Lateral Versus Anterior Approach Laparoscopic Splenectomy: A Randomized-controlled Study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study compares prospectively the hospital stay and postoperative complications of anterior (ALS) versus lateral (LLS) approach for laparoscopic splenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2011 and April 2015, 94 patients with splenomegaly were referred to the surgical unit in the Oncology Center of Mansoura University, Egypt. Only 80 patients with splenomegaly <30 cm underwent an open-label randomized allocation into 2 equal parallel groups. Indications were hematological in 52 patients (65%) and malignant splenic conditions in 28 patients (35%). Two patients younger than 18 years, 4 patients with splenomegaly >30 cm, and 8 patients with associated surgical comorbidities were excluded. Three days' hospital stay reduction with LLS was suggested with a power of 80% and P-value of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (P=0.001) after LLS. Laparoscopic splenectomy was completed in 68 patients (85%). Twelve patients (15%) required open splenectomy with no difference between groups. The operation time was significantly shorter in LLS (P=0.013). Blood loss (P=0.057) and blood transfusion (P=0.376) showed no difference between the two groups. The times until resumption of oral intake (P=0.019) and drain removal (P=0.011) were statistically shorter in LLS. CONCLUSIONS: LLS is more safe and feasible with shorter hospital stay compared with ALS.

The outcome of oncoplastic techniques in defect reconstruction after resection of central breast tumors.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, conservative breast surgery was contraindicated in centrally located breast tumors, with total mastectomy as the treatment of choice. However, restorations of the central defects by the oncoplastic volume displacement or replacement techniques have been shown to be effective. The aim of the current study was to assess the surgical outcome of oncoplastic techniques after central breast tumors resection. METHODS: Thirty patients with central breast cancer, including two patients with Paget disease, treated at the Oncology Center of Mansoura University (Egypt) between June 2011 and December 2014 were included in this study. The oncoplastic techniques performed were Grisotti advancement rotational flap in eight (26.7%) patients, classic skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with latissimus dorsi pedicled flap in 20 (66.7%) patients, and skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) with latissimus dorsi pedicled flap using wise pattern inverted T incision in two (6.7%) patients. The choice of the oncoplastic techniques depends on the achievement of free safety margins, the breast volume, and its ptotic degree. RESULTS: The median age was 40.5 years (range; 23-55). There were no major complications that require repeating the oncoplastic techniques. Recorded complications included wound dehiscence (4/30, 13.3%) donor site seroma (4/30, 13.3%), and surgical site infection (1/30, 3.3%). The 6-month subjective patient satisfaction was excellent in 21 (70%) patients, good in 6 (20%) patients, and fair in 3 (10%) patients. There was no episode of local recurrence or systemic metastasis after an average follow-up duration of 24 months (range; 6-42). CONCLUSIONS: Restoring the central defect after resection of the central breast tumors can be safely achieved using oncoplastic procedures including the Grisotti technique or the design of SSM or SRM with immediate breast reconstruction. In our patients, these procedures yield a satisfactory esthetic outcome with lower morbidity.