Lorlatinib and capmatinib in a ROS1-rearranged NSCLC with MET-driven resistance: tumor response and evolution.

Acquired drug resistance remains a major problem across oncogene-addicted cancers. Elucidation of mechanisms of resistance can inform rational treatment strategies for patients relapsing on targeted therapies while offering insights into tumor evolution. Here, we report acquired MET amplification as a resistance driver in a ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma after sequential treatment with ROS1 inhibitors. Subsequent combination therapy with lorlatinib plus capmatinib, a MET-selective inhibitor, induced intracranial and extracranial tumor response. At relapse, sequencing of the resistant tumor revealed a MET D1246N mutation and loss of MET amplification. We performed integrated molecular analyses of serial tumor and plasma samples, unveiling dynamic alterations in the ROS1 fusion driver and MET bypass axis at genomic and protein levels and the emergence of polyclonal resistance. This case illustrates the complexity of longitudinal tumor evolution with sequential targeted therapies, highlighting challenges embedded in the current precision oncology paradigm and the importance of developing approaches that prevent resistance.

Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor following complete surgical resection in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are one of the most common targetable oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing (ex19del or L858R) and T790M mutations and has superior CNS penetration. Osimertinib is approved in EGFR mutant stage IB-IIIA NSCLC following complete tumor resection. AREAS COVERED: This review opinion article summarizes the pivotal studies that led to the approval of current adjuvant therapies in NSCLC with the primary focus on EGFR-TKI osimertinib and outlines the future strategies in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and emerging novel roles of EGFR targeting therapies. The literature search has been performed using PubMed, Food and Drug Administration website, and Google search. EXPERT OPINION: Osimertinib showed significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival benefit compared to placebo in EGFR mutant stage IB-IIIA NSCLC following complete tumor resection. Whether this will lead to improvement in overall survival and the optimal length of treatment remain open questions and are much-debated topic in the lung cancer field.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2.

Background: Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients. Methods: In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Findings: Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment. Interpretation: This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of 2. Funding: AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.

High-Dose Osimertinib for CNS Progression in EGFR+ NSCLC: A Multi-Institutional Experience.

Introduction: This multicenter review evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib dose escalation for central nervous system (CNS) progression developing on osimertinib 80 mg in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Methods: Retrospective review identified 105 patients from eight institutions with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib 160 mg daily between October 2013 and January 2020. Radiographic responses were clinically assessed, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used. We defined CNS disease control as the interval from osimertinib 160 mg initiation to CNS progression or discontinuation of osimertinib 160 mg. Results: Among 105 patients treated with osimertinib 160 mg, 69 were escalated for CNS progression, including 24 treated with dose escalation alone (cohort A), 34 who received dose-escalated osimertinib plus concurrent chemotherapy and/or radiation (cohort B), and 11 who received osimertinib 160 mg without any prior 80 mg exposure. The median duration of CNS control was 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-5.8) in cohort A, 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.1-6.5) in cohort B, and 4.2 months (95% CI 1.6-not reached) in cohort C. Across all cohorts, the median duration of CNS control was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.0) in isolated leptomeningeal progression (n = 27) and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.0-3.1) among those with parenchymal-only metastases (n = 23). Patients on osimertinib 160 mg experienced no severe or unexpected side effects. Conclusion: Among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC experiencing CNS progression on osimertinib 80 mg daily, dose escalation to 160 mg provided modest benefit with CNS control lasting approximately 3 to 6 months and seemed more effective in patients with isolated leptomeningeal CNS progression.

INI-1 (SMARCB1)-Deficient Undifferentiated Sinonasal Carcinoma: Novel Paradigm of Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Sinonasal Malignancies.

