Correcting Diagnostic Test Sensitivity and Specificity for Patient Misclassifications Resulting from Use of an Imperfect Reference Standard.

Investigational diagnostic tests are validated by using a reference standard (RS). If the RS is imperfect (i.e., it has sensitivity [Se] and/or specificity [Sp] < 1), incorrect values for the investigational test's Se and Sp may result because of patient misclassification by the RS. Formulas were derived to correct a test's Se and Sp that were determined by using an imperfect RS. The following derived formulas correct for misclassification and give the true numbers of disease-positive [nDP] and disease-negative patients [nDN] from the apparent number of disease-positive and disease-negative patients (anDP and anDN), and the Se and Sp of the RS (SeR, SpR): nDP = (anDP × SpR + anDN × SpR − anDN)/JR; nDN = (anDP × SeR + anDN × SeR − anDP)/JR, where JR is Youden's Index for the RS (JR = SeR + SpR − 1). The following derived formulas give the correct Se and Sp of an investigational test (SeI and SpI): SeI = (anTPI × SpR − nDP × SeR × SpR + nDP × JR + nDN × SpR2 − nDN × SpR − SpR × anTNI + anTNI)/(nDP × JR); SpI = (anTPI − anTPI × SeR + nDP × SeR2 − nDP × SeR − SeR × nDN × SpR + nDN × JR + SeR × anTNI)/(nDN × JR), where anTPI is the apparent number of true-positive test results, and anTNI is the apparent number of true-negative test results. The derived formulas correct for patient misclassification by an imperfect RS and give the correct values of a diagnostic test's Se and Sp.

Initial Physician Experience with [18F]Flutemetamol Amyloid PET Imaging Following Availability for Routine Clinical Use in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Brain amyloid is a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). By visualizing brain amyloid, positron emission tomography (PET) may influence the diagnostic assessment and management of patients with cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: As part of a Japanese post-approval study to measure the safety of [18F]flutemetamol PET, the association of amyloid PET results with changes in diagnosis and diagnostic confidence was assessed. METHODS: Fifty-seven subjects were imaged for amyloid PET using [18F]flutemetamol at a single Japanese memory clinic. The cognitive diagnosis and referring physician's confidence in the diagnosis were recorded before and after availability of PET results. Imaging started approximately 90 minutes after [18F]flutemetamol administration with approximately 185 MBq injected. PET images were acquired for 30 minutes. RESULTS: Amyloid PET imaging led to change in diagnosis in 15/44 clinical subjects (34%). Mean diagnostic confidence increased by approximately 20%, from 73% pre-scan to 93% post-scan, and this rise was fairly consistent across the main patient subgroups (mild cognitive impairment, AD, and non-AD) irrespective of the pre-scan diagnosis and scan result. CONCLUSION: The study examined the utility of amyloid PET imaging in a Japanese clinical cohort and highlighted the use of an etiological diagnosis in the presence of the amyloid scan. [18F]Flutemetamol PET led to a change in diagnosis in over 30% of cases and to an increase in diagnostic confidence by approximately 20% consistent with other reports.

Use of Flutemetamol F 18-Labeled Positron Emission Tomography and Other Biomarkers to Assess Risk of Clinical Progression in Patients With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Importance: Patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) may progress to clinical Alzheimer disease (AD), remain stable, or revert to normal. Earlier progression to AD among patients who were ß-amyloid positive vs those who were ß-amyloid negative has been previously observed. Current research now accepts that a combination of biomarkers could provide greater refinement in the assessment of risk for clinical progression. Objective: To evaluate the ability of flutemetamol F 18 and other biomarkers to assess the risk of progression from aMCI to probable AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter cohort study, from November 11, 2009, to January 16, 2014, patients with aMCI underwent positron emission tomography (PET) at baseline followed by local clinical assessments every 6 months for up to 3 years. Patients with aMCI (365 screened; 232 were eligible) were recruited from 28 clinical centers in Europe and the United States. Physicians remained strictly blinded to the results of PET, and the standard of truth was an independent clinical adjudication committee that confirmed or refuted local assessments. Flutemetamol F 18-labeled PET scans were read centrally as either negative or positive by 5 blinded readers with no knowledge of clinical status. Statistical analysis was conducted from February 19, 2014, to January 26, 2018. Interventions: Flutemetamol F 18-labeled PET at baseline followed by up to 6 clinical visits every 6 months, as well as magnetic resonance imaging and multiple cognitive measures. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time from PET to probable AD or last follow-up was plotted as a Kaplan-Meier survival curve; PET scan results, age, hippocampal volume, and aMCI stage were entered into Cox proportional hazards logistic regression analyses to identify variables associated with progression to probable AD. Results: Of 232 patients with aMCI (118 women and 114 men; mean [SD] age, 71.1 [8.6] years), 98 (42.2%) had positive results detected on PET scan. By 36 months, the rates of progression to probable AD were 36.2% overall (81 of 224 patients), 53.6% (52 of 97) for patients with positive results detected on PET scan, and 22.8% (29 of 127) for patients with negative results detected on PET scan. Hazard ratios for association with progression were 2.51 (95% CI, 1.57-3.99; P < .001) for a positive ß-amyloid scan alone (primary outcome measure), 5.60 (95% CI, 3.14-9.98; P < .001) with additional low hippocampal volume, and 8.45 (95% CI, 4.40-16.24; P < .001) when poorer cognitive status was added to the model. Conclusions and Relevance: A combination of positive results of flutemetamol F 18-labeled PET, low hippocampal volume, and cognitive status corresponded with a high probability of risk of progression from aMCI to probable AD within 36 months.

