Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 93(6): 967-71, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9647030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Diarrhea is a complication of enteral feeding, occurring in up to 68% of critically ill patients. We hypothesized that prolonged fasting results in abnormal bile acid homeostasis. Subsequent enteral feeding then causes a relative luminal excess of bile acids, which leads to choleretic diarrhea. Hence, diarrhea induced by enteral feeding should improve with the use of a bile acid binding agent, such as Colestid Granules. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of Colestid on enteral feeding-induced diarrhea in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Nineteen patients who were nil per os (NPO) for 5 days before initiation of enteral feeding were enrolled in the study and treatment continued for 7 days. The severity and frequency of diarrhea were quantified. Fecal bile acids were measured enzymatically. Stool nutrient loss was measured by fat extraction, microkjeldahl determination of nitrogen, and bomb calorimetry of dried fecal specimens. RESULTS: Enteral feeding resulted in a high frequency of diarrhea (95%) at some time during the observation period. The majority of episodes of diarrhea in both groups were of low volume. Colestid significantly decreased the prevalence and severity of diarrhea. Colestid had no significant effect on fecal calorie or nutrient losses. The average bile acid concentration in the stool increased significantly after enteral feeding. CONCLUSION: Enteral feeding-induced diarrhea is, at least in part, due to malabsorption of bile acids. The bile acid resin binding agent Colestid improves diarrhea induced by enteral feeding.


Assuntos
Resinas de Troca Aniônica/uso terapêutico , Ácidos e Sais Biliares/metabolismo , Colestipol/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Diarreia/etiologia , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Fezes/química , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 75(1): 34-9, 1995 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7801861

RESUMO

A total of 96 patients with moderate elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were randomly assigned to 4 different double-blind treatment regimens: placebo; colestipol 5 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C5 + L20); colestipol 10 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C10 + L20); and lovastatin 40 mg/day (L40). During 12 weeks of therapy, C10 + L20 achieved the greatest reduction in total cholesterol (-32%) and LDL cholesterol (-48%) levels from baseline. This combination also exhibited significantly greater reductions in LDL cholesterol levels than the C5 + L20 and L40 groups (p < 0.01). The differences in total and LDL cholesterol reduction between the C5 + L20 and L40 groups were not significant. Similar changes and differences between treatments were seen in apolipoprotein B levels. Whereas mean total apolipoprotein A-I levels increased with all treatments (p < 0.05), lipoprotein particles A-I were significantly increased in the C10 + L20 group (p < 0.01) only. Results demonstrate that the combination of low-dose lovastatin (20 mg/day) with low-dose colestipol (5 or 10 g/day) produces LDL cholesterol reductions equal to or greater than higher doses of lovastatin (40 mg/day). In addition, low-dose combinations are > 25% more cost-effective than high-dose monotherapy.


Assuntos
LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Colestipol/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Lovastatina/uso terapêutico , Apolipoproteínas/sangue , Colestipol/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/economia , Lipídeos/sangue , Lipoproteínas/sangue , Lovastatina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 27(6): 700-3, 1993 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8329785

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensory and mixability characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules (a new colestipol formulation) with Questran Light (the most recent cholestyramine formulation). METHODOLOGY: Seventy-two nonsmoking adults between the ages of 25 and 64 years were enrolled in the study. Subjects assessed the sensory and mixability characteristics of each product in chilled bottled water and orange juice after at least a one-hour fast. Products were administered in a double-blind, randomized fashion. The sensory characteristics that were rated included overall rating, aftertaste, appearance, aroma, color, consistency, flavor, sweetness, mouthfeel, and thickness. Each characteristic was rated with a nine-point hedonic scale. Mixability of the products was assessed on a five-point scale. Subjects also were asked to choose which product they preferred as to sensory and mixability characteristics in each vehicle. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 72 subjects preferred the sensory characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules in water (p < 0.001). Questran Light was preferred by 61 subjects when mixed in orange juice (p < 0.001). The sensory characteristic rating scores also supported subject preferences for Flavored Colestid Granules in water and Questran Light in orange juice. Mixability of Flavored Colestid Granules was rated significantly better (p < 0.001) than Questran Light in water. There was no significant difference for mixability between the products in orange juice. CONCLUSIONS: Questran Light was significantly preferred on a sensory basis when mixed in orange juice. Flavored Colestid Granules was significantly preferred over Questran Light for both sensory and mixability characteristics with water as the vehicle.


Assuntos
Resina de Colestiramina/administração & dosagem , Colestipol/administração & dosagem , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , Química Farmacêutica , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veículos Farmacêuticos
4.
Toxicol Pathol ; 15(4): 409-16, 1987.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3432940

RESUMO

Groups of 5 male beagle dogs were treated orally with hydralazine tablets in gelatin capsules at a dose of 12 or 24 mg/kg twice a day (6 hours apart) for 2 consecutive days. Five male dogs treated with empty gelatin capsules served as untreated controls. Clinical findings and heart rate changes during treatment and terminal body weight, hematology, and blood chemistry changes were evaluated. The heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, and thymus of each animal were examined microscopically. Dogs in the 12 mg/kg group ate less than control group. Dogs treated with 24 mg/kg did not eat and vomited. Heart rates in both of the treated groups increased by 60% to 80% within 2 hours of treatment and remained high during the entire treatment period. Significant hematologic change was confined to a slight increase in platelet number of dogs treated with 24 mg/kg. Serum glucose was increased in the hydralazine treated dogs. Conjugated serum bilirubin was increased and serum potassium, chloride and phosphorus were decreased in the 24 mg/kg group. Blood urea nitrogen and serum chloride were slightly increased in dogs treated with 12 mg/kg. Treatment-related pathologic alterations were confined to the heart. Two dogs from each of the hydralazine groups experienced acute localized hemorrhage into the epicardium and subepicardium of the right atrium. The media of the muscular branches of the coronary arteries, especially the left coronary artery, was hemorrhagic in 3 dogs from the 24 mg/kg group. Medial necrosis, when seen, tended to be proportional to the severity of medial hemorrhages. There was no necrosis in the papillary muscles of the heart.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Hidralazina/toxicidade , Animais , Análise Química do Sangue , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Cães , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Miocárdio/patologia , Necrose
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...