of patients with a tumor size of >4 cm, univariable analysis found that there were significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS; P=0.004) and overall survival (OS; P=0.028) between blood transfusion and non-blood transfusion groups. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, intra-operative blood transfusion was an independent risk factor for RFS (HR: 2.011, 95% CI: 1.146-3.529, P=0.015), but not for OS (HR: 1.862, 95% CI: 0.933-3.715, P=0.078) in the subset of patients with a tumor size of >4 cm. Conclusion: Intra-operative blood transfusion was associated with worse RFS in HCC patients with a tumor size of >4 cm.

2.
J Inflamm Res ; 17: 2159-2167, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38617385

RESUMO

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are inflammatory biomarkers. Until now, it is unknown the impact of opioid dosage on perioperative immunity in glioma patients. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of intraoperative opioid dosage on perioperative immune perturbations using NLR and LMR as inflammatory biomarkers and evaluate the correlation between inflammatory biomarkers and pathological grade of glioma. Methods: The study included 208 patients with primary glioma who underwent glioma resection from February 2012 to November 2019 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Complete blood count (CBC) was collected at 3 time points: one week before surgery, and 24 hours and one week after surgery. Patients were divided into high-dose and low-dose groups, based on the median value of intraoperative opioid dose. The relationships between perioperative NLR, LMR and intraoperative opioid dosage were analyzed using repeated measurement analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlations between preoperative various factors and pathological grade were analyzed by Spearman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to assess the predictive performance of the NLR and LMR for pathological grade. Results: The NLR (P=0.020) and lower LMR (P=0.037) were statistically significant different between high-dose and low-dose groups one week after surgery. The area under the curve (AUC) of the NLR to identify poor diagnosis was 0.685, which was superior to the LMR (AUC: 0.607) and indicated a correlation between the NLR with pathological grade. The preoperative NLR (P=0.000), LMR (P=0.009), age (P=0.000) and tumor size (P=0.001) exhibited a significant correlation with the pathological grade of glioma. Conclusion: Intraoperative opioids in the high-dose group were associated with higher NLR and lower LMR in postoperative glioma patients. The preoperative NLR and LMR demonstrated predictive value for distinguishing between high-grade and low-grade gliomas.

3.
J Inflamm Res ; 16: 5027-5037, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927957

RESUMO

Introduction: In most cases of pain related to abdominal tumors, increasing the dosage of analgesics still makes the pain difficult to alleviate. Splanchnic neurolysis is a new treatment option. However, not all patients receiving splanchnic neurolysis treatment will achieve satisfactory results. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the predictive value of preoperative serum immune indicators (white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets) for the efficacy of splanchnic neurolysis. Methods: The abdominal cancer patients (pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and renal cancer) admitted to the Department of Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2017 to October 2020 were collected. We evaluate the efficacy of splanchnic neurolysis by assessing the dosage of opioids and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of patients 24 to 48 hr before and after splanchnic neurolysis. The predictive value of preoperative serum immune indicators on the efficacy of splanchnic neurolysis was analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). Contract the Nomogram prediction model by R software. Results: We found that Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) has statistical significance for predicting splanchnic neurolysis efficacy in digestive system tumors. MPV and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) are independent predictors and have statistical significance in predicting splanchnic neurolysis efficacy in pancreatic cancer. The combination of MPV and NLR had satisfactory predictive value in pancreatic cancer (AUC = 0.715) and the nomogram model was constructed. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between lymphocyte count and NRS score, and a positive correlation between Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and NRS score. Discussion: The combined detection of MPV and NLR has important clinical predictive value for the postoperative efficacy of splanchnic neurolysis in pancreatic cancer.

4.
Cancer Med ; 11(24): 4927-4934, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35588234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative use of opioid analgesics might have an impact on cancer recurrence and survival after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the intra-operative fentanyl equivalents and survival outcomes in patients with primary liver cancer after receiving hepatectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study, and clinical data of 700 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2013 to August 2018 were reviewed. After propensity matching, 376 patients were included. Patients were divided into high-dose and low-dose groups according to the median intra-operative fentanyl equivalents (1.500 mg). Kaplan Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used. RESULTS: Results of univariable analysis showed there were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.136) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.444) between high-dose fentanyl equivalents and low-dose fentanyl equivalents group. The multivariable Cox regression analysis found that the dose of intra-operative fentanyl equivalents was not associated with RFS (HR: 1.119, 95%CI: 0.851-1.472, p = 0.422) or OS (HR: 0.939, 95%CI: 0.668-1.319, p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: The amounts of intra-operative fentanyl equivalents had no impact on recurrence-free or overall survival in patients with primary liver cancer after curative hepatectomy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Fentanila , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732474

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of CT-guided iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy in patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who were not suitable to receive radiotherapy. METHODS: A cohort of 68 patients with spinal metastasis induced pain not fully relieved by opioids and did not receive external beam radiation therapy due to poor general status were enrolled and underwent CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for analgesic treatment. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 8 weeks after brachytherapy. Mean Numerical Rating Scale score before brachytherapy was 7.3±1.3 and decreased to 3.3±0.9, 2.6±0.8, 2.7±0.8, 2.9±0.9 and 3.3±1.1 at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Daily dose of morphine equivalent was 105.1±28.0 mg before brachytherapy and decreased to 45.3±13.7, 39.9±14.2, 40.4±14.9, 48.5±18.0 and 62.4±17.5 mg at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Patients had fewer daily episodes of breakthrough pain after brachytherapy (p<0.001). Patients had improvement in pain-related functional interference and in hospital anxiety and depression score after brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is an effective and safe intervention for patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who are not able to receive radiation therapy.

6.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(12): 7611-7616, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131845

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Morphine infusion through Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) is widely used to relieve refractory cancer pain. However, continuous escalation of morphine dose caused by opioid tolerance and/or progress of cancer was commonly observed. Combining morphine with medications of different analgesic mechanisms is applied to blunt the rate of morphine increase. The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of combining gabapentin with morphine after IDDS implantation. METHODS: This study compared patients that received IDDS implantation from January 1, 2017 to November 10, 2018 in our institute. Key outcomes included change in mean pain score, dose of morphine used in patients, percentage of patients with 30% and 50% reduction in mean pain score, Patient Global Impression of Change scores, breakthrough pain characters and side effects. RESULTS: 34 patients in the combination group (morphine + gabapentin) and 40 patients in the monotherapy group(morphine)were analyzed. The results showed that both therapy groups achieved similar analgesic efficacy, demonstrated by Numerical rating scale (2.42 ± 0.88 vs 2.57 ± 0.85; Combination vs Monotherapy), PGIC and responder status. Mean daily dose of morphine was significantly lower in combination group compared to monotherapy group (3.54 ± 1.29 mg vs 4.64 ± 1.28 mg, P = 0.007). More patients experienced dizziness and somnolence after receiving combination therapy compared to morphine-alone treatment although no statistical significance was found (P = 0.49). CONCLUSION: Addition of gabapentin achieved similar analgesic efficacy with lower dose of morphine compared to morphine alone accompanying with higher incidence of dizziness and somnolence.


Assuntos
Dor do Câncer , Gabapentina , Morfina , Dor Intratável , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Gabapentina/efeitos adversos , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA