Sinomenine facilitates the efficacy of gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride in animal models of neuropathic pain.

Management of chronic pain is restricted by the lack of effective tools. This study evaluated the efficacies of sinomenine combined gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride in treating peripheral and central chronic neuropathic pain. The study was conducted in mice with photochemically induced sciatic nerve injury, and in rats with photochemically induced spinal cord injury. For assessing the effectiveness of combined therapy, sinomenine, gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.), and pain behavioral tests were performed. At sub-effective dosages, pre-administration of sinomenine (for 60 min) plus gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride, generated significant anti-allodynic effects in mice or rats with peripheral or central neuropathic pain. However, these effects were abolished when gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride was pre-administered, and then sinomenine was given 60 min later. The combined efficacies of sinomenine and gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride, cannot be blocked or reversed by the naloxone, suggesting the underlying mechanism is not mediated by opioid receptors. Moreover, following repeated treatments, sinomenine and gabapentin combination increased the baseline mechanical threshold, while generating prolonged analgesia, without introducing notable side effects. Sinomenine can enhance the efficacy of gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride in rodent models of peripheral or central neuropathic pain, without introducing tolerance or other notable side effects. Findings of current study suggest that combing sinomenine and gabapentin or ligustrazine hydrochloride could be highly beneficial in neuropathic pain therapies.

Gabapentin and NMDA receptor antagonists interacts synergistically to alleviate allodynia in two rat models of neuropathic pain.

Background and aims The clinical management of neuropathic pain remains a challenge. We examined the interaction between gabapentin and NMDA receptor antagonists dextromethrophan and MK-801 in alleviating neuropathic pain-like behaviors in rats after spinal cord or sciatic nerve injury. Methods Female and male rats were produced with Ischemic spinal cord injury and sciatic nerve injury. Gabapentin, dextromethorphan, MK-801 or drug combinations were injected with increasing doses. Mechanical response thresholds were tested with von Frey hairs to graded mechanical touch/pressure, and ethyl chloride spray was applied to assess the cold sensitivity before and after injuries. Results In spinally injured rats, gabapentin and dextromethorphan did not affect allodynia-like behaviors at doses of 30 and 20 mg/kg, respectively. In contrast, combination of 15 or 30 mg/kg gabapentin with dextromethorphan at 10 mg/kg produced total alleviation of allodynia to mechanical or cold stimulation. Further reducing the dose of gapapentin to 7.5 mg/kg and dextromethorphan to 5 mg/kg still produced significant effect. MK-801, another NMDA receptor antagonist, also enhanced the effect of gabapentin in spinally injured rats. Similar synergistic anti-allodynic effect between dextromethorphan and gabapentin was also observed in a rat model of partial sciatic nerve injury. No increased side effect was seen following the combination between gabapentin and dextromethorphan. Conclusions In conclusion, the present study suggested that combining NMDA receptor antagonists with gabapentin could provide synergistic effect to alleviate neuropathic pain and reduced side effects. Implications Combining NMDA receptor antagonists with gabapentin may provide a new approach in alleviating neuropathic pain with increased efficacy and reduced side effects.

Sinomenine alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity in mice with experimentally induced rheumatoid arthritis.

Background and aims We have previously reported that sinomenine, an alkaloid isolated from the root of the plant Sinomenium acutum, had antinociceptive effect in rodent models of acute inflammatory or neuropathic pain. As a traditional medicine, sinomenine is used in China to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In the present study, we evaluated the potential antinociceptive effect of sinomenine in a mouse model of RA, collagen type II antibody (CII Ab) induced arthritis (CAIA) after acute and chronic administration. Results As single administration, sinomenine at 40 or 80 mg/kg significantly reduced mechanical hypersensitivity both at the time of peak joint inflammation (days 11-19 after CII Ab injection) or during the post-inflammatory phase (days 35-54). No tolerance to the effect of 80 mg/kg sinomenine was observed during repeated injection twice a day for 5 days from day 11 to day 19 or from day 49 to day 53 after CII Ab injection in CAIA mice. Conclusions We have shown that sinomenine is effective in alleviating localized and spread hypersensitivities in CAIA mice both during acute inflammation and in post-inflammatory phase. Further, repeated sinomenine administration has elevated the baseline mechanical threshold without producing tolerance. Implications Sinomenine may be clinically useful to treat chronic pain in RA, including wide-spread pain which appears to be a difficult clinical problem despite the improvement in the acute treatment of RA by disease modifying agents.

