Development of porous structure for broadening Bragg-peak in scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental validation.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to develop a porous structure with plug-ins (PSP) to broaden the Bragg peak width (BPW, defined as the distance in water between the proximal and distal 80% dose) of the carbon ion beam while maintaining a sharp distal falloff width (DFW, defined as the distance along the beam axis where the dose in water reduces from 80% to 20%). METHODS: The binary voxel models of porous structure (PS) and PSP were established in the Monte Carlo code FLUKA and the corresponding physical models were manufactured by 3D printing. Both experiment and simulation were performed for evaluating the modulation capacity of PS and PSP. BPWs and DFWs derived from each integral depth dose curves were compared. Fluence homogeneity of 430 MeV/u carbon-ion beam passing through the PSP was recorded by analyzing radiochromic films at six different locations downstream the PSP in the experiment. Additionally, by changing the beam spot size and incident position on the PSP, totally 48 different carbon-ion beams were simulated and corresponding deviations of beam metrics were evaluated to test the modulating stability of PSP. RESULTS: According to the measurement data, the use of PSP resulted in an average increase of 0.63 mm in BPW and a decrease of 0.74 mm in DFW compared to PS. The 2D radiation field inhomogeneities were lower than 3 % when the beam passing through a ≥ 10 cm PMMA medium. Furthermore, employing a spot size of ≥ 6 mm ensures that beam metric deviations, including BPW, DFW, and range, remain within a deviation of 0.1 mm across various incident positions. CONCLUSION: The developed PSP demonstrated its capability to effectively broaden the BPW of carbon ion beams while maintaining a sharp DFW comparing to PS. The superior performance of PSP, indicates its potential for clinical use in the future.

Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation.

Objective. To assess the dosimetric consequences and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the organs at risk (OARs) in intensity-modulated particle radiotherapy of proton (IMPT) and carbon-ion (IMCT) using a fixed-beam delivery system when compared with intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced small-cell lung cancer.Approach. The plans were all designed under the same total relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted prescription dose, in which the planning target volume (PTV) of the internal gross target volume(IGTV) and the PTV of the clinical target volume was irradiated with 69.3 Gy (RBE) and 63 Gy (RBE), respectively, using a simultaneously integrated boosting (SIB) technique. NTCPs were estimated for heart, lung, esophagus and spinal cord by Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and logistic models. Dose escalation was simulated under the desired NTCP values (0.05, 0.10 and 0.50) of the three radiation techniques.Main results. Under the similar target coverage, almost all OARs were significantly better spared (p< 0.05) when using the particle radiotherapy except for D1cc (the dose to 1 cm3of the volume) of the proximal bronchial tree (p> 0.05). At least 57.6% of mean heart dose, 28.8% of mean lung dose and 19.1% of mean esophageal dose were reduced compared with IMRT. The mean NTCP of radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) in the ipsilateral lung was 0.39 ± 0.33 (0.39 ± 0.31) in IMPT plans and 0.36 ± 0.32 (0.35 ± 0.30) in IMCT plans compared with 0.66 ± 0.30 (0.64 ± 0.28) in IMRT plans by LKB (logistic) models. The target dose could be escalated to 78.3/76.9 Gy (RBE) in IMPT/IMCT plans compared with 61.7 Gy (RBE) in IMRT plans when 0.50 of NTCP in terms of RP in the ipsilateral lung was applied.Significance. This study presents the potential of better control of the side effects and improvement of local control originating from the dosimetric advantage with the application of IMPT and IMCT with the SIB technique for locally advanced lung cancer, even with limited beam directions.

A simple method to import CAD mesh format models in FLUKA.

