RESUMO
PURPOSE: One year of neratinib therapy is known to derive a significant invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) benefit in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR +), HER2 + , node-positive breast cancer after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Limitations to neratinib use include significant gastrointestinal side effects, which often result in treatment discontinuation. In this study, we aimed to identify clinicopathologic features associated with adjuvant neratinib use and factors impacting treatment completion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with early-stage HR + HER2 + breast cancer who were prescribed neratinib from 2017 to 2023 at our institution. We used the electronic medical record to extract information on patient characteristics, clinical features, and treatment information. Patients were identified as high risk based on definitions adapted from the standard high-risk definition in HR + HER2- breast cancer combined with studies correlating high Ki67 or high tumor grade with lower recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided T-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: We identified 62 eligible patients of whom 55% completed 1 year of neratinib and 45% did not. Sixty percent (N = 37) of patients offered neratinib were considered high risk at diagnosis. The most common reason for neratinib discontinuation was inability to tolerate side effects (54%) followed by pill burden (18%). The most common side effect experienced by patients was diarrhea despite anti-diarrheal prophylaxis (56%), followed by rash (8%). Patients who received an up-titration of neratinib were more likely to complete the full course of neratinib when compared to those who did not (76% vs. 40.5% p = 0.013). The median starting dose of those who completed neratinib treatment was 140 vs. 240 mg in those who did not (p = 0.016). Neither group experienced a statistically significant greater likelihood of treatment holds or dose reductions. In terms of outcomes, 10 patients had progression of disease of whom 7 did not complete neratinib treatment (p = 0.169). Interestingly, those 7 patients developed metastatic disease and 57% (N = 4) had central nervous system metastases. CONCLUSION: Patients are more likely to complete 1 year of adjuvant neratinib with dose up-titration. Dose reductions and interruptions did not affect neratinib adherence in our patient population. Seven patients (11%) in our study developed metastatic disease, all of whom did not complete adjuvant neratinib treatment.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Approximately 15% of women who receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as adjuvant treatment for high-risk, localized hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer may have inadequate estradiol suppression which can require therapeutic modification when used in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI). We previously reported that abemaciclib may interfere with the estradiol Abbott Alinity chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) commonly used to monitor estradiol levels and suggested liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is preferred in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine discrepancies in estradiol levels using CMIA compared to LC-MS/MS and subsequent treatment changes in a larger patient population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer at our institution who received adjuvant OFS and abemaciclib with at least 1 CMIA estradiol level drawn during abemaciclib therapy from October 2021 to April 2023. RESULTS: Of the 22 women who met criteria for review, 20 (90.9%) had CMIA estradiol levels in the premenopausal range, of whom 9 also had estradiol measured by LC-MS/MS. All 9 women receiving OFS and abemaciclib with estradiol measurements by both methods had premenopausal range CMIA estradiol levels and postmenopausal range LC-MS/MS estradiol levels. Of the 20 patients with premenopausal estradiol levels by CMIA estradiol, treatment changes included increased OFS dosage or preparation (n = 7), change from AI to tamoxifen (n = 3), and surgical oophorectomy (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the likely interference of abemaciclib with the Abbott Alinity immunoassay which may lead to unnecessary treatment changes. It is recommended that the LC-MS/MS assay be used when monitoring estradiol levels in patients receiving abemaciclib concurrently with OFS.