Effect of climate on emergency department admissions for renal colic: a comparative analysis of sedentary and non-sedentary lifestyles.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of climate and seasonal variations on emergency department (ED) admissions for renal colic, while specifically comparing the differences between individuals with sedentary and non-sedentary lifestyles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single center study was conducted. Between the years 2017- 2020, medical records of patients admitted to the ED with renal colic, found to harbor ureteric stones on CT scans, were examined. Data on patients' occupational activities was collected through telephone questionnaires. Patients were categorized into two groups: sedentary and active. Precise weather data was obtained from the Israeli Meteorological Service website. The monthly average daily maximum temperatures were calculated. RESULTS: In the final sample of 560 participants, 285 were in the sedentary group, and 275 were in the active group. The study population consisted of 78.1% males and 21.9% females, with consistent gender ratios in both occupational groups. Prevalence of uric acid stones was higher in the sedentary group (p < 0.05). While there was a slight increase in admissions during the summer, seasonal distribution did not significantly differ among occupational groups. The study found no significant differences in admissions across different temperature ranges. Both groups exhibited a pattern of increased referrals during the summer and reduced referrals in the colder winter months. The baseline data revealed notable differences between the sedentary and active groups, particularly in the prevalence of uric acid stones. CONCLUSIONS: Climate factors, including temperature and seasonal variations, had limited impact on ED admissions for renal colic in patients with kidney stones, irrespective of their sedentary or active lifestyles. Both groups exhibited similar admission patterns, with a higher rate of admissions during the summer and a lower rate of admissions during the winter.

Exploring the economic landscape of ureteric stones: impact of age and gender on direct healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether age or gender affects ureteric stone management costs, in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with CT proven ureteric stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective examination was conducted on patients admitted to the ED who were diagnosed with a ureteric stone through CT scans. Data encompassing clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were gathered, alongside information on admissions, ED readmissions, surgical procedures, and the overall treatment cost. Comparative analyses were performed on various cost rates in relation to different stone parameters, patient clinical presentations, laboratory results, and personal histories of urolithiasis. RESULTS: From January 2018 to January 2020, 805 patients underwent abdominal CT scans at a single institution's ED and were diagnosed with ureteric stones. Among them, 773 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 78% (609) being males and 22% (169) females. The mean ages for males and females were 49.4 (SD 14.4) and 51.6 (SD 15.7), respectively (p = 0.08). Treatment costs exhibited a direct relationship with age, amounting to 4,025, 5,116, 6,058, and 9,225 US dollars (USD) in the 18-30, 31-50, 51-70, and over 70 age groups, respectively. Female gender was associated with higher treatment costs, averaging 6,831 USD, compared to 5,450 USD in males (p = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences between genders in terms of the type of surgical procedure (p = 0.4) or hospital stay duration (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender exerted a significant impact on treatment costs, revealing that advanced age and female gender were both correlated with higher direct treatment costs in the care of ureteric stones.

Effect of gender on presentation and outcome of renal colic.

OBJECTIVES: To examine gender-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients admitted to the emergency department ED with ureteral stones. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to the ED at our institution, found to have a ureteral stone on CT. Clinical, laboratory, imaging parameters, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: 778 patients were admitted with ureteral stones between January 2018 and December 2020. 78% (n = 609) were males and 22% (n = 169) were females. The mean ages were 49.4 (SD 14.4) and 51.6 (SD 15.7) in males and females, respectively (p = 0.08). Female patients presented with a higher body temperature (p = 0.01), pulse rate (p < 0.0001), nausea and vomiting (p < 0.0001), elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.002) compared to males. The prevalence of elevated serum creatinine was higher in males (p < 0.0001). Alpha-blockers were recommended on discharge in 54.8% (334) of males, compared to only 29.6% (50) of females (p < 0.0001). Spontaneous stone expulsion was significantly higher in males compared to females (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that gender does effect presentation and outcome of patients presenting with renal colic. Females were found to have elevated infectious parameters, more nausea and vomiting and a higher incidence of positive urine cultures. Males admitted to the ED were found to have significantly higher serum creatinine levels. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) with alpha-blockers was prescribed significantly less in female patients, which may have resulted in a lower spontaneous stone expulsion rate.

