Inter-Semispinalis Plane Block Versus General Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Postoperative pain management is crucial for improving patient outcomes following posterior cervical spine surgery. Opioids are effective but carry a risk of respiratory depression. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used but may not provide adequate pain relief and have potential complications. The inter-semispinalis plane (ISPB) block is a novel technique for postoperative analgesia in cervical spine surgery. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the ISPB with general anesthesia in terms of analgesia, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, patient-surgeon satisfaction levels, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was blinded to both the patient and the assessor. Fifty adult patients (18 - 60 years old) undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery were enrolled. The participants were divided into 2 groups: The ISPB group (receiving bilateral ultrasound-guided ISPB at the C5 level) and the control group (receiving general anesthesia only), with each group comprising 25 patients. The study assessed intraoperative fentanyl use, postoperative VAS pain levels, the need for rescue analgesia, and complications. Results: The ISPB group showed significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption (median 100 vs. 100 - 150 µg, P = 0.022) and lower postoperative pain scores at 1, 8, 12, and 48 hours (P = 0.016, 0.009, 0.005, 0.016). Additionally, the ISPB group required less postoperative pethidine (20% vs. 64%, P = 0.002) and had a longer delay before requesting pethidine (hazard ratio 0.215, P = 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the ISPB group (P = 0.003). These results suggest that the ISPB can effectively reduce pain and analgesic requirements. Conclusions: The ISPB is an effective analgesic technique for posterior cervical spine surgery, reducing opioid consumption, providing better pain control, and enhancing surgeon satisfaction without increasing complications. This approach has the potential to improve postoperative care and patient outcomes in this surgical population.

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Cartilage Graft in Augmentation Rhinoplasty.

Augmentation rhinoplasty or commonly known as "nose jobs" is one of the most common plastic surgical procedures aimed to improve cosmetic appearance. This procedure is considerably safer, less time consuming with faster recovery and immediate cosmetic effect. This procedure needs of highly experienced and well-trained plastic surgeon. According to facial analysis you can select the type of rhinoplasty. Open discussion with the patient to select appropriate surgical technique and its possible risks with your plastic surgeon to ensure the highest level of safety and satisfaction. Autologous grafting materials are safe, efficient and also the first choice for rhinoplasty due to it can survive without a vascular supply, the resorption rate of cartilage is much lower than that of a bone graft. Autologous grafting materials are stable and resistant to infection and extrusion over time so, they are successfully used for dorsal augmentation. To perform successful augmentation rhinoplasty, surgeons should be highly experienced and well-trained and augmentation materials that are currently available and understand their risks, benefits and uses. Autologous cartilage graft regarded as the graft of choice in augmentation rhinoplasty because of their lower rate of infection, rejection, resorption, extrusion, donor site morbidity, easy reshaping.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing different epidural steroid injection approaches.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and lumbosacral radiculopathy are frequent disorders that cause nerve root injury, resulting in a variety of symptoms ranging from loss of sensation to loss of motor function depending on the degree of nerve compression. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of various epidural injection procedures in adult LBP patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. SETTING: Egypt. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, and Embase were used to conduct an electronic literature search. We included RCTs, cohorts, case controls, patients 30 years old with a clinical presentation of low back pain, and comprehensive data on the effects of the intervention on patients with lumbosacral radicular pain who got epidural steroid injections via various techniques. Only papers written in English were eligible. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that parasagittal intralaminar (PIL) was the most effective approach in decreasing VAS (0-10) in the short term (< 6 months) (MD = -1.16 [95% CI -2.04, -0.28]). The next significant approach was transforaminal (TF) (MD = -0.37 [95% CI -1.14, -0.32]) in the long term; TF was the most effective approach (MD = -0.56 [95% CI -1, -0.13]). According to VAS (0-100) in the short term (< 6 months), our analysis showed an insignificant difference among the injection approaches and in the long term; TF was the most effective approach (MD = -24.20 [95% CI -43.80, -4.60]) and the next significant approach was PIL (MD = -23.89 [95% CI -45.78, -1.99]). LIMITATIONS: The main limitations are the heterogeneity encountered in some of our analyses in addition to studies assessed as high risk of bias in some domains. CONCLUSION: TF was the most effective steroid injection approach. In decreasing VAS for short-term PIL and TF were the most significant approaches, but TF was the most effective approach in decreasing VAS for the long term. Also, TF was the most effective approach in decreasing ODI for the long term.

Incidence of Airway Complications in ICU.

To show the incidence of airway complications in ICU. Endotracheal intubation is an essential skill performed by multiple medical specialists to secure a patient's airway as well as provide oxygenation and ventilation through the oral route or nose. The goal of endotracheal intubation in the emergency setting is to secure the patient's airway and obtain first-pass success. There are many indications for endotracheal intubation, including poor respiratory drive, questionable airway patency, hypoxia, and Hypercapnia. These indications are assessed by evaluating the patient's mental status, conditions that may compromise the airway, level of consciousness, respiratory rate, respiratory acidosis, and level of oxygenation. In the setting of trauma, a Glasgow Coma Scale of 8 or less is generally an indication for intubation. There are many different complications of intubation as hoarseness of voice, dental injuries, arytenoid dislocation, laryngeal stenosis, tracheal stenosis and tracheomalacia. . 150 patients who were sat in the ICU that developed certain complications. 86 patients (57.3%) were sitting in the ICU develoed certain complications. Liver diseases were the main cause of ICU admission 34 (22.7%) patients then shock 32 (21.3%) patients. Blockage of endotracheal tube was the main ICU complications 18 (12%) patients then sinusitis 16 (10.7%) patients. Endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure and its complications are significant problems in ICUs. A successful procedure of intubation avoids complications. Skilled endotracheal intubation in the ICU decreases the complications.