RESUMO
Background and objective Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been reported to aid with the formation of new bone, inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption, and improve osteoblast proliferation. This split-mouth randomized clinical research aimed to evaluate the effect of the local application of ZA on bone regeneration after the removal of bilateral mandibular third molars. Methods A randomized, split-mouth study involving 12 patients aged 19-35 years requiring extraction of bilaterally mandibular third molars was conducted. The extraction of mandibular third molars on both sides was conducted in one session for all patients. In each participant, a gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) soaked with ZA was randomly applied to one cavity of the extraction socket. A gelatin sponge soaked with normal saline was applied to the opposite cavity; all patients were blinded as to which socket the drug was applied to. The study was conducted over a period of two months. The changes in bone density (BD) in the socket were assessed through cone-beam CT (CBCT) images; two images were taken for each patient at two different time points: immediately after extraction (T0) and after two months (T1). Results BD values in the socket on both sides of extraction increased from T0 to T1. There were statistically significant differences when comparing the amount of change in radiographic BD from T0 to T1 between the two sides of the extraction (p<0.05); the increase in radial BD between the two different time points was more significant in the ZA group. Conclusions Within the limitation of this study, the local application of ZA radiographically improved bone healing in a statistically significant manner and could be a cost-effective and simple way to activate bone regeneration.
RESUMO
Research background Dry socket is one of the most common complications occurring after the extraction of a permanent tooth, but despite its high incidence, there is no established treatment for this condition. Nigella sativa oil has anti-inflammatory properties and enhances wound healing. Thus, we have decided to conduct a study to evaluate the efficacy of Nigella sativa oil in the context of dry sockets. Aim of the study This study aims to evaluate the effect of a Nigella Sativa oil dressing compared with an Eugenol dressing for the treatment of dry sockets in terms of accelerating soft tissue healing and reducing the intensity of inflammation. Materials and methods A total of 36 patients (19 males, 17 females), ranging between 20 and 50 years, 40 sockets with Alveolar osteitis randomized into 20 sockets for each group. In the first group, Eugenol with a Gelfoam carrier was used, in the second group, Nigella Sativa oil with a Gelfoam carrier was used and after copious irrigation with normal saline in both groups. Soft tissue healing and the degree of inflammation were monitored on the third (T1) and seventh (T2) days. Results The results of our study showed clinical and statistical superiority in favor of the Nigella Sativa oil group compared to the Eugenol group at time T2, where the P-value was less than 0.05. Conclusions Within the limits of our study, we found that Nigella Sativa oil led to better healing of soft tissues and reduced the intensity of inflammation in the context of dry socket, and was superior in effectiveness to Eugenol, and we recommend its use for the treatment of dry socket.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The entry of the concept of nanotechnologies into the field of biomaterials has improved the results of their use in regenerative therapies based on the principles of tissue engineering, due to its improvement of the physical properties of materials manufactured in this way, so it has become possible to produce particles of hydroxyapatite in nano sizes. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study will evaluate the efficacy of applying nanohydroxyapatite paste and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a barrier membrane in comparison with traditional hydroxyapatite (a powder consisting of macro-sized particles) and PRF as a barrier membrane in symmetrically extracted alveoli of the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research sample consisted of 40 lower alveoli (symmetrical) of the extracted teeth. The study samples were divided randomly into two groups. Group 1: A paste of nanohydroxyapatite with PRF as a barrier membrane was applied to one side of the extraction. Group 2: Hydroxyapatite powder with PRF as a barrier membrane was applied to the alveolus from the opposite side of Group 1 (the opposite side of the extraction). Three radiographs were performed by cone beam conventional tomography (CBCT) in three consecutive periods to conduct the radiological study (T0: immediately after extraction and grafting, T1: after three months, T2: after six months). RESULTS: The mean of the radiographic bone density of the hydroxyapatite powder group at time T0 is 824.36 HU with a standard deviation of ±277.29 HU, and at time T1 is 1119.93 HU with a standard deviation of ±306.93 HU, and at time T2 is 1074.14 HU with a standard deviation of ±223.62 HU, with statistically significant differences when comparing the amount of change in radiographic bone density at time T0 and T1 with P < 0.05, and at time T0 and T2 with P < 0.05, but there were no significant differences when comparing the amount of change in radiographic bone density in T1 and T2 times with P > 0.05. The mean radiographic bone density of the nanohydroxyapatite paste group at time T0 is 629.88 HU with a standard deviation of ±193.64 HU, and at time T1 is 960.67 HU with a standard deviation of ±256.88 HU, and at time T2 is 743.87 HU with a standard deviation of ±180.96 HU, and in the time T0 and T1 with P < 0.05, and in the time T0 and T2 with P < 0.05, and in the time T1 and T2 with P < 0.05. Statistically, significant differences have been found between bone density change T1, T2 in the nanohydroxyapatite paste group and bone density change T1, T2 in the hydroxyapatite powder group P<0.05, which expresses a greater loss of density in the nanohydroxyapatite group, and thus the resorption of the bone graft and the placement of new bone tissue. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of our study, the results demonstrated that the use of traditional hydroxyapatite powder and nanohydroxyapatite paste increases the radiographic bone density, nanohydroxyapatite paste has a greater absorbency after 3 months compared with traditional hydroxyapatite powder which helps replace it by natural bone tissue.