Sinonasal tumors consist of a group of rare heterogeneous malignancies, accounting for 3%-5% of all head and neck cancers. Although squamous cell carcinomas make up a significant portion of cancers arising in the sinonasal tract, there are a variety of aggressive tumor types that can present with a poorly differentiated morphology and continue to pose diagnostic challenges. Accurate classification of these unique malignancies has treatment implications for patients. Recent discoveries have allowed more detailed molecular characterization of subsets of these tumor types, and may lead to individualized treatments. INI-1 (SMARCB1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a recently identified subtype of sinonasal malignancy, which is characterized by deletion of the INI-1 tumor suppressor gene. Loss of INI-1 expression has emerged as an important diagnostic feature in several human malignancies including a subset of sinonasal carcinomas. In this article, we present a case of INI-1 (SMARCB1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma, provide an overview of recent advances in histological and molecular classification of sinonasal malignancies, and discuss challenges of caring for patients with these rare malignancies, as well as potential treatment implications. KEY POINTS: Clinicians and pathologists should recognize that a variety of sinonasal tumors can present with a poorly differentiated morphology that warrants further workup and molecular classification. Routine workup of poorly or undifferentiated sinonasal tumors should include testing for INI-1/SMARCB1, SMARCA4, and NUT. Patients with these molecularly defined subsets of tumors may benefit from clinical trials that seek to exploit these molecular alterations. The EZH2 inhibitor, tazemetostat, has demonstrated some antitumor activity in INI-1-deficient tumors, and is currently under investigation.

KLF4 activates NFκB signaling and esophageal epithelial inflammation via the Rho-related GTP-binding protein RHOF.

Understanding the regulatory mechanisms within esophageal epithelia is essential to gain insight into the pathogenesis of esophageal diseases, which are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The zinc-finger transcription factor Krüppel-like factor (KLF4) is implicated in a large number of cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, and inflammation in esophageal epithelia. In murine esophageal epithelia, Klf4 overexpression causes chronic inflammation which is mediated by activation of NFκB signaling downstream of KLF4, and this esophageal inflammation produces epithelial hyperplasia and subsequent esophageal squamous cell cancer. Yet, while NFκB activation clearly promotes esophageal inflammation, the mechanisms by which NFκB signaling is activated in esophageal diseases are not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that the Rho-related GTP-binding protein RHOF is activated by KLF4 in esophageal keratinocytes, leading to the induction of NFκB signaling. Moreover, RHOF is required for NFκB activation by KLF4 in esophageal keratinocytes and is also important for esophageal keratinocyte proliferation and migration. Finally, we find that RHOF is upregulated in eosinophilic esophagitis, an important esophageal inflammatory disease in humans. Thus, RHOF activation of NFκB in esophageal keratinocytes provides a potentially important and clinically-relevant mechanism for esophageal inflammation and inflammation-mediated esophageal squamous cell cancer.

KLF4 transcriptionally activates non-canonical WNT5A to control epithelial stratification.

Epithelial differentiation and stratification are essential for normal homeostasis, and disruption of these processes leads to both injury and cancer. The zinc-finger transciption factor KLF4 is a key driver of epithelial differentiation, yet the mechanisms and targets by which KLF4 controls differentiation are not well understood. Here, we define WNT5A, a non-canonical Wnt ligand implicated in epithelial differentiation, repair, and cancer, as a direct transcriptional target that is activated by KLF4 in squamous epithelial cells. Further, we demonstrate functionally that WNT5A mediates KLF4 control of epithelial differentiation and stratification, as treatment of keratinocytes with WNT5A rescues defective epithelial stratification resulting from KLF4 loss. Finally, we show that the small GTPase CDC42 is regulated by KLF4 in a WNT5A dependent manner. As such, we delineate a novel pathway for epithelial differentiation and stratification and define potential therapeutic targets for epithelial diseases.

MT1-MMP dependent repression of the tumor suppressor SPRY4 contributes to MT1-MMP driven melanoma cell motility.

Metastatic melanoma is the deadliest of all skin cancers. Despite progress in diagnostics and treatment of melanoma, the prognosis for metastatic patients remains poor. We previously showed that Membrane-type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) is one of the drivers of melanoma metastasis. Classically, MT1-MMP regulates a verity of cellular functions including cell-to-cell interaction and cell-to-matrix communication. Recently, MT1-MMP has been found to also modulate gene expression. To specifically assess MT1-MMP dependent gene regulation in melanoma, microarray gene expression analysis was performed in a melanoma cell line whose metastatic properties depend on the activity of MT1-MMP. We identified the tumor suppressor gene SPRY4 as a new transcriptional target of MT1-MMP that is negatively regulated by the protease. Knockdown of MT1-MMP enhances SPRY4 expression at the mRNA and protein level. SPRY4 expression inversely correlates with that of MT1-MMP in melanoma samples and importantly, correlates with melanoma patient survival. SPRY4 modulates MT1-MMP dependent cell migration such that inhibition of SPRY4 rescues cell migration that has been impaired by MT1-MMP knock down. MT1-MMP decreases SPRY4 in part through an MMP2/RAC1 axis we previously show promotes cell motility downstream of MT1-MMP. These results identify the tumor suppressor SPRY4 as a novel molecular effector of MT1-MMP affecting melanoma cell motility.

