Assessing the integrity of auditory sensory memory processing in CLN3 disease (Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (Batten disease)): an auditory evoked potential study of the duration-evoked mismatch negativity (MMN).

BACKGROUND: We interrogated auditory sensory memory capabilities in individuals with CLN3 disease (juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis), specifically for the feature of "duration" processing. Given decrements in auditory processing abilities associated with later-stage CLN3 disease, we hypothesized that the duration-evoked mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event related potential (ERP) would be a marker of progressively atypical cortical processing in this population, with potential applicability as a brain-based biomarker in clinical trials. METHODS: We employed three stimulation rates (fast: 450 ms, medium: 900 ms, slow: 1800 ms), allowing for assessment of the sustainability of the auditory sensory memory trace. The robustness of MMN directly relates to the rate at which the regularly occurring stimulus stream is presented. As presentation rate slows, robustness of the sensory memory trace diminishes. By manipulating presentation rate, the strength of the sensory memory trace is parametrically varied, providing greater sensitivity to detect auditory cortical dysfunction. A secondary hypothesis was that duration-evoked MMN abnormalities in CLN3 disease would be more severe at slower presentation rates, resulting from greater demand on the sensory memory system. RESULTS: Data from individuals with CLN3 disease (N = 21; range 6-28 years of age) showed robust MMN responses (i.e., intact auditory sensory memory processes) at the medium stimulation rate. However, at the fastest rate, MMN was significantly reduced, and at the slowest rate, MMN was not detectable in CLN3 disease relative to neurotypical controls (N = 41; ages 6-26 years). CONCLUSIONS: Results reveal emerging insufficiencies in this critical auditory perceptual system in individuals with CLN3 disease.

Assessing the integrity of auditory sensory memory processing in CLN3 disease (Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (Batten disease)): An auditory evoked potential study of the duration-evoked mismatch negativity (MMN).

Background: We interrogated auditory sensory memory capabilities in individuals with CLN3 disease (juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis), specifically for the feature of "duration" processing, a critical cue in speech perception. Given decrements in speech and language skills associated with later-stage CLN3 disease, we hypothesized that the duration-evoked mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event related potential (ERP) would be a marker of progressively atypical cortical processing in this population, with potential applicability as a brain-based biomarker in clinical trials. Methods: We employed three stimulation rates (fast: 450 ms, medium: 900 ms, slow: 1800 ms), allowing for assessment of the sustainability of the auditory sensory memory trace. The robustness of MMN directly relates to the rate at which the regularly occurring stimulus stream is presented. As presentation rate slows, robustness of the sensory memory trace diminishes. By manipulating presentation rate, the strength of the sensory memory trace is parametrically varied, providing greater sensitivity to detect auditory cortical dysfunction. A secondary hypothesis was that duration-evoked MMN abnormalities in CLN3 disease would be more severe at slower presentation rates, resulting from greater demand on the sensory memory system. Results: Data from individuals with CLN3 disease (N=21; range 6-28 years of age) showed robust MMN responses (i.e., intact auditory sensory memory processes) at the medium stimulation rate. However, at the fastest rate, MMN was significantly reduced, and at the slowest rate, MMN was not detectable in CLN3 disease relative to neurotypical controls (N=41; ages 6-26 years). Conclusions: Results reveal emerging insufficiencies in this critical auditory perceptual system in individuals with CLN3 disease.

Fast prediction in marmoset reach-to-grasp movements for dynamic prey.

Primates have evolved sophisticated, visually guided reaching behaviors for interacting with dynamic objects, such as insects, during foraging.1,2,3,4,5 Reaching control in dynamic natural conditions requires active prediction of the target's future position to compensate for visuo-motor processing delays and to enhance online movement adjustments.6,7,8,9,10,11,12 Past reaching research in non-human primates mainly focused on seated subjects engaged in repeated ballistic arm movements to either stationary targets or targets that instantaneously change position during the movement.13,14,15,16,17 However, those approaches impose task constraints that limit the natural dynamics of reaching. A recent field study in marmoset monkeys highlights predictive aspects of visually guided reaching during insect prey capture among wild marmoset monkeys.5 To examine the complementary dynamics of similar natural behavior within a laboratory context, we developed an ecologically motivated, unrestrained reach-to-grasp task involving live crickets. We used multiple high-speed video cameras to capture the movements of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and crickets stereoscopically and applied machine vision algorithms for marker-free object and hand tracking. Contrary to estimates under traditional constrained reaching paradigms, we find that reaching for dynamic targets can operate at incredibly short visuo-motor delays around 80 ms, rivaling the speeds that are typical of the oculomotor systems during closed-loop visual pursuit.18 Multivariate linear regression modeling of the kinematic relationships between the hand and cricket velocity revealed that predictions of the expected future location can compensate for visuo-motor delays during fast reaching. These results suggest a critical role of visual prediction facilitating online movement adjustments for dynamic prey.

