The impact of cusp overlap on permanent pacemaker requirement following self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The cusp overlap technique has standardized implantation for self-expanding valves with the goal of achieving more consistent implantation depths and lowering permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation rates. We retrospectively compared short-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve implanted using the cusp overlap technique vs. the traditional coplanar technique in a large tertiary referral center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among PPM-naïve patients who underwent TAVR using the CoreValve Evolut PRO/PRO+. We compared in-hospital PPM rates in patients who underwent TAVR using the cusp overlap technique vs. the coplanar technique. Additional outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complications, annular rupture, and >mild paravalvular leak. Furthermore, we compared outcomes over time to see whether there was evidence of a learning curve. RESULTS: Of the 528 patients included, 270 underwent TAVR using the coplanar technique and 258 underwent TAVR using the cusp overlap technique. The rate of new PPM implantation did not differ between cohorts (17.0 % vs. 16.7 %; p = 0.910). Additionally, rates of in-hospital all-cause mortality (0.0 % vs. 0.4 %; p = 0.328), stroke (3.7 % vs. 1.6 %; p = 0.124), major vascular complications (0.7 % vs. 1.2 %; p = 0.617), annular rupture (0.4 % vs. 0.0 %; p = 0.328) and >mild paravalvular leak (0.0 % vs. 0.4 %; p = 0.444) were similar. Our secondary analysis did not identify any evidence of a learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The cusp overlap technique may not yield a reduction in PPM rates when compared with the coplanar technique. Other confounders should be explored to further minimize in-hospital PPM rates.

Self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves in low risk TAVR patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized studies have broadened the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to also include low-surgical-risk patients. However, the data on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) valves in low-risk patients remain sparse. METHODS: The current study is a post hoc analysis of combined data from both LRT 1.0 and 2.0 trials comparing BE and SE transcatheter heart valves. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients received a BE valve, and 102 patients received an SE valve. The 30-day clinical outcomes were similar across both groups except for stroke (4.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.014) and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.8% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), which were higher in the SE cohort than the BE cohort. No difference was observed in terms of paravalvular leak (≥moderate) between the groups (0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.577). SE patients had higher aortic valve area (1.92 ± 0.43 mm2 vs. 1.69 ± 0.45 mm2, p < 0.001) and lower mean gradient (8.93 ± 3.53 mmHg vs. 13.41 ± 4.73 mmHg, p < 0.001) than BE patients. In addition, the rate of subclinical leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower in SE patients (5.6% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In this non-randomized study assessing SE and BE valves in low-risk TAVR patients, SE valves are associated with better hemodynamics and lesser leaflet thrombosis, with increased rates of stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days; however, this could be due to certain patient-dependent factors not fully evaluated in this study. The long-term implications of these outcomes on structural valve durability remain to be further investigated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: LRT 1.0: NCT02628899 LRT 2.0: NCT03557242.

Evolut PRO/PRO+ versus Evolut R system for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The self-expanding CoreValve Evolut PRO/PRO+ transcatheter aortic valve was designed to overcome the limitations of its forerunner, Evolut R. Evolut PRO/PRO+ offers the lowest delivery profile for 23-29 mm valves, with an external tissue wrap on all valve sizes. We compared safety and efficacy of Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Evolut R. METHODS: We analyzed 300 patients enrolled in the EPROMPT Registry against a historical control cohort of 242 patients who received Evolut R. The two arms were matched (1:1) via propensity-score methodology by accounting for differences in Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, yielding 440 patients. The endpoints included in-hospital safety clinical outcomes, all-cause mortality, and echocardiographic parameters at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, cardiac death (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.995), stroke (1.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.410), life-threatening bleeding (1.1% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.139), major vascular complications (0.5% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.653), and pacemaker implantation (16.9% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.345) were comparable between the Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Evolut R groups. Likewise, the rates of all-cause mortality were similar both at 30 days (0.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.315) and 1 year (1.8% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.159). The rates of moderate paravalvular leak (5.7% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.402), and mean gradient (7.27 ± 3.25 mmHg vs. 8.84 ± 4.36 mmHg, p = 0.105) were also comparable between groups at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Our largest-to-date observational study suggests that the Evolut PRO/PRO+ system is safe and effective in treating severe aortic stenosis, with commensurate 30-day and 1-year mortality and similar 1-year echocardiographic hemodynamic outcomes in comparison to Evolut R.

