Admission for Isolated Low-Grade Solid Organ Injury May Not Be Necessary in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent publications indicate that blunt solid organ injuries can be safely managed with reduced length of stay using pathways focused on hemodynamics. We hypothesized that pediatric patients with isolated blunt Grade I or II solid organ injuries may be safely discharged after brief observation with appropriate outpatient follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for admission of pediatric trauma patients with isolated low-grade solid organ injury resulting from blunt trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of trauma registry data from 2011 to 2018 to identify isolated blunt Grade I or II solid organ injuries among children younger than 19 years. "Complication or intervention" was defined as transfusions, transfer to the intensive care unit, repeat imaging, decrease in Hgb greater than 2 g/dl, fluid bolus after initial resuscitation, operation or interventional radiology procedure, or readmission within 1 week. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were admitted to the trauma service with isolated Grade I or II blunt solid organ injuries during the 8-year study period. The average age was 11 years. Among isolated Grade I or II injuries, seven (14%) had "complication or intervention" including greater than 2 g/dl drop in Hgb in four patients (8%), follow-up ultrasonography for pain in one patient (2%), readmission for pain in one patient (2%), or a fluid bolus in two patients (4%). None required transfusion or surgery. The most common mechanism of injury was sports related (45%), and the average length of stay was 1 day. CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of 51 patients with isolated blunt Grade I or II solid organ injuries, none required a significant intervention justifying need for admission. All "complication or intervention" patients observed were of limited clinical significance. We recommend that hemodynamically stable patients with isolated low-grade solid organ injuries may be discharged from the emergency department after a brief observation along with appropriate instructions and pain management.

Catching the red eye: A retrospective review of factors associated with retinal hemorrhage in child physical abuse.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Accurate identification of child physical abuse is crucial during the evaluation of injured children. Retinal hemorrhages (RH) are used for diagnosis, but clear criteria for screening with direct fundoscopic exam are lacking. We sought to identify key factors associated with RH to guide evaluations. METHODS: Electronic medical records for patients <1 year of age presenting to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center with unwitnessed head injury from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with RH. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six patients were included; 63% underwent direct fundoscopic examination, of which 23% were positive and 77% were negative for RH. Unscreened patients tended to be older and have isolated skull fractures. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that abnormal GCS and subdural hemorrhage were positively associated with a diagnosis of retinal hemorrhage, while isolated skull fracture was negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Children under 1 year of age with subdural hemorrhage have a greater risk of associated RH and should undergo routine screening with direct fundoscopic examination. Conversely, those with isolated skull fractures may not require an ophthalmology consultation. Standardized screening protocols may help reduce the risk of missing child physical abuse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Diagnostic Test).

Effect of an educational intervention on nursing staff knowledge, confidence, and practice in the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Nurses are key providers in the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). New treatment recommendations emphasize symptom assessment and brain rest guidelines to optimize recovery. This study compared pediatric trauma core nurses' knowledge, degree of confidence, and perceived change in practice following mTBI education. METHODS: Twenty-eight trauma core nurses were invited to participate in this voluntary quasiexperimental, one-group pretest-posttest study. Multiple choice questions were developed to assess knowledge, and self-report Likert scale statements were used to evaluate confidence and change in practice. Baseline data of 25 trauma core nurses were assessed and then reassessed 1 month postintervention. RESULTS: Paired samples analysis showed significant improvement in knowledge (mean pretest: 33.6% vs. mean posttest score: 79.2%; 95% CI [35.6, 55.6]; t = 9.368; p < .001). All but two test questions yielded a significant increase in the number of participants with correct responses. Preintervention confidence was low (0-32% per question) and significantly increased postintervention (26%-84% per question). Despite increased administration of the symptom assessment and identification of interventions for symptom resolution posteducation (χ(2)6.125, p = .001), these scores remained low. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that educational intervention effectively increased trauma core nurses' knowledge and confidence in applying content into practice. Postintervention scores did not uniformly increase, and not all trauma core nurses consistently transferred content into practice. Further research is recommended to evaluate which teaching method and curriculum content are most effective to educate trauma core nurses and registered nurses caring for patients with mTBI and to identify barriers to incorporating this knowledge in practice.

Eliminating disparity in evaluation for abuse in infants with head injury: use of a screening guideline.

PURPOSE: Minority and disadvantaged children are evaluated for nonaccidental trauma (NAT) at higher rates than other children. At our institution, we implemented a guideline to perform skeletal surveys to screen for occult fractures in all infants with unwitnessed head injury (UHI). The goal was to determine if this guideline decreased disparities in the screening of African American (AA) and uninsured children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 54 months, rates of skeletal surveillance and abuse determination were compared between AA and white infants admitted with UHI before and after implementation of our guideline. Logistic regression was used to control for confounders. RESULTS: Before the guideline, AAs underwent skeletal surveillance more than whites (n = 208; 90.5% vs 69.3%; P = .01), with 20% of screened infants determined to be probable victims of NAT. Whites with private insurance were less likely to be screened compared to those without private insurance (50.0% vs 88.1%; P < .001). After the guideline, AA and whites were surveyed equally (n = 52; 92.3% vs 84.6%; P = 1.0), with 22% found to be probable cases of NAT. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a successful policy-based intervention to decrease disparity in care. The maintenance of a stable rate of NAT determination despite increased screening suggests more victims of abuse may be identified with guideline use, and therefore, this may be an additional benefit of the guideline.

Mild traumatic brain injury in children: just another bump on the head?

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is frequently encountered in pediatrics and challenges healthcare practitioners to provide safe, consistent, cost-effective care. Clinical management of children who sustain MTBI poses dilemmas for healthcare practitioners. This article will provide an overview of pediatric MTBI including definition, issues impacting diagnosis and management, risk factors for intracranial injury, indications for diagnostic imaging, disposition, and return to sports/activity. Knowledge and understanding of MTBI in children aid healthcare practitioners to make informed competent recommendations for care. Clinicians must have a thorough understanding and working knowledge of pediatric MTBI to aid clinical decisions and optimize patient outcomes.

Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners increase bedside nurses' satisfaction with pediatric trauma patient care.

PURPOSE: Our Level I Pediatric Trauma Center employs pediatric nurse practitioners (PNP) to manage inpatients. We hypothesized that the involvement of a PNP would lead to increased nursing staff satisfaction with patient care. METHODS: Children admitted to the trauma service were randomized to PNP or resident care groups. Nurses caring for these children were asked to fill out a satisfaction survey regarding the care that the child received. FINDINGS: Sixty-five nurses participated. Nurses scored the PNP group significantly higher in human qualities, information given about the tests, management of the child's pain, and response time to pages/questions. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of the PNP leads to higher nursing satisfaction scores compared with residents while providing equivalent care for injured children.