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo (MC) code FLUKA possesses widespread usage and accuracy in the simulation of particle beam radiotherapy. However, the conversion from computer-aided design (CAD) mesh format models to FLUKA readable geometries could not be implemented directly and conveniently. A simple method was required to be developed. PURPOSE: The present study proposed a simple method to voxelize CAD mesh format files by using a Python-based script and establishing geometric models in FLUKA. METHODS: Five geometric models including cube, sphere, cone, ridge filter (RGF), and 1D-Ripple Filter (1D-RiFi) were created and exported as CAD mesh format files (.stl). An open-source Python-based script was used to convert them into voxels by endowing X, Y, and Z (following the Cartesian coordinates system) of solid materials in the three-dimensional (3D) grid. A FLUKA (4-2.2, CERN) predefined routine was used to establish the voxelized geometry model (VGM), while Flair (3.2-1, CERN) was used to build the direct geometry model (DGM) in FLUKA for comparison purposes. Uniform carbon ion radiation fields 8×8 cm3 and 4×4 cm3 were generated to transport through the five pairs of models, 2D and 3D dose distributions were compared. The integral depth dose (IDD) in water of three different energy levels of carbon ion beams transported through 1D-RiFis were also simulated and compared. Moreover, the volume between CAD mesh and VGMs, as well as the computing speed between FLUKA DGMs and VGMs were simultaneously recorded. RESULTS: The volume differences between VGMs and CAD mesh models were not more than 0.6%. The maximum mean point-to-point deviation of IDD distribution was 0.7% ± 0.51% (mean ± standard deviation). The 3D dose Gamma-index passing rates were never lower than 97% with criteria of 1%-1 mm. The difference in computing CPU time was 2.89% ± 0.22 on average. CONCLUSIONS: The present study proposed and verified a Python-based method for converting CAD mesh format files into VGMs and establishing them in FLUKA simply as well as accurately.

Evaluation of proton and carbon ion beam models in TReatment Planning for Particles 4D (TRiP4D) referring to a commercial treatment planning system.

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of the treatment planning system (TPS) TRiP4D in reproducing doses computed by the clinically used TPS SyngoRT. METHODS: Proton and carbon ion beam models in TRiP4D were converted from SyngoRT. Cubic plans with different depths in a water-tank phantom (WP) and previously treated and experimentally verified patient plans from SyngoRT were recalculated in TRiP4D. The target mean dose deviation (ΔDmean,T) and global gamma index (2%-2 mm for the absorbed dose and 3%-3mm for the RBE-weighted dose with 10% threshold) were evaluated. RESULTS: The carbon and proton absorbed dose gamma passing rates (γ-PRs) were ≥99.93% and ΔDmean,T smaller than -0.22%. On average, the RBE-weighted dose Dmean,T was -1.26% lower for TRiP4D than SyngoRT for cubic plans. In TRiP4D, the faster analytical 'low dose approximation' (Krämer, 2006) was used, while SyngoRT used a stochastic implementation (Krämer, 2000). The average ΔDmean, T could be reduced to -0.59% when applying the same biological effect calculation algorithm. However, the dose recalculation time increased by a factor of 79-477. ΔDmean,T variation up to -2.27% and -2.79% was observed for carbon absorbed and RBE-weighted doses in patient plans. The γ-PRs were ≥93.92% and ≥91.83% for patient plans, except for one proton beam with a range shifter (γ-PR of 64.19%). CONCLUSION: The absorbed dose between TRiP4D and SyngoRT were identical for both proton and carbon ion plans in the WP. Compared to SyngoRT, TRiP4D underestimated the target RBE-weighted dose; however more efficient in RBE-weighted dose calculation. Large variation for proton beam with range shifter was observed. TRiP4D will be used to evaluate doses delivered to moving targets. Uncertainties inherent to the 4D-dose reconstruction calculation are expected to be significantly larger than the dose errors reported here. For this reason, the residual differences between TRiP4D and SyngoRT observed in this study are considered acceptable. The study was approved by the Institutional Research Board of Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (approval number SPHIC-MP-2020-04, RS).

Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance.

Particle therapy is a rapidly growing field in cancer therapy. Worldwide, over 100 centers are in operation, and more are currently in construction phase. The interest in particle therapy is founded in the superior target dose conformity and healthy tissue sparing achievable through the particles' inverse depth dose profile. This physical advantage is, however, opposed by increased complexity and cost of particle therapy facilities. Particle therapy, especially with heavier ions, requires large and costly equipment to accelerate the particles to the desired treatment energy and steer the beam to the patient. A significant portion of the cost for a treatment facility is attributed to the gantry, used to enable different beam angles around the patient for optimal healthy tissue sparing. Instead of a gantry, a rotating chair positioning system paired with a fixed horizontal beam line presents a suitable cost-efficient alternative. Chair systems have been used already at the advent of particle therapy, but were soon dismissed due to increased setup uncertainty associated with the upright position stemming from the lack of dedicated image guidance systems. Recently, treatment chairs gained renewed interest due to the improvement in beam delivery, commercial availability of vertical patient CT imaging and improved image guidance systems to mitigate the problem of anatomical motion in seated treatments. In this review, economical and clinical reasons for an upright patient positioning system are discussed. Existing designs targeted for particle therapy are reviewed, and conclusions are drawn on the design and construction of chair systems and associated image guidance. Finally, the different aspects from literature are channeled into recommendations for potential upright treatment layouts, both for retrofitting and new facilities.

The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X-direction while keeping consistent in the Y-direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ-index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated. RESULTS: The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from -15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ-index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%-2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a -40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high-dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon-ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%.

Indications of IMRT, PRT and CIRT for HCC from comparisons of dosimetry and normal tissue complication possibility.

PURPOSE: To identify the indications for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) irradiated by intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT), proton radiotherapy (PRT) or carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by comparing of dosimetric parameters and incidences of classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). METHODS: In all, 40 HCCs were divided into group A (tumors located > 1 cm away from gastrointestinal [GI] tract), and group B (tumors located < 1 cm away from GI tract). The prescribed curative doses were 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 10 fractions for group A, and 67.5 Gy (RBE) in 15 fractions for group B. IMRT, PRT and CIRT plans were separately generated to reach the curative doses and coverage. Dosimetric parameters evaluated were mean dose to normal liver (MDTNL) and the volume of normal liver receiving more than 1 Gy (RBE) (V1). Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model was used to determine the incidences of classic RILD, and Power model of non-linear regression, to estimate the tumor volume that could be irradiated with the curative doses within dose constraint of MDTNL. RESULTS: With comparable target doses, the MDTNL (Gy [RBE]) were 18.8 ± 3.7, 13.5 ± 3.1 and 12.8 ± 2.7 in group A and 24.9 ± 7.1, 18.2 ± 3.7 and 17.5 ± 3.7 in group B, respectively, for IMRT, PRT and CIRT. The classic RILD incidences (%) were 22.3 ± 30.0 in IMRT, 2.3 ± 4.9 in PRT and 1.2 ± 2.4 in CIRT. V1 (%) were 89.9 ± 8.8, 43.0 ± 10.2 and 45.9 ± 8.8, respectively, for IMRT, PRT and CIRT. CONCLUSIONS: PRT and CIRT could spare the liver more than IMRT. IMRT could deliver the curative doses to HCC up to a diameter of 7.9 cm; PRT, up to 13.2 cm; and CIRT, up to 14.8 cm.

