Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonmaturing Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access via Transradial Approach: A Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of transradial access for endovascular treatment of nonmaturing hemodialysis fistulae compared to brachial arteriography followed by unidirectional or bidirectional fistula access for intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, retrospective, case-control study, 56 consecutive patients with nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae underwent percutaneous intervention between 2015 and 2018. The transradial group (n = 28) underwent radial artery access for diagnostic fistulography and intervention. The control group (n = 28) underwent retrograde brachial artery access for fistulography followed by unidirectional/bidirectional fistula access for intervention. Both groups had similar demographics, fistula characteristics, and stenosis locations. RESULTS: Fewer punctures were required in the transradial group compared to controls (1.2 vs 2.4, P < .0001), and procedure time was shorter (64.9 vs 91.3 minutes, P = .0016). Anatomic, technical, and clinical success rates trended higher in the transradial group compared to controls (93% vs 86%, 96% vs 89%, and 82% vs 64%, respectively). Nonmaturation resulting in fistula abandonment was lower in the transradial group (3.7% vs 25%, P = .025). Primary unassisted patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 77.1% ± 8.2%, 73.1% ± 8.7%, and 53.3% ± 10.6% in the transradial group, respectively, and 63.0% ± 9.3%, 55.6% ± 9.6%, and 48.1% ± 9.6% in the control group, respectively (P = .76). Primary assisted patency at 12 months was 92.3% ± 5.3% in the transradial group compared to 61.8% ± 9.6% at 12 months in the control group (P = .021). No major complications occurred. Minor complications were lower in the transradial group than in the control group (14% vs 39%, P = .068). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of nonmaturing fistulae via a transradial approach was safe, improved midterm patency, and was associated with lower rates of fistula abandonment.

Patient-Centered and Specialty-Specific Case Work-Up: An Effective Method for Teaching Appropriateness of Imaging to Medical Students.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Our institution has developed a mini-course program within the diagnostic radiology elective curriculum that promotes active learning, using patient cases specifically tailored to students' future specialties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this mini-course on medical student knowledge of imaging appropriateness and attitude toward radiologist consultation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During each month-long radiology elective course, students were divided into teams of up to four students based on their specialty interest and assigned recent patient cases with imaging findings relevant to their specialties. The students researched their customized patient cases, integrated pertinent clinical and imaging findings, and presented their findings in a final preceptor-led session. A five-point Likert-type item preprogram and postprogram survey assessing knowledge of imaging appropriateness and attitude toward radiologist consultation was sent to the enrolled medical students. RESULTS: Out of 36 medical students, 33 (92%) completed the preprogram survey and 31 (86%) completed the postprogram survey. Students reported improved confidence in knowledge of imaging appropriateness, such as indications for intravenous contrast (p < 0.0005) and oral contrast (p < 0.0005). Furthermore, students reported an improved understanding of how to utilize radiologists (p < 0.005) and how to provide pertinent clinical historical information when requesting a radiology exam (p < 0.0005). Students reported that researching the patient's historical and clinical information in conjunction with the radiology images made them more invested in the case. CONCLUSION: Assigning customized patient cases to medical students on diagnostic radiology elective, tailored to their future specialties, is an effective and active way to teach imaging appropriateness and to improve attitudes toward radiologist consultation.

Quality of CT Imaging of Periocular Metallic Foreign Bodies Using Artifact Reduction Software.

PURPOSE: CT is the standard of care for assessment of ocular and orbital trauma; however, artifacts from metallic foreign bodies can limit the utility of CT. The authors hypothesize that implementation of metal artifact reduction techniques can improve image quality and diagnostic confidence for a diverse group of interpreters. METHODS: A case series of ten subjects with retained periocular metallic foreign bodies imaged with CT were identified retrospectively from a large urban trauma center. Postacquisition images were processed with an iterative-based metal streak artifact reduction software. The severity of the metal streak artifact was assessed by clinicians including radiologists (4), ophthalmologists (4), and oculoplastic specialists (3) using a numeric scale to grade images on seven clinically relevant criteria. Each image was also analyzed to measure the size of the artifact and degree of streaking. RESULTS: Overall confidence in diagnosis and severity of metallic streak was improved with metallic artifact reduction (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similarly, confidence in assessing specific features-including extra-ocular muscle, optic nerve, globe rupture, orbital fracture and identification of foreign bodies-was improved after metallic artifact reduction (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The standard deviation of pixel intensity for a path surrounding the foreign body as well as the area of the streak artifact decreased in the metallic artifact reduction-processed images (p < 0.001, paired t test). CONCLUSIONS: Metal artifact reduction in CT has potential benefits in improving image quality and reader confidence for periocular trauma cases in real-world settings.

Impact of Early Radiology Research Experiences on Medical Student Perceptions of Radiology and Research.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To promote opportunities for medical students to gain early exposure to radiology and research, our institution has initiated programs which fund summer radiology research projects for rising second-year medical students. This study assesses the impact of these faculty-mentored summer research experiences on medical student perceptions of radiology and research, in terms of both knowledge and interest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to students both before and after the summer research period. Both the pre-program survey and post-program survey included 7-point Likert-scale questions (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree) to evaluate students' perceptions about research and students' perceptions about radiology as a specialty. Faculty mentors were sent an analogous post-program survey that included an evaluation of their student's research skills. RESULTS: The surveys were completed by 9 of 11 students and 10 of 11 mentors. Students' perceived knowledge of radiology as a specialty improved (P = 0.02) between the pre-program survey and post-program survey. Similarly, there was an increase in students' perceived knowledge of research skills (P = 0.02) between the pre-program survey and post-program survey, with student ratings of research skills consistent with those of mentors. High student interest in both radiology and research was maintained over the course of the program. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggests that summer research experiences can improve knowledge of radiology and research among medical students. Continued evaluation of this annual program will allow us to enhance the benefit to medical students and thereby bolster interest in academic radiology.