Editorial Commentary: Cadaveric Biomechanical Orthopaedic Research Is Essential and Requires Quality and Validity Metrics.

Evidence-based medicine is the commanding philosophy of patient care in the field of orthopaedic surgery, and analysis of clinical research is facilitated by instruments and scales developed for assessing methodologic quality and validity of conclusions. In contrast, little consideration has been given to developing metrics to assess the quality and validity of orthopaedic ex vivo and laboratory research. This is easier said than done because these studies may be heterogeneous and complex in design, and methodologic details may not be intuitive to (non-engineer) readers. The recently described Biomechanics Objective Basic Science Quality Assessment Tool (BOBQAT) represents a reliable means to assess cadaveric biomechanical studies. The BOBQAT emphasizes essential study elements including a clinically relevant, answerable purpose; detailed description of the specimens studied; thorough description of surgical technique; and careful consideration of loading conditions including clinically relevant cyclic loading. The BOBQAT provides a logical recipe for the design of future studies, a mechanism of quality assessment for systematic reviews, and a framework for readers to assess biomechanical research consistent with the ethos of evidence-based medicine.

Editorial Commentary: Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Tibial Plafond Shows Generally Favorable Results.

Osteochondral lesions of the ankle are common, but only a small proportion of these lesions are found on the tibial plafond (osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond, ie, OLTP). By and large, surgical treatment strategies for OLTP have been derived from techniques employed for those of the talus (ie, osteochondral lesion of the talus). Despite the clinical success of surgical treatments for osteochondral lesion of the talus, namely bone marrow stimulation, it is quite possible that OLTP may not respond similarly, given the unique anatomy and biomechanical properties of the tibia. To this end, the literature surrounding OLTP is relatively sparse, and studies evaluating the clinical and radiographic outcomes of treatments specific to OLTP are necessary. Still, if it works for the talus, it seems sensible that it could work for the plafond. Pending future research, there is no need to reinvent the wheel.

Editorial Commentary: Optimizing Surgical Management of Ankle Fractures: Is Arthroscopy the Answer?

The surgical management of ankle fractures can be an unforgiving endeavor. Subtle malreductions in fracture fragments lead to significant deviations in joint reactive forces and, consequently, accelerated arthritis. The diagnosis of associated ligamentous pathology, such as deltoid and syndesmotic injuries, is often difficult and ideal surgical management is debated. Ankle fractures that are seemingly optimally managed using traditional surgical techniques may remain persistently painful and function poorly-a scenario that begs the question, was there more to the injury than met the eye (or radiographs)? Here, unrecognized concomitant intra-articular injuries and subtle surgical malreductions have been implicated. In my practice, concurrent ankle arthroscopy at the time of definitive acute ankle fracture reduction and fixation results in improved accuracy of reduction, evaluation and management of concomitant syndesmotic and ligamentous injuries, assessment and treatment of occult intra-articular injuries, options for less-invasive fixation techniques through arthroscopic reduction, and a means to provide prognostic patient information. I typically reserve its use for fracture patterns that have been more closely associated with intra-articular injuries: high-energy mechanism injuries, Weber B and C fibula fractures, and those with a high likelihood of syndesmotic disruption based on preoperative imaging. Despite these intuitive advantages, concurrent ankle arthroscopy for acute fracture fixation is not routinely performed by most orthopedic surgeons, and a relative dearth of literature regarding its use and clinical impact remains.

Lateral Transfer of the Flexor Digitorum Longus for Peroneal Tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported midterm outcomes after single-stage flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon transfer to the lateral foot for irreparable rupture of the peroneal tendons. METHODS: Over a 7-year period (2008-2015), 25 consecutive patients underwent transfer of the FDL to the fifth metatarsal for irreparable peroneal tendon tears. Of these, 15 patients were available for inclusion with a mean follow-up of 53.7 ± 23.3 months, mean age at surgery of 48.4 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.8 kg/m2. Patients completed the pain visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and participated in range of motion, peak force, and peak power testing. RESULTS: All 15 patients were satisfied with their surgery and reported a reduction in their pain level with a decreased VAS of 5.6 ± 2.5. The mean FFI was 12.8 ± 9.2, the SMFA Function Index was 12.4 ± 8, and the mean SMFA Bothersome Index was 11.5 ± 11. The mean FAAM was 86.4 ± 9.7. Patients had on average 58% less eversion and 28% less inversion compared with the nonoperative side. Isometric peak torque and isotonic peak velocity were 38.4% and 28.8% less compared with the contralateral side, respectively. The average power in the operative limb was diminished by 56% compared with the nonoperative limb. CONCLUSION: In this small case series with midterm follow-up, FDL transfer to the lateral foot for significant, irreparable peroneal tendinopathy was an effective and durable treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Revision of the Failed Bunion Surgery.

Complications and failures of corrective surgery for hallux valgus are not infrequent, and their reported rates vary widely. This is at least partly because of the variety of surgical techniques performed as well as a lack of consensus regarding what constitutes a successful outcome. Some of the most commonly encountered reasons for failure include recurrence, hallux varus, nonunion, and malunion. These problems present a challenging scenario for both the patient and surgeon. A comprehensive understanding of these complications and a nuanced, critical analysis of each case is paramount to effective management of failed surgery for hallux valgus. There are several strategies for both minimizing complications in surgery for hallux valgus and salvaging a successful outcome through revision surgery.