Dosimetric comparison between carbon, proton and photon radiation for renal retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma recurrence or metastasis after radical nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the dosimetric difference between various modalities in the radiation treatment for renal retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma recurrence or metastasis (RRSTSRM) after radical nephrectomy, and assess the dosimetric advantage on protecting the organs at risk (OARs) in the carbon and proton radiotherapy for the patients with a single kidney. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with RRSTSRM who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled in this study. Carbon, proton, and photon radiotherapy were implemented for treatment planning. The prescription dose was fulfilled by simultaneously integrated boosting technique, with giving the planning target volume-1 (PTV-1) 51Gy (RBE) and planning target volume-2 (PTV-2) 60 Gy (RBE). Doses in the patient's spinal cord, stomach, duodenum, bowel, colon, and contralateral kidney were evaluated. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the duodenum, bowel, colon, and contralateral kidney was derived under Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) estimation. RESULTS: In the carbon plans, the percentage volume of 95% prescription dose (V95%) covering PTV-1 (PTV-2) was 95.93% ± 3.42% (95.61% ± 4.26%). No significant dosimetric difference on the target was obtained between the four radiation modalities (P > .05). The percentage volume of receiving 40 Gy (RBE) [V40Gy (RBE)] in the duodenum could be reduced from 12.94% ± 15.99% in the IMRT plans to 6.36% ± 8.79% (8.44% ± 12.35%) in the carbon (proton) plans (P < .05). The V40Gy (RBE) in the bowel could be reduced from 13.48% ± 13.12% in the IMRT plans to 7.04% ± 9.32% (7.34% ± 9.89%) in the carbon (proton) plans (P < .05). The mean value of NTCP for the duodenum was 0.43 ± 0.47 (0.45 ± 0.48) by using carbon (proton) radiation. The value was 0.05 (0.03) lower than the IMRT plans on average, with a reduction of 0.20 (0.13) for the patients with lesions <5 mm away from the duodenum. The mean doses of the contralateral kidney were 0.28 ± 0.37 Gy (RBE) [0.28 ± 0.40 Gy (RBE)] in the IMCT (IMPT) plans, which was 92.43% (92.43%) lower than the value in the IMRT plans respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional radiation techniques, particle radiotherapy of carbon and proton could significantly spare more OARs in the treatment for RRSTSRM after radical nephrectomy. Patients, especially those whose residuals are close to the duodenum would potentially benefit from the particle radiation therapy for RRSTSRM on the decrease in radiation-related side-effect.

A Comparative Study of Two In Vivo PET Verification Methods in Clinical Cases.

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) range verification is an important method that can help improve the confidence in proton therapy for clinical applications. Two kinds of verification methods are implemented and compared based on clinical cases in this study. METHOD: The study is conducted on 14 breast cancer patients following proton irradiation treatment. Verification is done by calculating the depth error between the numerically predicted values with the measured PET image along the beam direction. Point-based and segment-based methods are applied and compared. The verification results are presented as depth error means and standard deviations in a region of interest (ROI). RESULTS: The mean value of the depth error of all 14 cases is within the range of [-3, 3] mm for both point-based and segment-based methods, and only one case result calculated by the point-based method is slightly beyond -3 mm. When comparing the mean depth error from the two methods, the paired t-test result shows that the p-value is 0.541, and the standard deviation of the segment-based method is smaller than that of the point-based method. CONCLUSION: In breast cancer case verification application, point-based and segment-based methods show no significant difference in the mean value of results. Both methods can quantify the accuracy of proton radiotherapy to the millimeter level.

Clinical Implementation of a 6D Treatment Chair for Fixed Ion Beam Lines.

PURPOSE: To verify the practicality and safety of a treatment chair with six degrees of freedom (6DTC) through demonstrating the efficacy of the workflow in clinical settings and analyzing the obtained technical data, including intra-fraction patient movement during the use of the 6DTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical study was designed and conducted to test the clinical treatment workflow and the safety of the 6DTC. Based on the demonstrated dosimetric advantages, fifteen patients with head and neck tumors were selected and treated with the 6DTC. The positional error at the first beam position (PE-B1) and the second beam position (PE-B2) were analyzed and compared with the results from daily quality assurance (QA) procedures of the 6DTC and imaging system performed each day before clinical treatment. The intra-fraction patient movement was derived from the total patient alignment positional error and the QA data based on a Gaussian distribution formulism. RESULTS: The QA results showed sub-millimeter mechanical accuracy of the 6DTC over the course of the clinical study. For 150 patient treatment fractions, the mean deviations between PE-B1 and PE-B2 were 0.13mm (SD 0.88mm), 0.25mm (SD 1.17mm), -0.57mm (SD 0.85mm), 0.02° (SD 0.35°), 0.00° (SD 0.37°), and -0.02° (SD 0.37°) in the x, y, z (translational), and u, v, w (rotational) directions, respectively. The calculated intra-fraction patient movement was -0.08mm (SD 0.56mm), 0.71mm (SD 1.12mm), -0.52mm (SD 0.84mm), 0.10° (SD 0.32°), 0.09° (SD 0.36°), and -0.04° (SD 0.36°) in the x, y, z, u, v, w directions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The performance stability of the 6DTC was satisfactory. The position accuracy and intra-fraction patient movement in an upright posture with the 6DTC were verified and found adequate for clinical implementation.