Performance of [18F]flutemetamol amyloid imaging against the neuritic plaque component of CERAD and the current (2012) NIA-AA recommendations for the neuropathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Performance of the amyloid tracer [18F]flutemetamol was evaluated against three pathology standard of truth (SoT) measures including neuritic plaques (CERAD "original" and "modified" and the amyloid component of the 2012 NIA-AA guidelines). METHODS: After [18F]flutemetamol imaging, 106 end-of-life patients who died underwent postmortem brain examination for amyloid plaque load. Blinded positron emission tomography scan interpretations by five independent electronically trained readers were compared with pathology measures. RESULTS: By SoT, sensitivity and specificity of majority image interpretations were, respectively, 91.9% and 87.5% with "original CERAD," 90.8% and 90.0% with "modified CERAD," and 85.7% and 100% with the 2012 NIA-AA criteria. DISCUSSION: The high accuracy of either CERAD criteria suggests that [18F]flutemetamol predominantly reflects neuritic amyloid plaque density. However, the use of CERAD criteria as the SoT can result in some false-positive results because of the presence of diffuse plaques, which are accounted for when the positron emission tomography read is compared with the 2012 NIA-AA criteria.

Brain uptake and safety of Flutemetamol F 18 injection in Japanese subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease, subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This Phase 2 study assessed the performance of positron emission tomography (PET) brain images made with Flutemetamol F 18 Injection in detecting ß-amyloid neuritic plaques in Japanese subjects. METHODS: Seventy subjects (25 with probable Alzheimer's disease (pAD), 20 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 25 cognitively normal healthy volunteers[HVs]) underwent PET brain imaging after intravenous Flutemetamol F 18 Injection (185 MBq). Images were interpreted as normal or abnormal for neuritic plaque density by each of five non-Japanese and five Japanese readers who were blinded to clinical data. The primary efficacy analysis (based on HV and pAD data) was the agreement of the non-Japanese readers' image interpretations with the clinical diagnosis, resulting in estimates of positive percent agreement (PPA; based on AD subjects; similar to sensitivity) and negative percent agreement (NPA; based on HVs; similar to specificity). Secondary analyses included PPA and NPA for the Japanese readers; inter-reader agreement (IRA); intra-reader reproducibility (IRR); quantitative image interpretations (standardized uptake value ratios [SUVRs]) by diagnostic subgroup; test-retest variability in five pAD subjects; and safety. RESULTS: PPA was 92% for all non-Japanese readers and ranged from 88 to 92% for the Japanese readers. NPA ranged from 96 to 100% for both the non-Japanese readers and the Japanese readers. The majority image interpretations (the interpretations made independently by ≥3 of 5 readers) resulted in PPA values of 92 and 92% and NPA values of 100 and 96% for the non-Japanese and Japanese readers, respectively. IRA and IRR were strong. Composite SUVR values (mean of multiple regional values) allowed clear differentiation between pAD subjects and HVs. Test-retest variability ranged from 1.14 to 2.27%, and test-retest agreement of the blinded visual interpretations was 100% for all readers. Flutemetamol F 18 Injection was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of brain neuritic plaques in Japanese subjects using [18F]Flutemetamol PET images gave results highly consistent with clinical diagnosis, with non-Japanese and Japanese readers giving similar results. Inter-reader agreement and intra-reader reproducibility were high for both sets of readers. Visual delineation of abnormal and normal scans was corroborated by quantitative assessment, with low test-retest variability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02813070.

