Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection with acetic acid--interobserver variability between nurse and physician.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the test performance of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) by a physician and nurse so as to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of training a nurse in interpreting VIA. METHODS: It was a cross sectional study conducted in the colposcopy clinic at the University teaching hospital. 406 women who fulfilled the selection criteria underwent VIA done by both physician and nurse and the findings were interpreted independently. This was followed by colposcopy done by a gynecologist blinded to the results of VIA and directed biopsy was taken if indicated. The diagnostic efficacy was calculated separately for physician and nurse using threshold of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and above and concordance of results between the physician and nurse was determined by kappa statistics. RESULTS: VIA by physician had a higher sensitivity (88.89% versus 80%) and a higher specificity (69.81% versus 54.85%) with disease threshold of CIN 2 and above. The concordance of results showed moderate agreement (kappa=0.366). CONCLUSION: Trained nurses can be an effective alternative human resource for cervical cancer screening using VIA as a preliminary screening method. Intensive training and periodic reinforcement sessions are needed so as to reduce the false positive results.

Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection with acetic acid - interobserver variability between nurse and physician.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the test performance of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) by a physician and nurse so as to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of training nurses in interpreting VIA. METHODS: This cross sectional study was conducted in the colposcopy clinic at the University teaching hospital. A total of 406 women who fulfilled the selection criteria underwent VIA done by both physician and nurse and the findings were interpreted independently. This was followed by colposcopy carried out by a gynecologist blinded to the results of VIA and a directed biopsy was taken if indicated. The diagnostic efficacy was calculated separately for physician and nurse using threshold of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and above and concordance of results between the physician and nurse was determined by kappa statistics. RESULTS: VIA by physician had a higher sensitivity (88.9% versus 80.0%) and a higher specificity (69.8% versus 54.9%) with a disease threshold of CIN 2 and above. The concordance of results showed moderate agreement (kappa=0.366). CONCLUSION: Trained nurses can be an effective alternative human resource for cervical cancer screening using VIA as a preliminary screening method. Intensive training and periodic reinforcement sessions are needed so as to reduce false positive results.

A novel technique of selective uterine devascularization before myomectomy at the time of cesarean section: a pilot study.

Selective uterine devascularization before myomectomy at the time of cesarean section is a novel technique that facilitates myomectomy and is a safe procedure avoiding the need for subsequent surgery.

Correlation of colposcopy using Reid colposcopic index with histopathology- a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic efficacy of colposcopy & determine the strength of correlation between colposcopic impression using the Reid Colposcopic Index (RCI) and histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective cross sectional study carried out in the colposcopy clinic at KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Belgaum from January 2008 to June 2009. A total of 268 women who fulfilled the selection criteria were included in the study. All women underwent colposcopy and a diagnosis was made based on RCI. Colposcopy directed biopsy was obtained from the abnormal areas. In cases where colposcopy did not reveal any lesion, a four quadrant biopsy from the squamocolumnar junction was taken, which served as a gold standard. RESULTS: Three women who had an unsatisfactory colposcopy & eleven women with the diagnosis of cervical cancer were excluded from the analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value & negative predictive value of colposcopy with CIN 1 as a disease threshold was 88.5%, 86.2%, 77% & 93.5% respectively. With CIN 2 as a disease threshold the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value & negative predictive value of colposcopy were 85.2%, 99.6%, 95.8% & 98.3% respectively. The degree of correlation between colposcopic impression using RCI & histopathology was high (k=0.73). CONCLUSION: Colposcopy is an indispensable tool in the diagnosis of precancerous lesions & the good correlation between colposcopic impression using RCI & histopathology makes it a reproducible technique which is easy to implement in colposcopy clinics.