Lack of Association of Initial Vasopressor Dosing with Survival and Cardiac Re-Arrest Likelihood After Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest occurs in approximately 350,000 patients outside the hospital and approximately 30,000 patients in the emergency department (ED) annually in the United States. When return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved, hypotension is a common complication. However, optimal dosing of vasopressors is not clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if initial vasopressor dosing was associated with cardiac re-arrest in patients after ROSC. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult patients experiencing cardiac arrest prior to arrival or within the ED. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on starting dose of vasopressor: low dose (LD; < 0.25 µg/kg/min), medium dose (MD; 0.25-0.49 µg/kg/min), high dose (HD; 0.5-0.99 µg/kg/min), and very high dose (VHD; ≥ 1 µg/kg/min). Data collection was performed primarily via manual chart review of medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiac re-arrest within 1 h of vasopressor initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify any covariates strongly associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS: No difference in cardiac re-arrest incidence was noted between groups. The VHD group was significantly more likely to require a second vasopressor (p = 0.003). The HD group had lower survival rates to hospital discharge compared with the LD and MD groups (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0147). In the multivariate regression, longer duration of pre-vasopressor re-arrests and hyperkalemic cardiac arrest etiology were significant predictors of cardiac re-arrest after vasopressor initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial vasopressor dosing was not found to be associated with risk of cardiac re-arrest or, conversely, risk of adverse events.

Immunogenicity of High Dose Influenza Vaccine for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-TNF Monotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) agents may have lower immune response to the influenza vaccine. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of the high dose (HD) vs standard dose (SD) influenza vaccine in patients with IBD on anti-TNF monotherapy. METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial at a single academic center evaluating the immunogenicity of the HD vs SD influenza vaccine in patients with IBD on anti-TNF monotherapy. Influenza antibody concentration was measured at immunization, at 2 to 4 weeks postimmunization, and at 6 months. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with IBD were recruited into the study, 40 on anti-TNF monotherapy, and 19 on vedolizumab, along with 20 healthy controls (HC). Patients with IBD receiving the HD influenza vaccine had significantly higher H3N2 postimmunization antibodies compared with those who received the SD influenza vaccine (160 [interquartile range 80 to 320] vs 80 [interquartile range 40 to 160]; P = 0.003). The H1N1 postimmunization levels were not significantly higher in the HD influenza vaccine (320 [interquartile range 150 to 320] vs 160 [interquartile range 80 to 320]; P = 0.18). Patients with IBD receiving the HD influenza vaccine and those on vedolizumab who received SD had equivalent antibody concentrations to HC (H1N1 P = 0.85; H3N2 P = 0.23; B/Victoria P = 0.20 and H1N1 P = 0.46; H3N2 P = 0.21; B/Victoria P = 1.00, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD on anti-TNF monotherapy receiving the HD influenza vaccine had significantly higher postimmunization antibody levels compared with SD vaccine. Clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02461758).