Disparities among Black and White patients in plaque burden and composition and long-term impact.

BACKGROUND: Black patients presenting to the catheterization laboratory have more risk factors and worse long-term outcomes. This sub-analysis of the Lipid Rich Plaque (LRP) study quantifies the plaque burden and composition of Black vs White patients and associated outcomes. METHODS: Patients with a singular, self-reported race presenting for cardiac catheterization were enrolled if near-infrared spectroscopy/intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) imaging of non-stented, non-culprit (NC) vessels was performed. Lipidic content was quantified at the 4-mm region with maximum Lipid Core Burden Index (maxLCBI4mm). NC major adverse cardiac events (NC-MACE) were defined as: cardiac death, cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and hospital readmission for angina with >20 % disease progression through 2 years. RESULTS: Among 1346 patients with a singular, self-reported race, 182 were Black. Black vs White patients were more likely to be female, had higher rates of traditional risk factors, and were more likely to present acutely. Both patients and segments were more likely to have maxLCBI4mm > 400 (46.7 % vs 30.6 %, p < 0.001, respectively; 15.5 % vs 8.9 %, p < 0.001, respectively). Vessel size and plaque burden were larger for Black vs White patients. At 2 years, maxLCBI4mm > 400 and Black race were independently predictive of NC-MACE (hazard ratio [HR] maxLCBI4mm > 400: 2.37 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.50-3.76, p < 0.001], Black race: 2.8 [95 % CI 1.27-3.42, p = 0.004], pinteraction = 0.137). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to White patients, Black patients had more lipid-rich plaques with greater plaque burden. Both high lipidic burden and Black race were independently predictive of NC-MACE within 2 years. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02033694, NCT02033694.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Impact of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients: LRT Trial 4-Year Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The LRT trial (Low-Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [TAVR]) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of TAVR in low-risk patients, with excellent 1- and 2-year outcomes. The objective of the current study is to provide the overall clinical outcomes and the impact of 30-day hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) on structural valve deterioration at 4 years. METHODS: The prospective, multicenter LRT trial was the first Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption study to evaluate feasibility and safety of TAVR in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid aortic stenosis. Clinical outcomes and valve hemodynamics were documented annually through 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled, and follow-up was available on 177 patients at 4 years. The rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death were 11.9% and 3.3%, respectively. The stroke rate rose from 0.5% at 30 days to 7.5% at 4 years, and permanent pacemaker implantation rose from 6.5% at 30 days to 11.7% at 4 years. Endocarditis was detected in 2.5% of the cohort, with no new cases reported between 2 and 4 years. Transcatheter heart valve hemodynamics remained excellent post-procedure and were maintained (mean gradient 12.56±5.54 mm Hg and aortic valve area 1.69±0.52 cm2) at 4 years. At 30 days, HALT was observed in 14% of subjects who received a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. There was no difference in valve hemodynamics between patients with and without HALT (mean gradient 14.94±5.01 mm Hg versus 12.3±5.57 mm Hg; P=0.23) at 4 years. The overall rate of structural valve deterioration was 5.8%, and there was no impact of HALT on valve hemodynamics, endocarditis, or stroke at 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid aortic stenosis was found to be safe and durable at 4 years. Structural valve deterioration rates were low irrespective of the type of valve, and the presence of HALT at 30 days did not affect structural valve deterioration, transcatheter valve hemodynamics, and stroke rate at 4 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02628899.