Incidence of Nerve Injury After Hip Arthroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroscopy is a commonly performed procedure that carries a notable risk of nerve injury secondary to port placement and the use of axial traction. Sensory neurapraxia of the pudendal nerve and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is most common; however, sexual dysfunction and sciatic nerve injury has also been reported. Reported incidence of nerve injury ranges between 1.4% and 5% in the literature, but much of these data are based on unsolicited patient concerns. This study aimed to determine the true rate of nerve injury among this patient population through administration of a validated survey at multiple time points. METHODS: A prospective study of all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy requiring traction by a single surgeon at our institution was performed. These cases were the first 100 hip arthroscopies performed in practice by the surgeon. Before surgery, all patients were asked about the presence of neuropathic symptoms including sexual dysfunction through administration of a validated questionnaire. The same questionnaire was then administered at several time points postoperatively: on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 2, at the first follow-up visit, and if symptoms persisted, then at each follow-up appointment until resolution of the symptoms. Overall incidence of nerve injury was then calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate whether traction time, sex, body mass index (BMI), or technically demanding surgical skills affected the incidence. RESULTS: This study included a total of 100 patients with an average age of 29 (13 to 62) years and an average BMI of 25. Nerve injury was seen in 13 patients with an incidence of 13%. Specific nerves injured included the pudendal (9), lateral femoral cutaneous (2), sciatic (1), and superficial peroneal nerves (1). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a notable association between the risk of nerve injury and increased traction time, sex, or increased BMI. The technically demanding surgical skills was associated with a notable decrease in the traction time, but no notable difference in the risk of nerve injury was observed. Most nerve injuries resolved within 2 weeks (8 of 13), and all cases of nerve injury resolved within 9 months. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nerve injury after hip arthroscopy may be markedly higher than previously reported; however, resolution seems to occur as previously found in the literature. Patients should be educated regarding the risk of nerve injury during this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Minimal Incision/Minimally Invasive Medializing Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy.

Minimally invasive techniques are readily applicable to calcaneal osteotomies and have the potential to accomplish hindfoot correction equivalent to open procedures with less morbidity and pain. Use of a guidance jig makes the procedure more predictable. While most anatomic features of the procedure are the same as those with open techniques, special care must be taken to avoid neurovascular injury because there is no open exposure. Anatomic guidelines have been established for appropriately localizing the osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthroscopy for Osteochondral Lesions.

Small-joint arthroscopy has supplanted open procedures because it offers the potential for improvement in joint visualization, reduced scarring, and accelerated recovery. Despite these advantages, arthroscopy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is not commonly performed and reports of its use are lacking. The reason for this is not clear but may be because of perceived technical complexity and poorly defined indications. In our experience, however, arthroscopy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is a versatile procedure that facilitates treatment of many different pathologic processes through a minimally invasive approach with few complications. We present our technique for arthroscopic management of osteochondral lesions of the hallux.

Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fractures.

In many patients who undergo open reduction-internal fixation of ankle fractures, there is a failure to achieve good clinical outcomes despite radiographic evidence of anatomic reduction. One possible reason for this is the high incidence of concomitant intra-articular pathology associated with ankle fractures that may go unrecognized using traditional open approaches. Arthroscopy in the setting of acute operative management of ankle fractures provides a means to completely assess intra-articular pathology, as well as provide direct therapeutic intervention in many instances. Arthroscopic management techniques include debridement of loose intra-articular fragments, assisted fracture reduction, microfracture of chondral injuries, and assessment of syndesmotic stability. The indications for arthroscopy in the setting of ankle fractures have not been fully defined; however, it is our practice to perform an arthroscopic assessment of all ankle fractures requiring surgical intervention. We present a sample of our experience using this technique that shows the severity of intra-articular pathology that is often found and occurs even in association with fracture patterns with seemingly innocuous radiographic appearances.

Management of a large acetabular chondrolabral injury in a young patient with femoroacetabular impingement.

Patients with mixed-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome often have concomitant chondrolabral pathology in addition to the characteristic cam and pincer lesions. Unfortunately, these patients are typically young, and the pathology is localized to the weight-bearing dome of the acetabulum. Complete preoperative characterization of labral and cartilage lesions is often not possible even with advanced imaging techniques, and the full extent of the injury may not be appreciated without direct arthroscopic visualization. Thus management decisions regarding intra-articular pathology may not be possible until the time of surgery. Often, the cartilage and labral pathology in these young patients is part of a contiguous complex of tissue that separates from the underlying subchondral bone. We present an arthroscopic management technique for young patients with this pattern of injury. This includes limited debridement of loose labral and chondral tissue, labral repair to restore the suction-seal effect, microfracture to promote reparative tissue formation, and takedown of the underlying pathoanatomic cam and pincer lesions.

Using a structured, computer-administered questionnaire for evaluating health-related QOL with chronic lower extremity wounds.

Patients with chronic wounds of the lower extremity (CWLEs) often experience functional disability and emotional distress; incorporating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurements in clinical practice may improve understanding of chronic wound patients' healthcare needs. A computer-administered instrument that measures HRQoL variables in patients with CWLEs was developed to overcome common limitations to assessing HRQoL in this population. Face validity of the questionnaire variables assessing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being was obtained and a computer application to display the structured questionnaire on an electronic kiosk with touch-screen interface was developed. All patient responses are stored in the clinic's electronic health record system. To evaluate use of this system in a wound care clinic, 66 consecutive patients were asked to complete the questionnaire; of those, 64 participated. Internal consistency of the instrument across responses was estimated by the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 as 0.79. None of the patients requested help completing the questionnaire or working with the touch-screen interface. Patients most frequently reported frustration (63%), trouble sleeping (48%), anxiety (42%), and impaired mobility (41%), confirming that CWLEs negatively affect patient quality of life. These findings suggest that additional validation and reliability studies, including research to evaluate the relationship between HRQoL, protocols of care, and wound outcomes, are warranted.