Pupil size in Jewish theological seminary students.

PURPOSE: To investigate the authors' clinical impression that pupil size among myopic Jewish theological seminary students is different from pupil size of similar secular subjects. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 28 male Jewish theological seminary students and 28 secular students or workers who were matched for age and refraction. All participants were consecutively enrolled. Scotopic and photopic pupil size was measured by means of a Colvard pupillometer. Comparisons of various parameters between the groups were performed using the two-sample t-test, Fisher exact test, a paired-sample t-test, a two-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients as appropriate. RESULTS: The two groups were statistically matched for age, refraction, and visual acuity. The seminary students were undercorrected by an average of 2.35 diopters (D), while the secular subjects were undercorrected by only 0.65 D (p<0.01). The average pupil size was larger in the religious group under both scotopic and photopic luminance. This difference was maintained when the two groups were compared according to iris color under both conditions, reaching a level of statistical significance (p<0.0001). There was a significant difference in photopic pupil size between dark and light irises (p=0.049), but this difference was not maintained under scotopic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The average pupil size of young ultraorthodox seminary students was significantly larger than that of matched secular subjects. Whether this is the result of intensive close-up work or of apparently characteristic undercorrection of the myopia is undetermined.

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct hyperopic shift after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct hyperopic shift following radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: Ophthalmic Health Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. METHODS: The study comprised 15 eyes of 12 patients who had uneventful RK and subsequently developed a hyperopic shift. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with 5.5 mm central and 7.5 mm peripheral ablation zones. The corneal flap was 160 microm in thickness and 8.5 mm in diameter. The refractive correction corresponded to the patients' refractive errors. RESULTS: The mean time after RK was 10.46 years +/- 2.21 (SD) and the mean follow-up after LASIK, 7.3 months (range 1 to 42 months). The mean spherical equivalent refraction was corrected from +3.08 +/- 1.02 diopters (D) to -0.16 +/- 0.73 D after LASIK. At the last examination, 12 eyes (80%) had a refractive error within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. No wound dehiscence, epithelial ingrowth, or other significant complication developed in any eye. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative results of the correction by LASIK of a hyperopic shift after RK are encouraging, but long-term studies of a larger population group are required to evaluate the method's clinical value.