Additive Effect of Multiple High-Risk Coronary Artery Segments on Patient Outcomes: LRP Study Sub-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Lipid Rich Plaque (LRP) Study established the association between high volume of lipidic content (maximum Lipid Core Burden Index [maxLCBI4mm] >400) in the coronary arteries and subsequent non-culprit major adverse cardiac events (NC-MACE). This analysis sought to assess the clinical impact of more than one lipid-rich plaque in the coronary tree. METHODS: The LRP patient population was divided into four cohorts: 1) patients with all segments with maxLCBI4mm = 0; 2) patients with all coronary segments maxLCBI4mm < 400, but >0; 3) patients with 1 segment maxLCBI4mm > 400; and 4) patients with 2+ coronary segments with maxLCBI4mm > 400. Baseline characteristics, plaque-level characteristics, and follow-up outcomes were described. RESULTS: Among 1550 patients, only 3.2 % had all segments with maxLCBI4mm = 0; 65.1 % had segments with maxLCBI4mm > 0 but <400; 22.5 % had one segment with maxLCBI4mm > 400; and 9.5 % had 2+ coronary segments with maxLCBI4mm > 400. Distribution within the coronary tree (one versus multiple arteries) did not differ. Overall, 1269 patients were allocated to follow-up (per study design). The composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, any revascularization, and NC-MACE was statistically higher in patients with 1 segment maxLCBI4mm > 400 and numerically even higher in patients with 2+ segments with maxLCBI4mm > 400. Patients with maxLCBI4mm = 0 had no events within two years. CONCLUSION: There is a stepwise increased risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, any revascularization, and NC-MACE according to the number of coronary segments with maxLCBI4mm > 400. In contrast, maxLCBI4mm = 0 results in a low event rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Lipid-Rich Plaque Study (LRP), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02033694, NCT02033694.

The Evolving Impact of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19 Amid the Omicron Wave of the Pandemic.

COVID-19 with myocardial injury, defined as troponin elevation, is associated with worse outcomes. The temporal changes in outcomes during various phases of the pandemic remain unclear. We evaluated outcomes during the Omicron phase compared with previous phases of the pandemic. We analyzed patients who were COVID-19-positive with evidence of myocardial injury who presented to the MedStar Health system (11 hospitals in Washington, District of Columbia, and Maryland) during phase 1 of the pandemic (March to June 2020), phase 2 (October 2020 to January 2021), and phase 3 (Omicron; December 2021 to March 2022), comparing their characteristics and outcomes. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. The cohort included 2,079 patients admitted who were COVID-19 positive and for whom troponin was elevated (phase 1: n = 150, phase 2: n = 854, phase 3: n = 1,075). Baseline characteristics were similar overall. Inflammatory markers were significantly elevated in phase 1 compared with phases 2 and 3. The use of remdesivir and dexamethasone was highest in phase 2. In phase 3, 52.6% of patients were fully vaccinated. In-hospital mortality, though high, was lower in phase 3 than in phases 1 and 2 (59.3% vs 28.1% vs 23.3%; p <0.001). Patients who were vaccinated showed more favorable in-hospital outcomes than did those who were unvaccinated (18.3% vs 24.2%, p = 0.042). In conclusion, patients with COVID-19 with elevated troponin during phase 3 tended to have improved outcomes when compared with patients in earlier waves of the pandemic. This improvement could be attributed to the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccines, advances in COVID-19 treatment options, provider experience, and less virulent variants.

Association of Statins With Nonculprit Coronary Lesions and Adverse Events (from the LRP Study).

Intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy can identify vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques. In this LRP (Lipid-Rich Plaque) substudy, we evaluated the association of statins with nonculprit lesion arterial wall lipidic content and subsequent nonculprit major adverse cardiac events. Patients from the LRP study with known statin use were included. We divided the patients into 2 cohorts-"statin therapy" and "statin-naïve"-upon presentation and then described the intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy analysis based on maximum 4-mm lipid core burden index (maxLCBI4mm). At 2-year follow-up, the patients' clinical events were assessed based on their statin regimen change upon discharge. Finally, patients were stratified by statin intensity based on discharge regimen. Among the 1,526 patients, 1,120 were on a statin versus 396 who were statin-naive upon presentation. Patients on a statin at baseline had a statistically higher rate of cardiovascular risk factors, patients who were statin-naive were more likely to present with an acute coronary syndrome, and the maxLCBI4mm did not differ between the 2 groups (315.67 ± 181.36 vs 325.55 ± 192.16; p = 0.359). These findings were consistent in a secondary analysis evaluating statin intensity. Patients who were switched from no statin to a statin had improved outcomes (nonculprit major adverse cardiac events) compared with patients who were on a statin at baseline without change. In conclusion, despite having a higher burden of nonlipid-related cardiac co-morbidities, patients on a statin at baseline had similar maxLCBI4mm with patients who were statin-naive, regardless of intensity. Initiating a statin at discharge provides the most benefit for events related to nonculprit lesions.