Conversion and validation of rectal constraints for prostate carcinoma receiving hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy with a local effect model.

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to establish the local effect model (LEM) rectum constraints for 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in patients with localized prostate carcinoma (PCA) using microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM)-defined and LEM-defined constraints for 16-fraction CIRT. METHODS: We analyzed 40 patients with PCA who received 16- or 12-fraction CIRT at our center. Linear-quadratic (LQ) and RBE-conversion models were employed to convert the constraints into various fractionations and biophysical models. Based on them, the MKM LQ strategy converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction CIRT using the LQ model. Then, MKM constraints were converted to LEM using the RBE-conversion model. Meanwhile the LEM LQ strategy converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to LEM using the RBE-conversion model. Then, LEM constraints were converted from 16-fraction constraints to the rectum constraints for 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction CIRT using the LQ model. The LEM constraints for 16- and 12-fraction CIRT were evaluated using rectum doses and clinical follow-up. To adapt them for the MKM LQ strategy, CNAO LEM constraints were first converted to MKM constraints using the RBE-conversion model. RESULTS: The NIRS (i.e. DMKM|v, V-20%, 10%, 5%, and 0%) and CNAO rectum constraints (i.e. DLEM|v, V-10 cc, 5 cc, and 1 cc) were converted for 12-fraction CIRT using the MKM LQ strategy to LEM 37.60, 49.74, 55.27, and 58.01 Gy (RBE), and 45.97, 51.70, and 55.97 Gy (RBE), and using the LEM LQ strategy to 39.55, 53.08, 58.91, and 61.73 Gy (RBE), and 49.14, 55.30, and 59.69 Gy (RBE). We also established LEM constraints for 8- and 4-fraction CIRT. The 10-patient RBE-conversion model was comparable to 30-patient model. Eight patients who received 16-fraction CIRT exceeded the corresponding rectum constraints; the others were within the constraints. After a median follow-up of 10.8 months (7.1-20.8), No ≥ G1 late rectum toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The LEM rectum constraints from the MKM LQ strategy were more conservative and might serve as the reference for hypofractionated CIRT. However, Long-term follow-up plus additional patients is necessary.

Development of a Monte Carlo beam model for raster scanning proton beams and dosimetric comparison.

PURPOSE: To develop a Monte Carlo (MC) beam model for raster scanning proton beams for dose verification purposes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: MC program FLUKA was used in the model. The nominal energy, momentum spread and beam angular distribution in the model were determined by matching the simulation profiles with the measured integral depth dose (IDD) and in air spot size. Dosimetric comparison was done by comparing the measured and simulated dose distributions. The 1 D dose profile of cubic Spread Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) plans, and the 2 D dose distribution of previously treated breast cancer patients' clinical plans were measured by using Pinpoint chambers and 2 D array ionization chambers, respectively. Corresponding DICOM plan information was utilized for MC simulation. RESULTS: The MC results showed good agreement with measurements for the SOBP plans. The absolute comparison of the absorbed dose difference between the MC and the measurement was 0.93%±0.88%. For the patient plans, the overall passing rate of the gamma index analysis (γ-PR) between the MC simulation and measurement with the 2%-2 mm criteria was 97.78%, and only 1 case had a γ-PR less than 90%. With the 3%-3 mm criteria, γ-PR was never below 99% for all cases with and without the range shifter. CONCLUSIONS: This work described a method for adapting a MC simulation model for a raster scanning proton beam. The good concordance between the simulations and measurements shows that the MC model is an accurate and reliable method. It has the potential to be used for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) to reduce the beam time for the measurements in water.

Development of an isocentric rotating chair positioner to treat patients of head and neck cancer at upright seated position with multiple nonplanar fields in a fixed carbon-ion beamline.

