Suprarenal clamping is a safe method of aortic control when infrarenal clamping is not desirable.

We evaluated the safety of suprarenal aortic clamping in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated by open aortic replacement by retrospectively reviewing all patients who underwent elective AAA replacement at a university hospital from 1993 until 2003. We reviewed 249 patient charts and divided them into three groups according to the clamp location during aortic replacement: group 1, infrarenal clamp group (n = 185); group 2, suprarenal clamp group (n = 52); and group 3, supraceliac clamp group (n = 12). Groups 1 and 2 were compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative events, and postoperative events. Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test. Risk factors were comparable in groups 1 and 2 except for weight, which was higher in group 1. Intraoperative urine output, hypotensive episodes, and use of renal protective drugs were comparable in the two groups. Operation time, blood loss, and use of IV fluids were all significantly higher in group 2, while total aortic clamp time was higher in group 1. Postoperative events were comparable except for postoperative peak creatinine, intensive care unit length of stay, and postoperative length of stay, which were higher in group 2; however, discharge creatinine was comparable without a significant difference. Suprarenal clamping is a safe method of aortic control during open AAA replacement surgery. The selection of clamping site should be individualized according to the intraoperative anatomy. Supraceliac clamping is not necessarily the preferable method of aortic control when the infrarenal location is not suitable for clamping.

The resident view of professionalism behavior frequency in outstanding and "not outstanding" faculty.

BACKGROUND: Professionalism assessment has become necessary for all postgraduate training programs because it is now required for accreditation. To validate the novel items we generated to assess professionalism, we tested whether residents' ratings of faculty they judged as outstanding in professionalism would be distinguishable from those they judged as not outstanding. METHODS: Educators from core clinical disciplines generated 20 items assessing professionalism behaviors on a 7-point frequency scale anchored by "always" and "never." Thirty-five surgical and pediatric residents completed the form twice, anonymously rating 1 faculty member they judged as outstanding and another they judged as not outstanding. RESULTS: The residents produced 69 faculty ratings with means that differed significantly on all items between the outstanding and not-outstanding faculty. The form was highly unidimensional, with the primary factor's eigenvalue being 11.5 and Cronbach's alpha being 0.97. Groups differed most on items, ie, "listens well," "inspires trust," "answers questions directly," and "demonstrates respect for all." CONCLUSION: The behaviors that best distinguished clinical faculty judged by residents as outstanding professionals were listening, trustworthiness, answering directly, and respect.

Surgical thrombectomy: current role in thromboembolic occlusions.

Thromboembolic disease occurs in a heterogeneous group of patients with significant co-morbidities and variable presentations, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. To decrease these complications, multiple different endovascular modalities have been developed and used to treat this challenging problem. Physicians are now left with a broad array of endovascular and surgical options. Unfortunately, there are little data that accurately compare these modalities. Therefore, an individual approach to each patient with acute ischemia from thromboembolic disease must be employed. In order to tailor the treatment to the needs of each patient, the physician must be familiar with the techniques, complications, technology, and relative strengths and weaknesses of each treatment modality. This article will first outline the main technical considerations for performing surgical thromboembolectomy. The complications of operative thromboembolectomy will then be discussed followed by the data comparing operative and nonoperative therapy. Finally, clinical scenarios that are best treated by surgical intervention will be described.