Validation of an electronic image reader training programme for interpretation of [18F]flutemetamol ß-amyloid PET brain images.

OBJECTIVES: An electronic training programme (ETP) was developed for interpretation of images during routine clinical use of the PET amyloid imaging agent [F]flutemetamol injection (VIZAMYL). This study was carried out to validate the ETP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five nuclear medicine technologists (NMTs) and five readers previously inexperienced in amyloid image interpretation were required to self-train using the ETP and pass a test to participate. A total of 305 [F]flutemetamol PET images were then tested as the validation set, following preassessment and reorientation (where required) by one of five NMTs. Next, a new set of readers blinded to clinical information independently assessed all 305 images. Images had been acquired in previous studies from patients representing the full spectrum of cognitive capacity. When available, a standard of truth determined by histopathology or clinical history was used to derive sensitivity and specificity for image interpretation from this validation set. Randomly selected images (n=29) were read in duplicate to measure intrareader reproducibility. Images were read first without, and subsequently with anatomic images, if available. RESULTS: All NMTs and all readers scored 100% on the qualifying test. The interpretation of 135 cases without anatomic image support resulted in sensitivity ranging from 84% to 94% (majority 94%, median 92%) and specificity ranging from 77% to 96% (majority 92%, median 81%). Inter-reader agreement was very high, with most κ scores more than 0.8. Intrareader reproducibility ranged from 93 to 100%. CONCLUSION: The self-guided ETP effectively trained new amyloid PET image readers to accurately and reproducibly interpret [F]flutemetamol PET images.

Post-mortem histopathology underlying ß-amyloid PET imaging following flutemetamol F 18 injection.

In vivo imaging of fibrillar ß-amyloid deposits may assist clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), aid treatment selection for patients, assist clinical trials of therapeutic drugs through subject selection, and be used as an outcome measure. A recent phase III trial of [18F]flutemetamol positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in 106 end-of-life subjects demonstrated the ability to identify fibrillar ß-amyloid by comparing in vivo PET to post-mortem histopathology. Post-mortem analyses demonstrated a broad and continuous spectrum of ß-amyloid pathology in AD and other dementing and non-dementing disease groups. The GE067-026 trial demonstrated 91% sensitivity and 90% specificity of [18F]flutemetamol PET by majority read for the presence of moderate or frequent plaques. The probability of an abnormal [18F]flutemetamol scan increased with neocortical plaque density and AD diagnosis. All dementia cases with non-AD neurodegenerative diseases and those without histopathological features of ß-amyloid deposits were [18F]flutemetamol negative. Majority PET assessments accurately reflected the amyloid plaque burden in 90% of cases. However, ten cases demonstrated a mismatch between PET image interpretations and post-mortem findings. Although tracer retention was best associated with amyloid in neuritic plaques, amyloid in diffuse plaques and cerebral amyloid angiopathy best explain three [18F]flutemetamol positive cases with mismatched (sparse) neuritic plaque burden. Advanced cortical atrophy was associated with the seven false negative [18F]flutemetamol images. The interpretation of images from pathologically equivocal cases was associated with low reader confidence and inter-reader agreement. Our results support that amyloid in neuritic plaque burden is the primary form of ß-amyloid pathology detectable with [18F]flutemetamol PET imaging. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01165554. Registered June 21, 2010; NCT02090855. Registered March 11, 2014.

Phase 3 trial of flutemetamol labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 imaging and neuritic plaque density.

IMPORTANCE: In vivo imaging of brain ß-amyloid, a hallmark of Alzheimer disease, may assist in the clinical assessment of suspected Alzheimer disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography imaging with flutemetamol injection labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 to detect ß-amyloid in the brain using neuropathologically determined neuritic plaque levels as the standard of truth. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label multicenter imaging study that took place at dementia clinics, memory centers, and hospice centers in the United States and England from June 22, 2010, to November 23, 2011. Participants included terminally ill patients who were 55 years or older with a life expectancy of less than 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: Flutemetamol injection labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 (Vizamyl; GE Healthcare) administration followed by positron emission tomography imaging and subsequent brain donation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of flutemetamol injection labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 positron emission tomography imaging for brain ß-amyloid. Images were reviewed without and with computed tomography scans and classified as positive or negative for ß-amyloid by 5 readers who were blind to patient information. In patients who died, neuropathologically determined neuritic plaque levels were used to confirm scan interpretations and determine sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Of 176 patients with evaluable images, 68 patients (38%) died during the study, were autopsied, and had neuritic plaque levels determined; 25 brains (37%) were ß-amyloid negative; and 43 brains (63%) were ß-amyloid positive. Imaging was performed a mean of 3.5 months (range, 0 to 13 months) before death. Sensitivity without computed tomography was 81% to 93% (median, 88%). Median specificity was 88%, with 4 of 5 of the readers having specificity greater than 80%. When scans were interpreted with computed tomography images, sensitivity and specificity improved for most readers but the differences were not significant. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.90. There were no clinically meaningful findings in safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study showed that flutemetamol injection labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 was safe and had high sensitivity and specificity in an end-of-life population. In vivo detection of brain ß-amyloid plaque density may increase diagnostic accuracy in cognitively impaired patients.

