Predictors of Facial Pain and Headache Associated With Cryotherapy Ablation of the Posterior Nasal Nerve for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE: Cryotherapy ablation of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) for treatment of patients with refractory chronic rhinitis (CR) is associated with postoperative facial pain and headache. This study sought to understand factors that may contribute to the development of this adverse effect. METHODS: Patients undergoing PNN cryotherapy ablation for refractory CR at a single institution from January 2018 to August 2023 were included. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected via chart review and interview. Student's T-test and Chi-square tests were used to assess the significance of quantitative and categorical data, respectively (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS:  Forty-eight patients underwent cryotherapy ablation. Twenty-eight patients (58%) reported having facial pain and headache (adverse effect group) immediately post-procedurally. The average age of the adverse effect group was 54.9 years (SD: 17.8 years) which was significantly lower (p=0.002) than the asymptomatic group (69.7 years, SD: 8.7 years). Female patients were significantly more likely to experience this adverse event than males (p=0.04). Moreover, Caucasian females were significantly more likely to experience this adverse effect when compared to all patients experiencing the adverse effect (n=15, p=0.04). Previous diagnosis of migraine disorder was more common in the adverse effect group (28%) compared to the asymptomatic group (15%) but not statistically significant (p=0.26). Previous migraine, trigeminal neuralgia, or headache disorder diagnoses were not significantly correlated with adverse effect prevalence (p = 0.26, 0.24, 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSION: Given the relative immediacy and severity of this adverse effect, physicians should strongly consider these factors when counseling and selecting certain patient groups for this procedure.

What Questions Do Patients Ask About Biologic Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis With Nasal Polyps?

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the questions commonly asked online about biologic therapies for use in treatment of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and the quality of the available content. Methods: Most common search terms were identified via Google Trends. People Also Ask (PAA) questions were identified and extracted with their associated website using an online data-scraping program [Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Minion, Keywords Everywhere]. Sources were evaluated using Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE, higher number = better) score for readability; Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria for quality assessment (0-4, 4 = all criteria met). Results: A total of 143 unique PAA questions and unique websites were identified. Questions were organized into 3 categories: questions about biologic therapies overall (38.46%), about CRSwNP (37.76%), and about treatment options for CRSwNP (23.78%). Websites answering PAA questions were from commercial (60.14%), medical practice (13.99%), academic (13.29%), and government (12.59%) sources. FKGL scores found the average reading level to be at approximately a 12th grade level (SD = 3.297) alongside a low reading ease FRE score of 37.6 (SD = 16.77). Mean JAMA criteria scores were 0.9895 (SD = 0.848), indicating largely low-quality materials. Conclusion: Biologic therapies are a novel treatment option for CRSwNP, and participants are seeking more information about these treatments and disease state. Online resources regarding biologics should be presented at a lower reading level. Sources with evidence-based information are needed. Physicians should be aware of these limitations in online material and counsel accordingly by curating and directing patients to good sources.Level of Evidence: Step 4.

Engineering Toolbox for Systematic Design of PolyHIPE Architecture.

Polymerization of high internal phase emulsions (polyHIPEs) is a well-established method for the production of high porosity foams. Researchers are often regulated to using a time-intensive trial and error approach to achieve target pore architectures. In this work, we performed a systematic study to identify the relative effects of common emulsion parameters on pore architecture (mixing speed, surfactant concentration, organic phase viscosity, molecular hydrophobicity). Across different macromer chemistries, the largest magnitude of change in pore size was observed across surfactant concentration (~6 fold, 5-20 wt%), whereas changing mixing speeds (~4 fold, 500-2000 RPM) displayed a reduced effect. Furthermore, it was observed that organic phase viscosity had a marked effect on pore size (~4 fold, 6-170 cP) with no clear trend observed with molecular hydrophobicity in this range (logP = 1.9-4.4). The efficacy of 1,4-butanedithiol as a reactive diluent was demonstrated and provides a means to reduce organic phase viscosity and increase pore size without affecting polymer fraction of the resulting foam. Overall, this systematic study of the microarchitectural effects of these macromers and processing variables provides a framework for the rational design of polyHIPE architectures that can be used to accelerate design and meet application needs across many sectors.