Optogenetic activation of corticogeniculate feedback stabilizes response gain and increases information coding in LGN neurons.

In spite of their anatomical robustness, it has been difficult to establish the functional role of corticogeniculate circuits connecting primary visual cortex with the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (LGN) in the feedback direction. Growing evidence suggests that corticogeniculate feedback does not directly shape the spatial receptive field properties of LGN neurons, but rather regulates the timing and precision of LGN responses and the information coding capacity of LGN neurons. We propose that corticogeniculate feedback specifically stabilizes the response gain of LGN neurons, thereby increasing their information coding capacity. Inspired by early work by McClurkin et al. (1994), we manipulated the activity of corticogeniculate neurons to test this hypothesis. We used optogenetic methods to selectively and reversibly enhance the activity of corticogeniculate neurons in anesthetized ferrets while recording responses of LGN neurons to drifting gratings and white noise stimuli. We found that optogenetic activation of corticogeniculate feedback systematically reduced LGN gain variability and increased information coding capacity among LGN neurons. Optogenetic activation of corticogeniculate neurons generated similar increases in information encoded in LGN responses to drifting gratings and white noise stimuli. Together, these findings suggest that the influence of corticogeniculate feedback on LGN response precision and information coding capacity could be mediated through reductions in gain variability.

Operating in a Multisensory Context: Assessing the Interplay Between Multisensory Reaction Time Facilitation and Inter-sensory Task-switching Effects.

Individuals respond faster to presentations of bisensory stimuli (e.g. audio-visual targets) than to presentations of either unisensory constituent in isolation (i.e. to the auditory-alone or visual-alone components of an audio-visual stimulus). This well-established multisensory speeding effect, termed the redundant signals effect (RSE), is not predicted by simple linear summation of the unisensory response time probability distributions. Rather, the speeding is typically faster than this prediction, leading researchers to ascribe the RSE to a so-called co-activation account. According to this account, multisensory neural processing occurs whereby the unisensory inputs are integrated to produce more effective sensory-motor activation. However, the typical paradigm used to test for RSE involves random sequencing of unisensory and bisensory inputs in a mixed design, raising the possibility of an alternate attention-switching account. This intermixed design requires participants to switch between sensory modalities on many task trials (e.g. from responding to a visual stimulus to an auditory stimulus). Here we show that much, if not all, of the RSE under this paradigm can be attributed to slowing of reaction times to unisensory stimuli resulting from modality switching, and is not in fact due to speeding of responses to AV stimuli. As such, the present data do not support a co-activation account, but rather suggest that switching and mixing costs akin to those observed during classic task-switching paradigms account for the observed RSE.

A large-scale assessment of temporal trends in meta-analyses using systematic review reports from the Cochrane Library.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggest that many systematic reviews contain meta-analyses that display temporal trends, such as the first study's result being more extreme than later studies' or a drift in the pooled estimate. We assessed the extent and characteristics of temporal trends using all Cochrane intervention reports published 2008-2012. METHODS: We selected the largest meta-analysis within each report and analysed trends using methods including a Z-test (first versus subsequent estimates); generalised least squares; and cumulative sum charts. Predictors considered include meta-analysis size and review group. RESULTS: Of 1288 meta-analyses containing at least 4 studies, the point estimate from the first study was more extreme and in the same direction as the pooled estimate in 738 (57%), with a statistically significant difference (first versus subsequent) in 165 (13%). Generalised least squares indicated trends in 717 (56%); 18% of fixed effects analyses had at least one violation of cumulative sum limits. For some methods, meta-analysis size was associated with temporal patterns and use of a random effects model, but there was no consistent association with review group. CONCLUSIONS: All results suggest that more meta-analyses demonstrate temporal patterns than would be expected by chance. Hence, assuming the standard meta-analysis model without temporal trend is sometimes inappropriate. Factors associated with trends are likely to be context specific.