Automated quantification of 18F-flutemetamol PET activity for categorizing scans as negative or positive for brain amyloid: concordance with visual image reads.

UNLABELLED: Clinical trials of the PET amyloid imaging agent (18)F-flutemetamol have used visual assessment to classify PET scans as negative or positive for brain amyloid. However, quantification provides additional information about regional and global tracer uptake and may have utility for image assessment over time and across different centers. Using postmortem brain neuritic plaque density data as a truth standard to derive a standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) threshold, we assessed a fully automated quantification method comparing visual and quantitative scan categorizations. We also compared the histopathology-derived SUVR threshold with one derived from healthy controls. METHODS: Data from 345 consenting subjects enrolled in 8 prior clinical trials of (18)F-flutemetamol injection were used. We grouped subjects into 3 cohorts: an autopsy cohort (n = 68) comprising terminally ill patients with postmortem confirmation of brain amyloid status; a test cohort (n = 172) comprising 33 patients with clinically probable Alzheimer disease, 80 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 59 healthy volunteers; and a healthy cohort of 105 volunteers, used to define a reference range for SUVR. Visual image categorizations for comparison were from a previous study. A fully automated PET-only quantification method was used to compute regional neocortical SUVRs that were combined into a single composite SUVR. An SUVR threshold for classifying scans as positive or negative was derived by ranking the PET scans from the autopsy cohort based on their composite SUVR and comparing data with the standard of truth based on postmortem brain amyloid status for subjects in the autopsy cohort. The derived threshold was used to categorize the 172 scans in the test cohort as negative or positive, and results were compared with categorization using visual assessment. Different reference and composite region definitions were assessed. Threshold levels were also compared with corresponding thresholds derived from the healthy group. RESULTS: Automated quantification (using pons as the reference region) demonstrated 91% sensitivity and 88% specificity and gave 3 false-positive and 4 false-negative scans. All 3 false-positive cases were either borderline-normal by standard of truth or had moderate to heavy cortical diffuse plaque burden. In the test cohort, the concordance between quantitative and visual read categorization ranged from 97.1% to 99.4% depending on the selection of reference and composite regions. The threshold derived from the healthy group was close to the histopathology-derived threshold. CONCLUSION: Categorization of (18)F-flutemetamol amyloid imaging data using an automated PET-only quantification method showed good agreement with histopathologic classification of neuritic plaque density and a strong concordance with visual read results.

Is ioflupane I123 injection diagnostically effective in patients with movement disorders and dementia? Pooled analysis of four clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: To pool clinical trials of similar design to assess overall sensitivity and specificity of ioflupane I123 injection (DaTSCAN or ioflupane ((123)I)) to detect or exclude a striatal dopaminergic deficit disorder (SDDD), such as parkinsonian syndrome and dementia with Lewy bodies. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of three phase 3 and one phase 4 clinical trials. These four trials were selected because they were the four studies used for the US new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). SETTING: Multicentre, open-label, non-randomised. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with either a movement disorder or dementia, and healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Ioflupane ((123)I) was administered. OUTCOME MEASURES: Images were assessed by panels of 3-5 blinded experts and/or on-site nuclear medicine physicians, classified as normal or abnormal and compared with clinical diagnosis (reference standard) to determine sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Pooling the four studies, 928 participants were enrolled, 849 were dosed and 764 completed their study. Across all studies, when images were assessed by on-site readers, ioflupane ((123)I) diagnostic effectiveness had an overall (95% CI) sensitivity of 91.9% (88.7% to 94.5%) and specificity of 83.6% (78.7% to 87.9%). When reads were conducted blindly by a panel of independent experts, the overall sensitivity was 88.7% (86.8% to 90.4%) and specificity was 91.2% (89.0% to 93.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis, the visual assessment of ioflupane ((123)I) images provided high levels of sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence/absence of an SDDD. Ioflupane ((123)I) imaging has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with signs and symptoms of a movement disorder and/or dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00209456.