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI: An LRT substudy.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is characterized on computed tomography (CT) imaging as hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT), reduced leaflet motion (RELM), and hypoattenuation affecting motion (HAM). How antithrombotic regimen type impacts SLT remains poorly understood. We evaluated how antithrombotic regimen type impacts SLT in low-risk subjects following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: This substudy is a post hoc analysis of the LRT 1.0 and 2.0 trials to assess SLT in subjects who underwent CT or transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) imaging at 30 days, stratified by antithrombotic regimen received (single antiplatelet therapy [SAPT], dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT], or oral anticoagulation). We also utilized univariable logistic regression modelling to identify echocardiographic predictors of HALT. RESULTS: Rates of HALT, RELM, and HAM were all significantly lower with oral anticoagulation compared to SAPT or DAPT at 30 days (HALT: 2.6% vs 14.3% vs 17.2%, respectively, with p < 0.001; RELM: 1.8% vs 9.6% vs 13.1%, respectively, with p = 0.004; and HAM: 0.9% vs 8.5% vs 9.8%, respectively, with p = 0.011). Additionally, short-term oral anticoagulation was not associated with higher bleeding rates compared to SAPT or DAPT (0.8% vs. 1.8% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.291). The presence of HALT did not significantly impact echocardiographic haemodynamic parameters at 30 days. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date that evaluated the impact of different antithrombotic regimens on SLT in low-risk TAVI patients. Oral anticoagulation was associated with significantly lower rates of SLT at 30 days compared to DAPT or SAPT, and there was no apparent benefit of DAPT over SAPT.

Impact of Close Surveillance on Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Compliance in Myocardial Infarction Patients Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the mainstay regimen for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate DAPT compliance and switching patterns in ACS patients prescribed ticagrelor and aspirin. Secondly, we evaluated the impact of a pilot strategy of close surveillance telephone calls. METHODS: The study enrolled 150 consecutive ACS patients who underwent PCI and were prescribed DAPT (aspirin and ticagrelor). This cohort, the "close surveillance arm," then received telephone calls from a healthcare professional to inquire about DAPT for up to one year. These findings, and clinical outcomes, were then compared to a "historical arm" of ACS patients (n = 505) who received PCI and were prescribed DAPT before initiation of the program. Finally, healthcare providers were surveyed about their experience with prescribing DAPT. RESULTS: The rate of ticagrelor cessation trended lower in the close surveillance arm (22.00 % versus 31.70 %, p = 0.0783). The most common reasons for ticagrelor cessation were adverse medication reaction (dyspnea), bleeding, and financial burden. Nevertheless, the adverse events were few and similar between the two groups during follow-up. Over 96 % of healthcare providers surveyed stated that they worry about their patients' DAPT compliance post-PCI. CONCLUSION: Noncompliance and switching medications are still common for patients who undergo PCI for ACS. A close surveillance program identified patients at risk for medication cessation or switching and could potentially mitigate this phenomenon and improve quality of care.

Correlation between lipidic content and arterial-wall plaque burden: A Lipid Rich Plaque study sub-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Large plaque burden (PB) has been linked to adverse coronary events. We sought to assess the correlation between lipidic content and arterial PB within the Lipid Rich Plaque (LRP) study. METHODS: This analysis included 1269 patients and 5743 coronary segments with both evaluable Lipid Core Burden Index (maxLCBI4mm) and PB. Non-culprit major adverse cardiac events (NC-MACE; defined as a composite of cardiac death, cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and hospital readmission for angina with progressive stenosis) were assessed by hazard ratios (HR) at 2 years. RESULTS: NC-MACE for segment cohorts in the most vulnerable quadrant of maxLCBI4mm > 400 and PB >40% was the highest (HR, 3.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.39-5.66]) with similar rates for just PB >40% (HR 1.31 [95% CI 0.81-2.02]) and just maxLCBI4mm > 400 (HR 1.11 [95% CI 0.10-5.38]). Fewer events occurred in the maxLCBI4mm ≤ 400 and PB ≤40% quadrant (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.11-0.50]). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary segments with high lipid content but no measurable PB were still associated with events at 2 years. NC-MACE vulnerability increased as the lipidic content and PB increased, with the highest incidence within segments having maxLCBI4mm > 400 and plaque >40%. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Lipid-Rich Plaque Study (LRP), NCT02033694, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02033694.