PURPOSE: An isocentric rotating chair for a positioner was developed as a nongantry solution to provide multiple nonplanar radiation fields with a maximum tilt of 20 ∘ for treating head and neck cancer patients at an upright seated position in a fixed carbon-ion beamline. METHODS: The preclinical validation of the chair was present for this study funded by a grant through the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) in Shanghai, China. The chair was installed in SPHIC. A concept of parallel kinematic was adopted to build the chair. Three movement subunits of the chair are a Stewart hexapod platform and two modules for three-dimensional translation and 360 ∘ rotation. This chair can position patients with a tilt up to 20 ∘ over a continuous 360 ∘ rotation. Any weak structures within each subunit were investigated by industrial static/dynamic simulations of used materials. After manufactured subunits were assembled in a factory, a series of executed six degree-of-freedom (DoF) displacements were measured by using a laser-based dynamic tracking system (LDTS) for the initial validation. Deviations between measured and required displacements, referred to as displacement deviation, were used to evaluate the displacement accuracy of the chair. After satisfying the initial validation in the factory, the chair was disassembled and installed in our treatment room. The displacement accuracy of the chair was revalidated by using the LDTS. Then, an integration validation of the chair was conducted to position a head phantom by using our image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) system. Because the positioning accuracy of our IGRT system achieved a clinical tolerance of 1.0 mm and 1.0 ∘ only for a pitch/roll of <5 ∘ , the integration validation was conducted on 36 planned fields with a 5 ∘ tilt evenly over 360 ∘ rotation. RESULTS: To fulfill the general purpose of positioner, the chair allows the execution of any displacement over a cubic treatment volume with a length of 500 mm. Materials selected by simulations met required strengths under all circumstances of the clinical usage. The displacement accuracy of the chair satisfied the tolerance of 0.3 mm in-translation and 0.3 ∘ in-rotation during the initial validation in the factory. After the chair was installed in our institute, a linear displacement deviation of +/-0.6 mm was observed over +/-200 mm displacements in horizontal X/Y axes. After correcting the linear deviation, the displacement deviations of the chair for horizontal and vertical X/Y/Z axes were within 0.5 mm and 0.5 ∘ for its revalidation. During the integration validation, the displacement deviation of the chair was 0.8 mm and 0.6 ∘ when positioning a head phantom for the 36 fields with a 5 ∘ tilt. CONCLUSIONS: The chair achieved the required clinical tolerance for the clinical application. The tilt angle was limited to within 5 ∘ to treat patients through a specific treatment workflow with a proper daily quality assurance program during a clinical trial, started in May 2019. An integration validation with a 20 ∘ tilt will be conducted in the near future to realize the full potential of the isocentric rotating chair.

Performance of a 6D Treatment Chair for Patient Positioning in an Upright Posture for Fixed Ion Beam Lines.

Purpose: To evaluate the mechanical accuracy and the robustness of position alignment under x-ray-based image guidance of a treatment chair with six degrees of freedom (6DTC) which was developed for patient treatment in an upright posture at fixed horizontal beam lines in particle (proton, carbon ion, or others) radiotherapy facilities. Method and Material: The positional accuracy including translational and axial rotational accuracy of the 6DTC was evaluated by using a Vicon Motion Capture System (VMCS). Stability of the chair rotation isocenter was determined by a CCD camera with an in-house developed software. The tests were carried out to examine two key motion components of the 6DTC: a floor/rail-mount 360°-rotating platform and a 6-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) platform. The measurement results were compared to that of a commercial clinical robot couch. The accuracy of position alignment, simulating the actual clinical protocol, through an Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) system was studied at the pre-treatment position and beam specific treatment position. Results: The translational accuracy was 0.12 mm (SD 0.07 mm) for the 6DOF platform. The rotational accuracy was 0.04° (SD 0.03°) and 0.02° (SD 0.02°) for the 6DOF platform and the 360° -rotating platform, respectively. The displacement between the chair rotation center and the room isocenter center was no more than 0.18 mm in all three rotational axes. Combined with an x-ray-based IGRT system, the treatment alignment test with a rigid phantom yielded a total positional accuracy of 0.23 mm (SD 0.17 mm) and 0.14° (SD 0.14°) at treatment position. Conclusions: On the basis of the rigid phantom study, the 6DTC showed comparable accuracy to the robot treatment couch. Combining with the IGRT, the 6DTC can provide position alignment with submillimeter accuracy for rigid phantom in upright posture.