Safety analysis of 10 clinical trials and for 13 years after first approval of ioflupane 123I injection (DaTscan).

Ioflupane is an analog of cocaine that binds reversibly with high affinity to the dopamine transporter (DaT) protein, a marker for presynaptic terminals in dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons. Ioflupane (123)I Injection is also known as DaTscan or DaTSCAN ((123)I-ioflupane is also called (123)I-2-ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)nortropane or (123)I-FP-CIT). The diagnostic efficacy of DaTscan has been described elsewhere. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the safety of DaTscan starting from initiation of clinical development through 13 y after the date of first market approval. Safety data in the sponsor's clinical development safety database from 10 completed DaTscan clinical trials were pooled, and postapproval experience was summarized from standardized aggregate safety reports submitted to regulatory agencies. A total of 1,180 clinical trial subjects (92% of 1,284 subjects planned to receive DaTscan in the clinical trials) received DaTscan. Percentages of subjects with adverse events by category were as follows: all (22%), considered at least possibly related to DaTscan by the investigator (4%), any severe (3%), headache (4%), nausea (2%), dizziness (2%), nasopharyngitis (1%), and injection site hematoma (1%). Four percent of subjects had at least 1 serious adverse event; 5 subjects (<1%) had serious adverse events that led to death. All serious adverse events, including those that led to death, were deemed by an expert clinician to be unrelated to DaTscan. An estimated half a million market doses of DaTscan (for single use) were administered from July 2000 through the July 2013 reporting period. In postapproval safety assessment, 1 death was reported 20 d after (and unrelated to) DaTscan administration. Two spontaneously reported serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and 32 spontaneously reported nonserious ADRs were submitted, approximately half of which are identified in labeling. Headache (in clinical trials) and injection site pain (postapproval) were the most commonly reported events or reactions. Although adverse events were reported for 1 in 5 clinical trial subjects, most were mild and considered unrelated to DaTscan administration. Severe events were uncommon, and no serious adverse event occurring in more than 1 subject was deemed related to DaTscan administration. In postapproval experience, the frequency of ADRs spontaneously reported was less than 1 per 10,000 doses administered. Comprehensive safety data show that DaTscan was well tolerated.

Diagnostic effectiveness of quantitative [¹8F]flutemetamol PET imaging for detection of fibrillar amyloid ß using cortical biopsy histopathology as the standard of truth in subjects with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

INTRODUCTION: PET imaging of amyloid-ß (Aß) in vivo holds promise for aiding in earlier diagnosis and intervention in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment. AD-like Aß pathology is a common comorbidity in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Fifty patients with iNPH needing ventriculo-peritoneal shunting or intracranial pressure monitoring underwent [18F]flutemetamol PET before (N = 28) or after (N = 22) surgery. Cortical uptake of [18F]flutemetamol was assessed visually by blinded reviewers, and also quantitatively via standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) in specific neocortical regions in relation to either cerebellum or pons reference region: the cerebral cortex of (prospective studies) or surrounding (retrospective studies) the biopsy site, the contralateral homolog, and a calculated composite brain measure. Aß pathology in the biopsy specimen (standard of truth [SoT]) was measured using Bielschowsky silver and thioflavin S plaque scores, percentage area of grey matter positive for monoclonal antibody to Aß (4G8), and overall pathology impression. We set out to find (1) which pair(s) of PET SUVR and pathology SoT endpoints matched best, (2) whether quantitative measures of [18F]flutemetamol PET were better for predicting the pathology outcome than blinded image examination (BIE), and (3) whether there was a better match between PET image findings in retrospective vs. prospective studies. RESULTS: Of the 24 possible endpoint/SoT combinations, the one with composite-cerebellum SUVR and SoT based on overall pathology had the highest Youden index (1.000), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (1.000), sensitivity (1.000), specificity (1.000), and sum of sensitivity and specificity for the pooled data as well as for the retrospective and prospective studies separately (2.00, for all 3). The BIE sum of sensitivity and specificity, comparable to that for quantitation, was highest using Bielschowsky silver as SoT for all SUVRs (ipsilateral, contralateral, and composite, for both reference regions). The composite SUVR had a 100% positive predictive value (both reference regions) for the overall pathology diagnosis. All SUVRs had a 100% negative predictive value for the Bielschowsky silver result. CONCLUSION: Bielschowsky silver stain and overall pathology judgment showed the strongest associations with imaging results.

