RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing global pandemic and wearing face mask is recommended across the globe to break the transmission chain of infection. The masks available in the market are of different types and materials and tend to alter the voice characteristics of the speaker. This can therefore impair optimal communication and the present study is a systematic review exploring the effect of various masks on voice production parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The titles and abstracts screening was carried out for the inclusion of articles using eight electronic databases spanning the period from 1st January 2020 to 30th April 2021. 10 articles (8 published & 2 in pre-print) that met the inclusion criteria were considered for this systematic review and the pooled age range was 18 -69 years. RESULTS: Three primary studies from the USA, 2 each from Australia & Italy, one each from Brazil, China, and Germany were found to have investigated the influence of wearing N95, KN95, surgical and fabric masks on voice related measures. The users significantly reported vocal fatigue, discomfort, and also perceived voice problems. Attenuation of speech sound amplitude was highest for the transparent mask followed by cloth mask, N95, KN95, and surgical mask. CONCLUSION: The World Health Organization (WHO) has been repeatedly endorsing the need to use a face mask in the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, for an unintruded voice production, the surgical mask is recommended for everyone, including healthcare professionals when they are not in close contact with patients, and not involved in aerosol-generating procedures. For teachers, doing direct teaching (offline classes), 'surgical mask' can reduce the vocal load of teachers, smoothen the teacher-student interaction and thereby facilitate better learning by the students. Additionally, it would be useful to protect oneself from the risk of developing voice problems by following standard vocal healthcare tips.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Professional voice users form an increasing part of our population. Physical fitness instructors listed as professional voice users are at risk for voice problem as they perform vigorous exercises, instruct at the same time and compete vocally with loud background music. Hence, there is a dire need to study the voice problems in this population. The current study was aimed at investigating the phonatory and respiratory functions in physical fitness instructors in comparison to a control group. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty physical fitness instructors (48 males and two females) and 50 controls (45 males and five females) with the age range of 18-40 years were initially enrolled in the study. The phonatory function measures (perceptual, physiological, and acoustic) and respiratory function measures (aerodynamics) were obtained. RESULTS: Following the data analysis only for male participants, the majority of the perceptual parameters such as grade, roughness, breathiness, and strain showed significant increase in the clinical group compared to controls (P < 0.05). Similarly, few acoustic parameters such as fundamental frequency (F0) related parameters such as average F0, mean F0, highest fundamental frequency (Fhi) and lowest fundamental frequency (Flo) showed significant decrease in clinical group compared to controls (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Few perceptual and acoustic parameters are sensitive in differentiating the voice problems in physical fitness instructors from the controls. The significant perceptual and acoustic parameters implied that they are at risk for developing voice problems. Hence, early identification and prevention of voice problems in this population is warranted.
