Exploring the psychometric properties of the premonitory urge for tics scale (PUTS) and its association with psychiatric symptoms in Chinese children with tic disorders.

BACKGROUND: The Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS) is a common self-report measure of premonitory urges for patients with tic disorders. This study aims to evaluate the Chinese version of the PUTS (PUTS-C) and to explore its association with psychiatric symptoms in Chinese children diagnosed with tic disorders. METHODS: The psychometric evaluation involved 204 outpatients with tic disorders, aged 7-16 years, who were divided into two age groups: (7-10 years, n = 103; 11-16 years, n = 95). RESULTS: The PUTS-C demonstrated good internal consistency (McDonald'sω = 0.84) and two-week test-retest reliability (0.76). We observed a statistically significant correlation between the total PUTS-C score and various Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) subscales and total tic severity scores. The PUTS-C score also showed significant correlations with the Children Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), Screening Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), and Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Notably, premonitory urges independently predicted tic severity, beyond the influence of comorbid symptoms. A two-factor structure of the PUTS-C was identified in the total sample through factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The PUTS-C possesses acceptable validity and good reliability. It appears that premonitory urges in Chinese patients with tic disorders are associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety, and depression, but can independently predict tic severity. Specific PUTS-C factors possibly related to motor and vocal tics. Future research should continue to investigate age-related differences and the association with tics and other sensory symptoms.

Frequency, predictors, and prognosis of heart failure with improved left ventricular ejection fraction: a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.

AIMS: An improved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFiEF) was observed across heart failure (HF) patients with a reduced or mid-range ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFmrEF, respectively). We postulated that HFiEF patients are clinically distinct from non-HFiEF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 447 patients hospitalized due to a clinical diagnosis of HF (LVEF <50% at baseline) were enrolled from September 2017 to September 2019. Echocardiogram re-evaluation was conducted repeatedly over 6 months of follow-up after discharge. The primary endpoint included the composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Subjects (n = 184) with HFiEF (defined as an absolute LVEF improvement≥10%) were compared with 263 non-HFiEF (defined by <10% improvement in LVEF) subjects. Multivariable Cox regression was performed and identified younger age, smaller left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), beta-blocker use, AF ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as independent predictors of HFiEF. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, HFiEF subjects had lower cardiac composite outcomes (P = 0.002) and all-cause mortality (P = 0.003) than non-HFiEF subjects. Multivariate Cox survival analysis revealed that non-HFiEF (compared with HFiEF) was an independent predictor of both the primary endpoints (HR = 0.679, 95% CI: 0.451-0.907, P = 0.012), which was driven by all-cause mortality (HR = 0.504, 95% CI: 0.256-0.991, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that compared with non-HFiEF, HFiEF is a distinct HF phenotype with favourable clinical outcomes.