Prospective flutemetamol positron emission tomography and histopathology in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

UNLABELLED: BACKGOUND/OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of association between uptake of the amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent [(18)F]flutemetamol and the level of amyloid-ß measured by immunohistochemical and histochemical staining in a frontal cortical region biopsy site. METHODS: Seventeen patients with probable normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) underwent prospective [(18)F]flutemetamol PET and subsequent frontal cortical brain biopsy during ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Tissue amyloid-ß was evaluated using the monoclonal antibody 4G8, thioflavin S and Bielschowsky silver stain. RESULTS: Four of the 17 patients (23.5%) had amyloid-ß pathology based on the overall pathology read and also showed increased [(18)F]flutemetamol uptake. [(18)F]Flutemetamol standardized uptake values from the biopsy site were significantly associated with biopsy specimen amyloid-ß levels (Pearson's r = 0.67; p = 0.006). There was also good correlation between the biopsy specimen amyloid-ß level and uptake of [(18)F]flutemetamol in the region contralateral to the biopsy site (r = 0.67; p = 0.006), as well as with composite cortical [(18)F]flutemetamol uptake (r = 0.65; p = 0.008). The blinded visual read showed a high level of agreement between all readers (κ = 0.88). Two of 3 readers were in full agreement on all images; 1 reader disagreed on 1 of the 17 NPH cases. Blinded visual assessments of PET images by 1 reader were associated with 100% sensitivity to the overall pathology read, and assessments by the 2 others were associated with 75% sensitivity (overall sensitivity by majority read was 75%); specificity of all readers was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]Flutemetamol detects brain amyloid-ß in vivo and shows promise as a valuable tool to study and possibly facilitate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease both in patients with suspected NPH and among the wider population.

Effect of Optison on pulmonary artery systolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance.

Ultrasound contrast agent safety has received recent attention based on reports of associated serious adverse events. The US Food and Drug Administration requested this postmarketing study of the effects of Optison on pulmonary hemodynamics. The aim of this study was to compare Optison and a placebo for effects on pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during right-sided cardiac catheterization. This was a single-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Optison in subjects referred for clinically indicated cardiac catheterization. Based on screening echocardiographic PASP, subjects were assigned to 1 of 2 strata (1 = normal PASP [≤35 mm Hg] and 2 = elevated PASP [>35 mm Hg]), in which they were randomized to treatment arm A (intravenous 0.5 ml Optison and then intravenous 0.5 ml placebo [5% dextrose] 15 minutes later) or arm B (intravenous 0.5 ml placebo [5% dextrose] and then 0.5 ml Optison 15 minutes later). Baseline pulmonary hemodynamics were obtained within 60 minutes before the first injection and 2, 6, and 10 minutes after each injection. Thirty patients each received their assigned treatments. There were no clinically relevant increases from baseline in mean PASP or PVR (Wood units) in either stratum alone or the combined strata. There were no serious adverse events. In conclusion, there is no change in PASP or PVR after intravenous injection of Optison at a clinically relevant dose in patients with normal or elevated baseline PASP.

An in vivo evaluation of cerebral cortical amyloid with [18F]flutemetamol using positron emission tomography compared with parietal biopsy samples in living normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

PURPOSE: The primary objectives of this study were to assess the safety of [(18)F]flutemetamol injection and determine the level of association between the quantitative estimates of brain uptake of [(18)F]flutemetamol and the quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) estimates of amyloid levels in cerebral cortex biopsies obtained during shunt placement in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). PROCEDURES: Parietal lobe biopsies were obtained from 12 subjects (mean (SD), 71 (8.1) years), during shunt placement for NPH. Shunt procedures and biopsies were performed within 8 weeks after the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, and followed by a computed tomography scan. The quantitative estimates of the brain uptake of [(18)F]flutemetamol (standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs)) from the biopsy site, contralateral to the biopsy site, and composite were made from the analysis of PET images. The quantitative IHC levels of amyloid load were estimated using a monoclonal antiamyloid ß antibody, 4 G8 (in percent area), as the standard of truth (N = 8, of which 5 had full histopathology staining). The primary analysis determined the level of association between the SUVR (with cerebellum as the reference region) from the biopsy site, and the level of amyloid was determined from IHC estimates of amyloid in the biopsy sample. RESULTS: [(18)F]Flutemetamol injection was found to be well tolerated. The biopsied area well represented the amyloid deposition throughout the cortex in this small sample. The biopsy site SUVR was significantly correlated with the biopsy specimen amyloid ß level (expressed as percent of biopsy specimen area staining with 4 G8). The full model was significant (p = 0.0174). In the secondary efficacy analyses, contralateral (to biopsy site) and composite SUVR values correlated significantly with the percent of biopsy specimen staining for amyloid ß based on 4 G8. Blinded visual [(18)F]flutemetamol image interpretations showed a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 100 % with pathology reads staining for amyloid plaque with Bielschowsky and thioflavin S and overall pathology read. The results of the blinded reader agreement for [(18)F]flutemetamol PET showed full agreement among three readers. CONCLUSIONS: PET imaging of NPH patients following the administration of [(18)F]flutemetamol injection was highly correlated with the presence of fibrillar amyloid ß in subsequent cortical biopsy samples in this small sample. Administration of [(18)F]flutemetamol injection was well tolerated.