Notch1 Autoactivation via Transcriptional Regulation of Furin, Which Sustains Notch1 Signaling by Processing Notch1-Activating Proteases ADAM10 and Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase.

Notch1 is an evolutionarily conserved transmembrane receptor involved in melanoma growth. Notch1 is first cleaved by furin in the Golgi apparatus to produce the biologically active heterodimer. Following ligand binding, Notch1 is cleaved at the cell membrane by proteases such as ADAM10 and -17 and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), the latter of which we recently identified as a novel protease involved in Notch1 processing. The final cleavage is γ-secretase dependent and releases the active Notch intracellular domain (NIC). We now demonstrate that Notch1 directly regulates furin expression. Aside from activating Notch1, furin cleaves and activates several proteases, including MT1-MMP, ADAM10, and ADAM17. By chromatin immunoprecipitation and a reporter assay, we demonstrate that Notch1 binds at position -1236 of the furin promoter and drives furin expression. The Notch1-dependent enhancement of furin expression increases the activities of MT1-MMP and ADAM10 but not that of ADAM17, as demonstrated by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown of furin, and promotes the cleavage of Notch1 itself. These data highlight a novel positive-feedback loop whereby Notch1-dependent furin expression can induce Notch1 signaling by increasing Notch1 processing and by potentiating the activity of the proteases responsible for Notch1 activation. This leads to Notch1 signal amplification, which can promote melanoma tumor growth and progression, as demonstrated by the inhibition of cell migration and invasion upon furin inhibition downstream of Notch1. Disruption of such feedback signaling might represent an avenue for the treatment of melanoma.

MT1-MMP modulates melanoma cell dissemination and metastasis through activation of MMP2 and RAC1.

Metastatic melanoma remains the deadliest of all skin cancers with a survival rate at five years of less than 15%. MT1-MMP is a membrane-associated matrix metalloproteinase that controls pericellular proteolysis and is an important, invasion-promoting, pro-tumorigenic MMP in cancer. We show that deregulation of MT1-MMP expression happens as early as the transition from nevus to primary melanoma and continues to increase during melanoma progression. Furthermore, MT1-MMP expression is associated with poor melanoma patient outcome, underscoring a pivotal role of MT1-MMP in melanoma pathogenesis. We demonstrate that MT1-MMP is directly required for melanoma cells to metastasize, as cells deprived of MT1-MMP fail to form distant metastasis in an orthotopic mouse melanoma model. We show that MT1-MMP affects cell invasion by activating its target MMP2. Importantly, we demonstrate, for the first time, that activation of MMP2 by MT1-MMP is required to sustain RAC1 activity and promote MT1-MMP-dependent cell motility. These data highlight a novel MT1-MMP/MMP2/RAC1 signaling axis in melanoma that may represent an intriguing molecular target for the treatment of invasive melanoma.

Pluripotent factor lin-28 and its homologue lin-28b in epithelial ovarian cancer and their associations with disease outcomes and expression of let-7a and IGF-II.

Lin-28 and lin-28B are RNA-binding proteins which can block microRNA let-7 maturation and affect the differentiation and proliferation of embryonic stem cells. Lin-28 may also regulate the expression of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II). As one of the pluripotent factors involved in making induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), lin-28 is considered a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. To further understand the role of lin-28 in cancer, we analysed the expression of lin-28 and its homologue lin-28B in tumour samples, and evaluated their associations with let-7a maturation, IGF-II expression, disease features and outcomes in 211 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. The analysis showed that both lin-28 and lin-28B were positively correlated with primary and pre-let-7a-3; lin-28B, not lin-28, was inversely correlated with mature let-7a. A positive correlation was also observed between lin-28B and IGF-II expression, while no association was found between lin-28B and IGF-I or IGFBP-3. The study further demonstrated that lin-28B expression was associated with the risk of disease progression and death; patients with high lin-28B had shorter progression-free and overall survival than those with low lin-28B. These results seem to support the findings of recent in vitro experiments, showing that lin-28 blocks the process of let-7a maturation. Our study also suggests that lin-28B may promote ovarian cancer progression and serve as an unfavourable prognostic marker for the disease. The correlation between lin-28B and IGF-II indicates that the growth factor may mediate the effect of lin-28B on tumour growth.