RESUMO
In problems relating to light propagation in biomedical tissues, the tissue is generally modeled as a turbid medium and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is employed to compute quantities such as diffuse reflectance, fluence, and transmittance. Two prescriptions are available in the literature for MC simulations. The first prescription considers all input quantities, including phase function, as an average over the particle size distribution, and the second prescription considers the phase function of each scatterer individually. The two prescriptions have been compared and contrasted in this paper for a given soft tissue model. It is demonstrated that, in general, the two recipes do not yield identical results. The source of this disagreement has been traced.
Assuntos
Luz , Método de Monte Carlo , Óptica e Fotônica , Animais , Simulação por Computador , Citoplasma/metabolismo , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Tamanho da Partícula , Imagens de Fantasmas , Probabilidade , Refratometria , Espalhamento de RadiaçãoRESUMO
The validity domain of a modified Born approximation (MBA) has been examined for the scattering of a pulsed plane wave (PPW). This new approximation has been compared with exact results and also with the conventional Born approximation (BA). Comparisons have been made for the scattering by a homogeneous sphere. Error charts have been presented for various scatterer sizes and acoustic properties for forward as well as back scattering. The pulse width has also been varied. Our study shows that the modified Born approximation is generally preferable to the conventional Born approximation in the forward direction. In the backward direction both approximations have a similar kind of validity domain. These observations are important in view of the fact that the Born approximation has been widely used in acoustic scattering problems.