Changes in clinical management and diagnosis following DaTscan SPECT imaging in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes: a 12-week follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: An accurate diagnosis is important for timely and adequate treatment in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndrome (CUPS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess safety and changes in clinical management, diagnosis and quality of life (QoL) at 4 and 12 weeks following DaTscan (ioflupane [(123)I] injection) imaging in patients with CUPS. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, single-dose, multicenter trial was carried out in patients with CUPS who were randomized to either a DaTscan imaging group or to a control group without imaging. The main outcome measures were the proportions of patients with changes in clinical management and diagnosis from baseline through to 12 weeks after DaTscan. A total of 19 university hospital centers in Europe and the USA participated in the study. There were 267 patients enrolled and randomized (131 DaTscan, 136 control). RESULTS: Significantly more DaTscan patients had changes in clinical management after 12 weeks (p = 0.004) compared to the control group, and significantly more DaTscan patients had changes in diagnosis at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks (both p < 0.001) compared to control patients. No significant difference in total score for QoL was observed between groups during the study duration. DaTscan was safe and well-tolerated. No deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or withdrawals due to AEs occurred during the study. One patient had a headache following treatment with a suspected relationship to DaTscan. CONCLUSION: DaTscan imaging significantly affected the clinical management and diagnosis of patients with CUPS. DaTscan is safe and well-tolerated and is a useful adjunct to differential diagnosis of CUPS.

[(18)F]Flutemetamol PET imaging and cortical biopsy histopathology for fibrillar amyloid ß detection in living subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus: pooled analysis of four studies.

Molecular imaging techniques developed to 'visualize' amyloid in vivo represent a major achievement in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. This pooled analysis of four studies determined the level of association between uptake of the fibrillar amyloid ß positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent [(18)F]flutemetamol (Pittsburgh Compound B analog with a 5.5 times longer half-life to enable it to be used in the clinical setting) and neuritic plaques and fibrillar amyloid ß measured by pathologic staining of cortical region biopsy samples. Fifty-two patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent prospective (n = 30) or retrospective (n = 22) [(18)F]flutemetamol PET imaging for detection of cerebral cortical fibrillar amyloid ß and cortical brain biopsy during intracranial pressure measurement or ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. [(18)F]Flutemetamol uptake was quantified using standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) with cerebellar cortex as the reference region. Tissue fibrillar amyloid ß was evaluated using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibody 4G8 and histochemical agents Thioflavin S and Bielschowsky silver stain, and an overall pathology result based on all available immunohistochemical and histochemical results. Biopsy site and contralateral [(18)F]flutemetamol SUVRs were significantly associated with neuritic plaque burden assessed with Bielschowsky silver stain (r (spearman's) = 0.61, p = 0.0001 for both), as was the composite SUVR with biopsy pathology (r (spearman's) = 0.74, p < 0.0001). SUVR and immunohistochemical results with 4G8 for detecting fibrillar amyloid ß were similar. Blinded image evaluation showed strong agreement between readers (κ = 0.86). Overall sensitivity and specificity by majority read were 93 and 100 %. Noninvasive in vivo [(18)F]flutemetamol PET imaging demonstrates strong concordance with histopathology for brain fibrillar amyloid ß, supporting its promise as a tool to assist physicians with earlier detection of the disease process and making diagnostic decisions about concomitant AD and other diseases associated with brain amyloidosis.

