El número reproductivo básico (R0): consideraciones para su aplicación en la salud pública / Unraveling R0: considerations for public health applications

Evaluamos el uso en la salud pública del número reproductivo básico (R0), por el cual se estima la velocidad con que una enfermedad puede propagarse en una población. Estas estimaciones son de gran interés en el campo de la salud pública como quedó de manifiesto en ocasión de la pandemia del 2009 por el virus gripal A (H1N1). Revisamos los métodos usados comúnmente para estimar el R0, examinamos su utilidad práctica y determinamos la forma en que las estimaciones de este parámetro epidemiológico pueden servir de fundamento para tomar decisiones relativas a las estrategias de mitigación. Por sí solo, el R0 es una medida insuficiente de la dinámica de las enfermedades infecciosas en las poblaciones; hay otros parámetros que pueden aportar información más útil. No obstante, la estimación del R0 en una población determinada es útil para entender la transmisión de una enfermedad en ella. Si se considera el R0 en el contexto de otros parámetros epidemiológicos importantes, su utilidad puede consistir en que permite conocer mejor un brote epidémico y preparar la respuesta de salud pública correspondiente.

We assessed public health use of R0, the basic reproduction number, which estimates the speed at which a disease is capable of spreading in a population. These estimates are of great public health interest, as evidenced during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vírus pandemic. We reviewed methods commonly used to estimate R0, examined their practical utility, and assessed how estimates of this epidemiological parameter can inform mitigation strategy decisions. In isolation, R0 is a suboptimal gauge of infectious disease dynamics across populations; other disease parameters may provide more useful information. Nonetheless, estimation of R0 for a particular population is useful for understanding transmission in the study population. Considered in the context of other epidemiologically important parameters, the value of R0 may lie in better understanding an outbreak and in preparing a public health response.

El número reproductivo básico (R0): consideraciones para su aplicación en la salud pública / Unraveling R0: Considerations for Public Health Applications

Evaluamos el uso en la salud pública del número reproductivo básico (R0), por el cual se estima la velocidad con que una enfermedad puede propagarse en una población. Estas estimaciones son de gran interés en el campo de la salud pública como quedó de manifiesto en ocasión de la pandemia del 2009 por el virus gripal A (H1N1). Revisamos los métodos usados comúnmente para estimar el R0, examinamos su utilidad práctica y determinamos la forma en que las estimaciones de este parámetro epidemiológico pueden servir de fundamento para tomar decisiones relativas a las estrategias de mitigación. Por sí solo, el R0 es una medida insuficiente de la dinámica de las enfermedades infecciosas en las poblaciones; hay otros parámetros que pueden aportar información más útil. No obstante, la estimación del R0 en una población determinada es útil para entender la transmisión de una enfermedad en ella. Si se considera el R0 en el contexto de otros parámetros epidemiológicos importantes, su utilidad puede consistir en que permite conocer mejor un brote epidémico y preparar la respuesta de salud pública correspondiente.

We assessed public health use of R0, the basic reproduction number, which estimates the speed at which a disease is capable of spreading in a population. These estimates are of great public health interest, as evidenced during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus pandemic. We reviewed methods commonly used to estimate R0, examined their practical utility, and assessed how estimates of this epidemiological parameter can inform mitigation strategy decisions. In isolation, R0 is a suboptimal gauge of infectious disease dynamics across populations; other disease parameters may provide more useful information. Nonetheless, estimation of R0 for a particular population is useful for understanding transmission in the study population. Considered in the context of other epidemiologically important parameters, the value of R0 may lie in better understanding an outbreak and in preparing a public health response.

Incidence of influenza-associated mortality and hospitalizations in Argentina during 2002-2009.

BACKGROUND: We estimated rates of influenza-associated deaths and hospitalizations in Argentina, a country that recommends annual influenza vaccination for persons at high risk of complications from influenza illness. METHODS: We identified hospitalized persons and deaths in persons diagnosed with pneumonia and influenza (P&I, ICD-10 codes J10-J18) and respiratory and circulatory illness (R&C, codes I00-I99 and J00-J99). We defined the influenza season as the months when the proportion of samples that tested positive for influenza exceeded the annual median. We used hospitalizations and deaths during the influenza off-season to estimate, using linear regression, the number of excess deaths that occurred during the influenza season. To explore whether excess mortality varied by sex and whether people were age <65 or ≥ 65 years, we used Poisson regression of the influenza-associated rates. RESULTS: During 2002-2009, 2411 P&I and 8527 R&C mean excess deaths occurred annually from May to October. If all of these excess deaths were associated with influenza, the influenza-associated mortality rate was 6/100,000 person-years (95% CI 4-8/100,000 person-years for P&I and 21/100,000 person-years (95% CI 12-31/100,000 person-years) for R&C. During 2005-2008, we identified an average of 7868 P&I excess hospitalizations and 22,994 R&C hospitalizations per year, resulting in an influenza-associated hospitalization rate of 2/10,000 person-years (95% CI 1-3/10,000 person-years) for P&I and 6/10,000 person-years (95% CI 3-8/10,000 person-years) for R&C. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that annual rates of influenza-associated hospitalizations and death in Argentina were substantial and similar to neighboring Brazil.

Household economic impact and attitudes toward school closures in two cities in Argentina during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.

BACKGROUND: School closures were widely implemented in Argentina during the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact of school closures on households, their effectiveness in preventing children from engaging in social group activities, and parental attitudes toward them. METHODS: Three schools that closed for 2 weeks in response to the pandemic were identified in two socioeconomically distinct cities in Argentina. All households with children enrolled in these schools were surveyed. Direct and indirect costs attributable to closures were estimated from the household perspective. Other information collected included children activities during the closures and parental attitudes toward the intervention. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 45% of surveyed households. Direct and indirect costs due to closures represented 11% of imputed monthly household income in the city with lower socioeconomic status, and 3% in the other city (P=0·01). Non-childcare expenses and loss of workdays were more common in the city with lower socioeconomic status. Childcare expenses were less common and were experienced by a similar percentage of households in both cities. About three-quarters of respondents in both cities agreed with the closures. The main concern among those who disagreed with closures was their negative impact on education. Children in more than two-thirds of affected households left their home at least once during the closures to spend time in public places. CONCLUSION: School closures may more significantly impact low-income households. Authorities should consider the range of economic impacts of school closures among families when planning their implementation.