[Impact of specimen collection and storage consumable products on trace element quantitative analysis].

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the impact of specimen collection and storage consumable products on trace element quantitative analysis. METHODS: Devices and consumable products of different brands used in specimen collection or storage were selected and treated separately as below:urine collection and storage tubes (Brand A, B, C and D, 2 samples for each brand) were treated with 1% of HNO(3) volume fraction for 2 - 4 h; blood taking device (Brand O, P and Q, 3 samples for each brand) were used for ultra-pure water samples collecting as simulation of blood sampling;dust sampling filters (Brand X, Y and Z, 2 samples for each brand) were cold digested by nitric acid for 12 h, followed by microwave digestion. Then cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, selenium, stannum, titanium, vanadium and zinc concentrations in the solutions obtained during the course of collect or storage were quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. RESULTS: For the urine collection and storage consumable products, background values of elements were described as mean of parellel samples. The consentration of 14 quantified elements were relatively low for 5 ml cryogenic vials (brand B) with background values range of 0.001 - 0.350 ng/ml. The background values of copper of 50 ml centrifuge tubes (brand A), chromium of 5 ml cryogenic vials (brand C) and zinc of 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes (brand D) were relatively high, which were 1.900, 1.095 and 1.368 ng/ml, respectively. Background values of elements in blood sampling devices were described as x(-) ± s. Background values of chromium for brand O, P and Q were (0.120 ± 0.017), (0.337 ± 0.093) and (0.360 ± 0.035) ng/ml; for copper were (0.050 ± 0.001), (0.017 ± 0.012) and (0.103 ± 0.015) ng/ml; for lead were (0.057 ± 0.072), (0.183 ± 0.118) and (0.347 ± 0.006) ng/ml; for titanium were (7.883 ± 0.145), (8.863 ± 0.190) and (8.613 ± 0.274) ng/ml; zinc were (2.240 ± 0.573), (42.140 ± 22.756) and (8.850 ± 3.670) ng/ml. There were statistically differences of background values for chromium, copper, lead, titanium and zinc among the above three brands of blood sampling devices (all P values < 0.05). For air sampling filters, background values of elements were described as mean of parellel samples. Background values of chromium and nickel of sampling filters (brand X) were lowest, which were 17.000 and 15.400 ng per piece, respectively; while background values for other elements were relatively high, the quantification of cadmium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, lead, selenium, stannum, titanium, vanadium and zinc were 0.250, 0.550, 48.500, 690.000, 25.500, 0.900, 6.500, 10.550, 7.950, 10.500, 0.850, 370.000 ng per piece, respectively. Background values of chromium and nickel of sampling filters (brand Z) were highest, which were 171.000 and 29.850 ng per piece. CONCLUSION: Background values of trace elements varied among products of different brands, and the most noticable differences were found in chromium, manganese, nickel, lead, stannum and zinc.

[Two types of MWNTs with different surface modifications induce differential expression of proteins in RAW264.7 cells].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the different expression of protein in RAW264.7 macrophage cells induced by two types of MWNTs (multi-walled carbon nanotubes) with different surface modifications (acid-treated MWNTs and tau-MWNTs modified by taurine). METHODS: Treating cells with both types of MWNTs in 20 mg/L and 24 h, with a blank-control group set. Cells are lysed by using urea and by ultrasonicating in ice bath, then total proteins of cells are extracted. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to separate total proteins of cells, searching for the differential expressed protein spots on the images of the gels with silver staining. Identifying the differentially expressed proteins via mass spectrometry, and studying the mechanism of effects on cells imposed by two types of MWNTs at protein level. RESULTS: There are 13 spots of protein with notably differential expression among three treated groups (including blank controls). Their functions involve apoptosis-related, calcium-binding, cell-cycle related, DNA synthesis, folding of proteins, and energy metabolism, etc. The results are consistent with our previous studies about the cytotoxicity of Both types of MWNTs including induction of apoptosis and mitochodira damage. CONCLUSION: Both two types of MWNTs could induce alteration of protein expression in RAW264.7 cells. With different surface modifications, they imposed different effects. High throughout proteomics could be applied in toxicity assessment and mechanism investigation about carbon nanotubes.