Impact of DaTscan SPECT imaging on clinical management, diagnosis, confidence of diagnosis, quality of life, health resource use and safety in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes: a prospective 1-year follow-up of an open-label controlled study.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of DaTscan on clinical management, diagnosis, confidence of diagnosis (CoD), quality of life (QoL), health resource use (HRU) and safety during a 1-year follow-up in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes (CUPS). METHODS: A total of 19 university hospital centres in Europe and the USA participated in this open-label, single-dose, prospective, clinical trial in patients with CUPS who were randomised to a DaTscan imaging group or to a no-imaging (control) group. The proportion of patients with changes in clinical management, diagnosis, CoD, QoL and HRU from baseline through 1 year post-DaTscan was compared between groups. RESULTS: There were 273 patients randomised (135 DaTscan, 138 control). Significantly more patients in the DaTscan imaging group had at least one change in their actual clinical management after 12 weeks (p=0.002) and after 1 year (p<0.001) compared with patients in the control group. In addition, significantly more DaTscan patients had changes in diagnosis and an increased CoD at 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year (all p<0.001) compared with control patients. No significant differences in total score for QoL or HRU were observed between groups during the 1-year follow-up period. DaTscan was safe and well tolerated. One patient in the imaging group had an adverse event (headache) with suspected relationship to DaTscan post-administration. CONCLUSIONS: DaTscan had a significant impact on clinical management, diagnosis and CoD in patients with CUPS. DaTscan is safe and well tolerated, and is a useful adjunct to differentiate a diagnosis of CUPS. Trial registration number http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382967.

Association between in vivo fluorine 18-labeled flutemetamol amyloid positron emission tomography imaging and in vivo cerebral cortical histopathology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correspondence of in vivo quantitative estimates of brain uptake of fluorine 18-labeled flutemetamol with immunohistochemical estimates of amyloid levels in patients who underwent previous biopsy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of ¹8F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography (PET) findings in patients with prior cortical biopsy specimen stained for the presence or absence of amyloid plaques. SETTING: University hospital. Patients Seven patients who previously had a prior right frontal cortical biopsy at the site of ventriculoperitoneal placement for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus were recruited. Inclusion criteria included an adequate biopsy specimen for detection and quantification of ß-amyloid pathology and age older than 50 years. Intervention All patients underwent an ¹8F-flutemetamol PET scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measures of ¹8F-flutemetamol uptake (standardized uptake value ratio, a ratio of mean target cortex activity divided by that in a cerebellar reference region) were made at a location contralateral to the biopsy site and compared with estimates of amyloid load based on immunohistochemical and histological staining. RESULTS: There was complete agreement between visual reads of ¹8F-flutemetamol PET scans (3 blinded readers with majority rule) and histology. A regression model, including time from biopsy as a covariate, demonstrated a significant relationship (P = .01) between ¹8F-flutemetamol uptake and percentage of area of amyloid measured by a monoclonal antibody raised against amyloid (NAB228). Similar results were found with the amyloid-specific monoclonal antibody 4G8 and Thioflavin S. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, these data are the first to demonstrate the concordance of ¹8F-flutemetamol PET imaging with histopathology, supporting its sensitivity to detect amyloid and potential use in the study and detection of Alzheimer disease.

Nephrotoxicity of iodixanol versus ioversol in patients with chronic kidney disease: the Visipaque Angiography/Interventions with Laboratory Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (VALOR) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol has been reported to be less nephrotoxic than selected low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with diabetes mellitus. This study compared the nephrotoxicity of iodixanol and the LOCM ioversol in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: This is a prospective double-blind trial in 337 patients with stable CKD who were randomly assigned to receive the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol or the LOCM ioversol. The co-primary end points were the mean peak percentage change (MPPC) in baseline serum creatinine and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (rise of > 0.5 mg/dL in baseline serum creatinine within 72 hours postcontrast) for the 2 contrast media in the 72-hour period after contrast administration. Prespecified analyses included stratification on diabetic state and the use of N-acetylcysteine. RESULTS: In the 299 patients with complete post-contrast media creatinine data, the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 21.8% in the iodixanol subjects and 23.8% in the ioversol subjects (P = .78). For all patients, the MPPC was 14.7% with iodixanol and 20.0% with ioversol (P = .06), whereas in the subset of diabetic patients, this value was significantly lower in the iodixanol (12.9%) compared with the ioversol subjects (22.4%, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the nephrotoxicity associated with iodixanol was not significantly different from that observed with ioversol in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography, although in diabetic patients, MPPC was significantly lower in the iodixanol group.