Sex Disparities in Hemodynamics and Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Contemporary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Studies have reported worse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in women receiving early generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs). They have smaller aortic annuli, which could result in higher gradients and more patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after TAVI. We investigated the interactions between contemporary THV hemodynamics and outcomes in women who underwent TAVI. We conducted a retrospective, observational study of patients who underwent contemporary TAVI from 2015 to 2020. We compared baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and hemodynamics according to sex. We then dichotomized women according to aortic annular area (<430 or ≥430 mm2). Included were 869 patients who underwent TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 or CoreValve Evolut PRO/PRO+. Most patients with small annuli were female (82.5%). They had nonsignificantly higher mortality (30-day: 1.5% vs 0.6%, p = 0.313; 1-year: 4.1% vs 2.7%, p = 0.265). Those who received self-expanding THVs had lower gradients (8.0 mm Hg vs 13.8 mm Hg, p <0.001), resulting in less moderate PPM (21.2% vs 73.6%, p <0.001), similar severe PPM (19.5% vs 15.3%, p = 0.454), and higher rates of pacemaker implantation (14.4% vs 4.2%, p = 0.009). Women with small annuli who received a balloon-expandable THV had nonsignificantly higher mortality (30-day: 2.1% vs 0.8%, p = 0.631; 1-year: 6.3% vs 1.7%, p = 0.118). In conclusion, women who underwent contemporary TAVI had nonsignificantly higher mortality, which could be due to higher PPM rates. These findings were more pronounced in the subset of women with small annuli, in whom those who received self-expanding THVs demonstrated superior hemodynamics at the cost of increased rates of pacemaker implantation.

Implications of COVID-19 Vaccination on Hospital Encounters and Outcomes.

Adverse events, including cardiac involvement, after vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been reported. We sought to evaluate trends of hospital encounters for vaccine recipients before and after vaccination. We analyzed patients who received the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine in the MedStar Health system (11 hospitals in Washington, District of Columbia and Maryland) from December 2020 through August 2021. We then compared hospital encounters (emergency department visits) of patients 60 days before a vaccine dose and 30 days after a vaccine dose, along with encounters related to the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself. The cohort included 5,217 patients who were vaccinated against COVID-19. Our analysis revealed a total of 6,751 emergency department visits, and we divided this total into 3 cohorts: fully vaccinated (n = 1,779), in vaccination window (n = 1,420), and before vaccination (n = 3,552). We found no significant association between vaccination and rate of presentation for acute coronary syndrome, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure, conduction abnormality, or noncardiac conditions. Further, encounters for complications related to SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased significantly from those before vaccination (5.4%) to those in vaccination window (4.2%) to those who were fully vaccinated (1.6%). These findings were consistent when all vaccinated encounters were combined into 1 cohort (fully vaccinated + in vaccination window). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that there is no significant association of COVID-19 vaccination with the rate of hospital encounters for cardiac disease, including acute coronary syndrome, pericarditis, myocarditis, congestive heart failure, and conduction abnormality. Further, administration of the vaccine resulted in a significant decrease in hospital encounters for SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated complications.

Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Given enough time, transcatheter heart valves (THVs) will degenerate and may require reintervention. Redo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an attractive strategy but carries a risk of coronary obstruction. AIMS: We sought to predict how many TAVIs patients could undergo in their lifetime using computed tomography (CT) simulation. METHODS: We analysed paired CT scans (baseline and 30 days post-TAVI) from patients in the LRT trial and EPROMPT registry. We implanted virtual THVs on baseline CTs, comparing predicted valve-to-coronary (VTC) distances to 30-day CT VTC distances to evaluate the accuracy of CT simulation. We then simulated implantation of a second virtual THV within the first to estimate the risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration and the need for leaflet modification. RESULTS: We included 213 patients with evaluable paired CTs. There was good agreement between virtual (baseline) and actual (30 days) CT measurements. CT simulation of TAVI followed by redo TAVI predicted low coronary obstruction risk in 25.4% of patients and high risk, likely necessitating leaflet modification, in 27.7%, regardless of THV type. The remaining 46.9% could undergo redo TAVI so long as the first THV was balloon-expandable but would likely require leaflet modification if the first THV was self-expanding. CONCLUSIONS: Using cardiac CT simulation, it is possible to predict whether a patient can undergo multiple TAVI procedures in their lifetime. Those who cannot may prefer to undergo surgery first. CT simulation could provide a personalised lifetime management strategy for younger patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and inform decision-making. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT02628899; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03557242; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03423459.

Impact of Baseline Imaging of Non-Culprit Coronary Lesions on Adverse Events: Insight From LRP Study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can identify vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques. We aimed to compare the presence or absence of baseline intravascular imaging of non-culprit lesions and their subsequent adverse events. METHODS/MATERIALS: We identified patients from the Lipid Rich Plaque (LRP) study who had a non-culprit-lesion adverse event and divided them into 2 cohorts: those with lesions detected with NIRS-IVUS imaging at baseline and those with lesions not imaged at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 73 patients had an adverse event (99 coronary segments) during the 24-month follow-up period. Among them, 41 patients (56.2%) had a non-culprit-lesion adverse event related to a coronary segment imaged at baseline, and 32 patients (43.8%) had a non-culprit-lesion adverse event adjudicated to a segment that was not scanned at baseline. Angiographic core laboratory analysis suggested that unscanned lesions were more often in the right coronary artery (~50%); branches of the left coronary artery, i.e., diagonal or left obtuse marginal arteries (~20%); smaller vessels; or more tortuous vessels; and less often in the left anterior descending or distal locations. There was a weak trend for acute severe events (adjudicated myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome) in patients with lesions not scanned at baseline (50.0% versus 36.6%, p = 0.250). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with follow-up non-culprit-lesion adverse events, nearly half were not imaged with NIRS-IVUS at baseline. Because events related to non-imaged lesions were at least as severe as events related to imaged lesions, future clinical trials and clinical protocols should be designed to minimize this issue. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Lipid-Rich Plaque Study (LRP), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02033694, NCT02033694.

Impact of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Calcification on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification impact following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with contemporary transcatheter heart valves. Recent studies reported a higher rate of 2-year mortality with greater than moderate LVOT calcium, but they have not established a reliable and validated method to assess the degree of valve calcification and utilized first-generation valves for their analyses. MATERIALS/METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TAVR at our institution from 2013 through 2017 with available valves. LVOT calcification quantification was assessed as a continuous variable. RESULTS: We included 273 patients: 179 had a non-calcified LVOT (NOLVOTCA) and 96 had a calcified LVOT (LVOTCA). Balloon post-dilatation (BPD) was utilized in 31.3% of LVOTCA vs. 19% of NOLVOTCA (p = 0.029). The Evolut R valve was used in 40.6% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.002), while the Sapien 3 was used in 59.4% vs. 76.6% (p = 0.004), for the LVOTCA and NOLVOTCA, respectively. Paravalvular leak (PVL) at hospital discharge was higher in LVOTCA (47.5%) versus NOLVOTCA (29.1%; p = 0.004). All-cause mortality (11.5% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.5) and need for permanent pacemaker implantation were similar between the groups. There was a positive trend between LVOT calcification volume and the probability of any PVL (OR 1.012; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR performed in patients with calcified LVOT is safe, but LVOT calcification adversely impacts TAVR outcomes, with a higher PVL rate despite greater usage of BPD. Calcium quantification did not predict any PVL degree post-TAVR.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to report details of the incidence, organisms, clinical course, and outcomes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low-risk patients. BACKGROUND: PVE remains a rare but devastating complication of aortic valve replacement. Data regarding PVE after TAVR in low-risk patients are lacking. METHODS: We performed a detailed review of all patients in the low-risk TAVR trials who underwent TAVR from 2016 to 2020 and were adjudicated to have definitive PVE by the independent Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: We analyzed 396 low-risk patients who underwent TAVR (including 72 with bicuspid valves). PVE occurred in 11 patients at a median 379 days (210, 528) from TAVR. The incidence within the first 30 days was 0%; days 31-365, 1.5%; and after day 365, 2.8%. The most common organism identified was Streptococcus (n = 4/11). Early PVE (≤ 365 days) occurred in five patients, of whom three demonstrated evidence of embolic stroke and two underwent surgical aortic valve re-intervention. Late PVE (> 365 days) occurred in six patients, of whom thee demonstrated evidence of embolic stroke and only one underwent surgical aortic valve re-intervention. Of the six patients with evidence of embolic stroke, two died, two were discharged to rehabilitation, and two were discharged home with home care. CONCLUSIONS: PVE was infrequent following TAVR in low-risk patients but was associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Embolic stroke complicated the majority of PVE cases, contributing to worse outcomes in these patients. Efforts must be undertaken to minimize PVE in TAVR.

