Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 225(11): 1923-1932, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35079784

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Additional severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines that are safe and effective as primary vaccines and boosters remain urgently needed to combat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We describe safety and durability of immune responses following 2 primary doses and a homologous booster dose of an investigational DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting full-length spike antigen. METHODS: Three dosage strengths of INO-4800 (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, and 2.0 mg) were evaluated in 120 age-stratified healthy adults. Intradermal injection of INO-4800 followed by electroporation at 0 and 4 weeks preceded an optional booster 6-10.5 months after the second dose. RESULTS: INO-4800 appeared well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events. Most adverse events were mild and did not increase in frequency with age and subsequent dosing. A durable antibody response was observed 6 months following the second dose; a homologous booster dose significantly increased immune responses. Cytokine-producing T cells and activated CD8+ T cells with lytic potential were significantly increased in the 2.0-mg dose group. CONCLUSIONS: INO-4800 was well tolerated in a 2-dose primary series and homologous booster in all adults, including elderly participants. These results support further development of INO-4800 for use as primary vaccine and booster. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04336410.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas de DNA , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais , Formação de Anticorpos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de DNA/efeitos adversos
2.
EClinicalMedicine ; 31: 100689, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392485

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is of high urgency. Here the safety and immunogenicity induced by a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full length spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 are described. METHODS: INO-4800 was evaluated in two groups of 20 participants, receiving either 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg of vaccine intradermally followed by CELLECTRA® EP at 0 and 4 weeks. Thirty-nine subjects completed both doses; one subject in the 2.0 mg group discontinued trial participation prior to receiving the second dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04336410. FINDINGS: The median age was 34.5, 55% (22/40) were men and 82.5% (33/40) white. Through week 8, only 6 related Grade 1 adverse events in 5 subjects were observed. None of these increased in frequency with the second administration. No serious adverse events were reported. All 38 subjects evaluable for immunogenicity had cellular and/or humoral immune responses following the second dose of INO-4800. By week 6, 95% (36/38) of the participants seroconverted based on their responses by generating binding (ELISA) and/or neutralizing antibodies (PRNT IC50), with responder geometric mean binding antibody titers of 655.5 [95% CI (255.6, 1681.0)] and 994.2 [95% CI (395.3, 2500.3)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. For neutralizing antibody, 78% (14/18) and 84% (16/19) generated a response with corresponding geometric mean titers of 102.3 [95% CI (37.4, 280.3)] and 63.5 [95% CI (39.6, 101.8)], in the respective groups. By week 8, 74% (14/19) and 100% (19/19) of subjects generated T cell responses by IFN-É£ ELISpot assay with the median SFU per 106 PBMC of 46 [95% CI (21.1, 142.2)] and 71 [95% CI (32.2, 194.4)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. Flow cytometry demonstrated a T cell response, dominated by CD8+ T cells co-producing IFN-É£ and TNF-α, without increase in IL-4. INTERPRETATION: INO-4800 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability and was immunogenic in 100% (38/38) of the vaccinated subjects by eliciting either or both humoral or cellular immune responses. FUNDING: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

3.
Lancet ; 381(9871): 1021-8, 2013 Mar 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23391465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: BCG vaccination provides incomplete protection against tuberculosis in infants. A new vaccine, modified Vaccinia Ankara virus expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), was designed to enhance the protective efficacy of BCG. We aimed to assess safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of MVA85A against tuberculosis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in infants. METHODS: In our double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, we enrolled healthy infants (aged 4­6 months) without HIV infection who had previously received BCG vaccination. We randomly allocated infants (1:1), according to an independently generated sequence with block sizes of four, to receive one intradermal dose of MVA85A or an equal volume of Candida skin test antigen as placebo at a clinical facility in a rural region near Cape Town, South Africa. We actively followed up infants every 3 months for up to 37 months. The primary study outcome was safety (incidence of adverse and serious adverse events) in all vaccinated participants, but we also assessed efficacy in a protocol-defined group of participants who received at least one dose of allocated vaccine. The primary efficacy endpoint was incident tuberculosis incorporating microbiological, radiological, and clinical criteria, and the secondary efficacy endpoint was M tuberculosis infection according to QuantiFERON TB Gold In-tube conversion (Cellestis, Australia). This trial was registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Register (DOH-27-0109-2654) and with ClinicalTrials.gov on July 31, 2009, number NCT00953927. FINDINGS: Between July 15, 2009, and May 4, 2011, we enrolled 2797 infants (1399 allocated MVA85A and 1398 allocated placebo). Median follow-up in the per-protocol population was 24·6 months (IQR 19·2­28·1), and did not differ between groups. More infants who received MVA85A than controls had at least one local adverse event (1251 [89%] of 1399 MVA85A recipients and 628 [45%] of 1396 controls who received the allocated intervention) but the numbers of infants with systemic adverse events (1120 [80%] and 1059 [76%]) or serious adverse events (257 [18%] and 258 (18%) did not differ between groups. None of the 648 serious adverse events in these 515 infants was related to MVA85A. 32 (2%) of 1399 MVA85A recipients met the primary efficacy endpoint (tuberculosis incidence of 1·15 per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·79 to 1·62]; with conversion in 178 [13%] of 1398 infants [95% CI 11·0 to 14·6]) as did 39 (3%) of 1395 controls (1·39 per 100 person-years [1·00 to 1·91]; with conversion in 171 [12%] of 1394 infants [10·6 to 14·1]). Efficacy against tuberculosis was 17·3% (95% CI −31·9 to 48·2) and against M tuberculosis infection was −3·8% (­28·1 to 15·9). INTERPRETATION: MVA85A was well tolerated and induced modest cell-mediated immune responses. Reasons for the absence of MVA85A efficacy against tuberculosis or M tuberculosis infection in infants need exploration. FUNDING: Aeras, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford-Emergent Tuberculosis Consortium (OETC).


Assuntos
Vacina BCG , Vacinas contra a Tuberculose/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Bactérias/sangue , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Injeções Intradérmicas , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Resultado do Tratamento , Teste Tuberculínico , Tuberculose/imunologia , Vacinas contra a Tuberculose/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra a Tuberculose/imunologia , Vacinas de DNA , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...