Spontaneous stone expulsion in patients with history of urolithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with ureteral stones, with prior history of urolithiasis compared to patients with a first stone event. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who visited the ED that were found to have a ureteral stone on CT. Patients were stratified into two groups: without history of urolithiasis (Group 1) and with history of urolithiasis (Group 2). RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 778 patients were admitted with ureteral stones. Patients in group 1 presented with a higher mean serum creatinine (p = 0.02), larger mean stone size (p < 0.0001), and a higher proportion of proximal ureteral stones (p < 0.0001) than patients in group 2. The 30 day readmission rate was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.02). Spontaneous stone expulsion was higher in group 2 (p < 0.0001), whereas the need for endourological procedures was higher in group 1 (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis serum creatinine (OR 0.264, 95% CI 0.091-0.769, p = 0.01) and stone size (OR 0.623, 95% CI 0.503-0.771, p < 0.0001) were associated with a lower spontaneous stone expulsion rate. History of prior endourological procedures (OR 0.225, OR 0.066-0.765, p = 0.01) was associated with a higher spontaneous stone expulsion rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that patients who are first time stone formers present with larger and more proximal ureteral stones, with a lower likelihood of spontaneous stone expulsion and a subsequent need for surgical intervention. Previous stone surgery and not previous stone expulsion was found to be a predictor for spontaneous stone passage.

Effect of age on presentation and outcome in renal colic.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the age-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who visited the ED at a single institution that were found to have a ureteral stone on CT. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected, including outcomes. Patients were subdivided into age groups: 18-30, 31-50, 51-70, and >70 years. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 778 patients were admitted to the ED with a ureteral stone. About 78% (609) were males and 22% (169) were females. The mean ages were 49.4 (SD 14.4) and 51.6 (SD 15.7) in males and females, respectively (p = 0.08). Patients in the 36-50 age group, had significantly higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.0001). Patients older than 70 years old presented with significantly higher serum creatinine levels (p < 0.0001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and leukocyte levels (p = 0.002). These patients were also found to have significantly larger stones (mean size of 6.2 mm (SD 4.8) (p < 0.0001)) and underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in significantly higher numbers (56.3% vs 43.8%, (p < 0.0001)). Less than half of the patients older than 50 years were given medical expulsive therapy (MET) with alpha-blockers, compared to more than 50% in the other age groups (p = 0.002). Spontaneous stone expulsion was noted in 70.2% of the 18-35-year group, 62.4% of the 36-50-year-old group, 51.8% of the 51-70-year-old group, and 37% of the >70-year-old group (p < 0.0001). The ED re-admission rates at 7 and 30 days were not significantly different among all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that older patients presented with larger stones, elevated inflammatory markers and creatinine and were more likely to require surgical intervention. The spontaneous stone expulsion rate was inversely associated with age.

[UROLOGICAL CONSULT FOR PATIENT WITH RENAL COLIC BEFORE DISCHARGE FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED): THE OUTCOME EFFECT ON SPONTANEOUS STONE EXPULSION AND RE-VISIT TO ED].

INTRODUCTION: Renal colic due to ureterolithiasis is a frequent reason for visiting the emergency departments (ED). The majority of those patients are managed non-surgically and will experience a spontaneous stone expulsion. The ED at our hospital works as a unified department, which is a well-established practice in Europe and North America. AIMS: Assess the outcome of urological consultation in the ED for patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort examined 402 ureterolithiasis patients proven by abdominal CT-scan at the ED. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group1: patients were discharged after evaluation by ED physician alone. In Group 2: patients were discharged after being evaluated by an ED physician and urologist. In Group 3: patients who were admitted to the Urology Department. Clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters were examined as well as patients' outcomes: spontaneous stone expulsion, re-visit to ED and surgical intervention. RESULTS: There were not significant differences between group 1 and 2 regarding age, stone size, stone location, WBC levels, stone expulsion rate or surgical intervention. Group 1 had a significant higher rate of ED re-visits compared with group 2 (79 (43.3%) vs. 12 (17.9%). p=0.0002). Group 3 had significantly higher stone size, creatinine levels, inflammatory markers, proximal stone location and surgical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: ED working as a unified department provides excellent management to patients with renal colic due to ureterolithiasis, with a high rate of spontaneous stone expulsion and urologist referral to admissions and surgical interventions. Nevertheless, urological consultation significantly decreases re-visits to ED.