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and Thrombosis Versus Those Without Thrombosis.

The occurrence of venous thromboembolisms in patients with COVID-19 has been established. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 over the span of the pandemic to date. We analyzed patients with COVID-19 with a diagnosis of thrombosis who presented to the MedStar Health system (11 hospitals in Washington, District of Columbia, and Maryland) during the pandemic (March 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021). We compared the clinical course and outcomes based on the presence or absence of thrombosis and then, specifically, the presence of cardiac thrombosis. The cohort included 11,537 patients who were admitted for COVID-19. Of these patients, 1,248 had noncardiac thrombotic events and 1,009 had cardiac thrombosis (myocardial infarction) during their hospital admission. Of the noncardiac thrombotic events, 562 (45.0%) were pulmonary embolisms, 480 (38.5%) were deep venous thromboembolisms, and 347 (27.8%) were strokes. In the thrombosis arm, the mean age of the cohort was 64.5 ± 15.3 years, 53.3% were men, and the majority were African-American (64.9%). Patients with thrombosis tended to be older with more co-morbidities. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher (16.0%) in patients with COVID-19 with concomitant non-cardiac thrombosis than in those without thrombosis (7.9%, p <0.001) but lower than in patients with COVID-19 with cardiac thrombosis (24.7%, p <0.001). In conclusion, patients with COVID-19 with thrombosis, especially cardiac thrombosis, are at higher risk for in-hospital mortality. However, this prognosis is not as grim as for patients with COVID-19 and cardiac thrombosis. Efforts should be focused on early recognition, evaluation, and intensifying antithrombotic management for these patients.

High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Arteries Without Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Cardiogenic Shock.

Widespread utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, with a lack of randomized supporting evidence and associated risk of device-related complications. We investigated whether high-risk PCI of native coronary arteries without elective MCS in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is safe and feasible. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis for ACS patients meeting American College of Cardiology high-risk criteria: unprotected left main disease, last remaining conduit, ejection fraction <35%, 3-vessel coronary artery disease, severe aortic stenosis, or severe mitral regurgitation. Patients with cardiogenic shock and those undergoing PCI of the bypass grafts were excluded. Major in-hospital and 30-day cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. From 2003 through 2018, 499 patients (847 lesions) with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), 1218 patients (1807 lesions) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 868 patients (1260 lesions) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) underwent high-risk PCI. Procedural success was achieved in 97.2% of UAP, 98.3% of NSTEMI, and 96.6% of STEMI patients. In-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality were as follows: UAP, 2%; NSTEMI, 2.1%; and STEMI 4.7%. Bailout intra-aortic balloon pump was required in 1.6% of UAP, 3.1% of NSTEMI, and 10.3% of STEMI patients. Major complications for UAP, NSTEMI, and STEMI were, respectively: target lesion revascularization (2.3%, 1.4%, and 1.5%), stroke or transient ischemic attack (0.8%, 0.6%, and 1.3%), acute renal failure (8.2%, 7.2%, and 10.2%), major bleeding (1.6%, 3.1%, and 8.5%). In conclusion, our results show that high-risk PCI without elective MCS is safe and feasible in most ACS patients, challenging professional societies' current recommendations. A randomized trial comparing unprotected versus protected high-risk PCI for non-shock ACS patients is warranted.