An iodine­labelled Antibody-drug conjugate PET probe for noninvasive monitoring of Nectin-4 expression in urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Some kinds of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with high affinity to Nectin-4 have demonstrated breakthrough progress in the third-line setting for bladder cancer. However, many patients are still difficult to benefit from treatment based on the heterogeneity of tumour. As the most advanced auxiliary treatment technology, treatment visualization can most intuitively predict the effectiveness of drug treatment, and timely detect the occurrence of drug resistance. Among them, nuclear medicine molecular probes play an important role in this field. METHODS: 124/125I-EV was prepared by labelling Enfortumad Vedetin (EV), an ADC drugs widely used in clinic targeted Nectin-4, with Na124/125I using N-bromine succinimide as oxidant. The radiochemical purity was analyzed via radio-TLC and bioactivity was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cell uptake assay and small-animal PET imaging were performed to verified the specificity and targeting. KEY RESULTS: 124/125I-EV was prepared with high labeling yield and radiochemical purity. ELISA assays demonstrated that 124I-EV maintained the same high bioactivity as EV with significantly higher uptake in SW780 cells (Nectin-4 positive, 4.05 ± 0.32 %IA/5 × 105 cells at 8 h) than that in T24 cells (Nectin-4 negative, 1.34 ± 0.18 %IA/5 × 105 cells, p < 0.001). In PET imaging, 124I-EV had a significantly higher accumulation in SW780 tumour than that in T24 tumour and the uptake in SW780 tumour could be specifically blocked when co-injected with cold EV. The signal-to-noise ratio at the tumour site gradually increased with time, and peaked at 72 h. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: 124I-EV was successfully prepared with high specificity and binding affinity of Nectin-4. This radioactive probe completely simulates the internal circulation of ADC drugs and tumour uptake and retention, which will greatly improve the clinical application of ADC therapy.

Sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of sorafenib and sunitinib with regard to overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed to elucidate the relationship between clinical variables and prognosis comparing sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with mRCC. Between September 2006 and December 2014, 845 patients received either sorafenib (400 mg bid; n = 483) or sunitinib (50 mg q.d; n = 362). The primary end point was OS and PFS. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with low and moderate risk according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) score was significantly higher in sunitinib group, and that with high risk was significantly higher in sorafenib group (15.1 vs. 5.2%; p < 0.001). Median OS was similar in sorafenib and sunitinib group (24 vs. 24 months; p = 0.298). Sorafenib group exhibited higher mPFS compared to sunitinib group (11.1 vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.028). Treatment (sorafenib vs sunitinib), pathology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, MSKCC scores, Heng's criteria of risk, and number of metastases were identified as significant predictors for OS and along with liver metastasis for PFS. Clinical outcomes in terms of mOS was significantly better with sorafenib in patients ≥65 years of age (p = .041), ECOG 0 (p = 0.0001), and median MSKCC risk score (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib and sunitinib are both effective in treating mRCC. However, sorafenib might be more effective in elderly patients (≥65 years) and in patients with an ECOG status of 0, classified under MSKCC moderate risk.

[Phase II clinical trial of sorafenib plus local chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with pleural effusion].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sorafenib plus cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with pleural effusion. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with mRCC (clear cell carcinoma) with pleural effusion from April 2009 to January 2011 were recruited. All received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. And 11 patients in chemotherapy group received sorafenib plus local chemotherapeutic perfusion of cisplatin 40 mg weekly for 2 weeks while another 19 patients in control group received sorafenib alone. RESULTS: The response rate of pleural effusion was 10/11 for chemotherapy group versus 3/19 for control group (χ(2) = 13.097, P < 0.01). Followed up to April 30(th), 2011, 5 of 11 patients in chemotherapy group and 10 of 19 patients in control group died. Among those on sorafenib, the median overall survival time was 22 months (95%CI: 2.12 - 41.88) for local chemotherapy versus 9 months (95%CI: 8.20 - 9.80) without local therapy (P = 0.04). The most common events in local chemotherapy group were I-II thoracic pain, nausea and vomiting. And the incidence rates were 8/11 and 9/11 versus 4/19 and 3/19 respectively (P < 0.01). The main laboratory abnormalities were similar in two groups. CONCLUSION: The regimen of sorafenib plus pleural cavity perfusion of cisplatin is both effective and safe in the treatment of mRCC with pleural effusion. It may control local symptoms and achieve a better overall survival.

[Clinical study on recombinant human interleukin-2 (Proleukin) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous injection of recombinant human interleukin-2 (Proleukin) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Forty-one patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic RCC after radical nephrectomy were enrolled into this study. Two or four consecutive cycles of subcutaneous injection of rhLL-2 were given, with each cycle duration of five weeks consisting of 4 weeks of treatment and one week of rest. The rhLL-2 was injected twice daily subcutaneously at a dose of 9 MIU on D1-D5 during week one, then 9 MIU twice daily on D1-D2 and followed by 9 MIU daily on D3-D5 during week 2-4. Patients were evaluated after the second cycle of treatment. If an objective response or stable disease was observed, the patient would receive another two cycles of treeatment. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, the overall objective response rate was 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 5.6% to 28.6%) with a complete response (CR) rate of 0.0% and partial response rate (PR) of 17.1%. However, nineteen patients (46.3%) still had a stable disease (SD), and 15 (36.6%) had progressed disease (PD). The disease control rate was 63.4% and the median time to progression (mTTP) was 6 months. The 1-year survival rate was 71.2% with a median overall survival (mOS) rate of 22.5 months. Among 36 PP population, the overall objective response rate was 19.4% (95% confidence interval, 6.5% to 32.3%) with CR rate of 0.0% and PR rate of 19.4%. Sixteen patients(44.4%) had stable disease, and 13 (36.1%) progressed disease. The disease control rate was 63.9%. The 1-year survival rate was 66.7% with a median time to progression of 6 months. The median overall survival (mOS) had not reached yet. The follow-up data showed that the long term survival of the patient who responsed to the IL-2 therapy can be prolonged. Severe toxicity (> or = grade III) was rarely observed. Grade I or II toxicities such as fatigue (100.0%) and fever (82.9%) were frequently observed but reversible. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous injection of recombinant human interleukin-2 may prolong the survival of patients with a metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This regimen is tolerable with rare severe toxicities.