RBE-weighted dose conversions for carbon ionradiotherapy between microdosimetric kinetic model and local effect model for the targets and organs at risk in prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish curves for the conversion of RBE-weighted doses for targets and organs at risk (OARs) from the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) calculation to that of the local effect model I (LEM) for carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for prostate carcinoma (PCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in the experimental treatment planning system (eTPS, V8A, Raystation, Sweden), which incorporates both MKM and LEM. CIRT plans from 10 PCA patients were collected. There were 5 steps to establish the curves: (1) design MKM plans in eTPS; (2) recalculate the physical doses from MKM to LEM and create a LEM plan in eTPS; (3) plot the RBE-weighted MKM to LEM conversion curves; (4) convert the MKM rectum constraint dose volume histogram (DVH) from NIRS to a LEM DVH; and (5) compare patients' rectum DVHs and follow-up with the converted constraint DVH. RESULTS: The conversion factors for MKM doses of 0.18 Gy (RBE) to 4.55 Gy (RBE) per fraction to LEM doses were 2.72-1.06. For fraction sizes of >1 Gy (RBE), the conversion factors matched Fossati's curve and for fraction sizes of <1.00 Gy (RBE) the values were on the extrapolated Fossati's curve. A LEM rectum constraint DVH was established. Ten patients' rectum DVHs were all lower than LEM constraint DVHs. No complications were reported clinically. CONCLUSION: For PCA receiving CIRT, the RBE-weighted doses using MKM for targets and OARs could be converted to LEM doses using conversion curves.

Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module.

Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is a widely used method of proton therapy verification. In this study, a proton radiotherapy accuracy verification process was developed by comparing predicted and measured PET data to verify the correctness of PET prediction and was tested at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center. Method: Irradiation was performed on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. There were two dose groups, to which 2 and 4 Gy doses were delivered, and each dose group had different designed dose depths ranging from 5 to 20 cm. The predicted PET results were obtained using a PET prediction calculation module. The measured data were collected with a PET/computed tomography device. The predicted and measured PET data were normalized to similar PET amplitude values before comparison and were compared using depth and lateral profiles for the position error. The error was evaluated at the position corresponding to 50% of the maximum on the PET curves. The mean and standard deviation were calculated based on the data sampled in the scoring area. Gamma index analysis is also applied in the comparison. Results: In the depth comparison, the 2 and 4 Gy dose cases yielded similar mean depth errors between 1 and -1 mm, and the deviation was <2 mm. In the lateral comparison, the 2 Gy cases had a mean lateral error around 1 mm, and the 4 Gy cases had a mean lateral error <1 mm, with a standard deviation <1 mm for both the 2 and 4 Gy cases. All the cases have a gamma passing rate over 95%. Conclusion: The comparison of these PMMA phantom cases revealed good agreement between the predicted and measured PET data, with depth and lateral position errors <2 mm in total, considering the uncertainty. The comparison results demonstrate that the PET predictions obtained in PMMA phantom tests for single proton beam therapy verification are reliable and that the research can be extended to verification in human body treatment with further investigation.

Development of a Voxel-based Chinese reference female phantom from color photographs for radiation dosimetry applications.

The objective of this study was to develop a Voxel-based Chinese Reference female Phantom (VCRP-woman) from high-resolution color photographs acquired from an adult female cadaver. Forty-six organs/tissues, including all radiosensitive organs/tissues specified in the 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), were either segmented manually or subjected to semi-automatic segmentation as seen in color photographs of the unadjusted female. A C++ program was developed to adjust the masses of the organs/tissues to values applicable to the Chinese Reference adult female. The resulting VCRP-woman consists of more than 106 million voxels, each with dimensions of 1.03 mm × 1.03 mm × 1.95 mm. Organ absorbed dose and effective dose conversion coefficients for monoenergetic photons from 0.015-10 MeV were calculated for several reference irradiation geometries (anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior, left-lateral, rotational, and isotropic) by Monte Carlo radiation transport. The results for the VCRP-woman were compared to those of the original (or unadjusted) female voxel phantom as well as the ICRP Publication 110 adult reference female computational phantom.