Octamer-binding protein 4 affects the cell biology and phenotypic transition of lung cancer cells involving ß-catenin/E-cadherin complex degradation.

Clinical studies have reported evidence for the involvement of octamer­binding protein 4 (Oct4) in the tumorigenicity and progression of lung cancer; however, the role of Oct4 in lung cancer cell biology in vitro and its mechanism of action remain to be elucidated. Mortality among lung cancer patients is more frequently due to metastasis rather than their primary tumors. Epithelial­mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a prominent biological event for the induction of epithelial cancer metastasis. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether Oct4 had the capacity to induce lung cancer cell metastasis via the promoting the EMT in vitro. Moreover, the effect of Oct4 on the ß­catenin/E­cadherin complex, associated with EMT, was examined using immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation assays as well as western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that Oct4 enhanced cell invasion and adhesion accompanied by the downregulation of epithelial marker cytokeratin, and upregulation of the mesenchymal markers vimentin and N­cadherin. Furthermore, Oct4 induced EMT of lung cancer cells by promoting ß­catenin/E­cadherin complex degradation and regulating nuclear localization of ß­catenin. In conclusion, the present study indicated that Oct4 affected the cell biology of lung cancer cells in vitro through promoting lung cancer cell metastasis via EMT; in addition, the results suggested that the association and degradation of the ß­catenin/E­cadherin complex was regulated by Oct4 during the process of EMT.

MicroRNA-145 inhibits lung cancer cell metastasis.

Previous studies have identified a variety of microRNAs (miRNAs) that have important roles in cancer progression, particularly in tumor invasion and metastasis. Downregulation of miR­145 was reported to occur in various types of human cancer; however, the role of miR­145 in lung cancer metastasis and its potential mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of miR­145 on metastasis and epithelial­mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. In addition, the underlying mechanisms by which miR­145 regulates EMT were examined. The miR­145 mimic was transfected into A549 cells; cell invasion and adhesion assays were then performed in order to investigate cell metastasis, and western blot analysis was used to examine the expression of EMT markers. In order to further examine the underlying mechanisms by which miR­145 regulates EMT, a luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine whether miR­145 targeted Oct4. In addition, the expression of Wnt3a and ß­catenin in A549 cells was measured following transfection with small hairpin RNA­Oct4. To the best of our knowledge, the results of the present study demonstrated for the first time, that miR­145 inhibited lung cancer cell metastasis and EMT via targeting the Oct4 mediated Wnt/ß­catenin signaling pathway.

Repeated sinomenine administration alleviates chronic neuropathic pain-like behaviours in rodents without producing tolerance.

Background and aims We have previously reported that systemic administration of sinomenine produced antinociception in various experimental pain conditions in rodents, particularly in models of neuropathic pain. In the present study we assessed the effects of repeated administration of sinomenine in two rodent models of neuropathic pain in order to study the development of tolerance. Methods The analgesic effect of sinomenine was tested in female Sprague-Dawley rats that exhibited mechanical and cold hypersensitivity following ischaemic injury to the spinal cord and in male C57/BL6 mice that developed mechanical hypersensitivity after ischaemic injury to the sciatic nerve. Briefly, the animals were anaesthetized and injected i.v. with the photosensitizing dye erythrosine B. Vertebral segments T12 to T13 in rats or the sciatic nerve in mice were exposed and irradiated under an argon ion laser for 10min or 45s, respectively. In rats, mechanical hypersensitivity to pressure with von Frey hairs, the response to brushing and decreasing cold temperature were tested in the flanks or upper back areas. In mice, mechanical hypersensitivity on the hind paw to von Frey hairs and response to cold following a drop of acetone were measured. Sinomenine was administered i.p. in rats and p.o. in mice at 10:00 and 16:00, twice a day for 5 days. Response threshold before and 2h after drug administration at 10.00h was recorded. Results Repeated administration of sinomenine at 10 or 20mg/kg twice a day, doses that have no analgesic effect as single injection, alleviated mechanical, but not cold allodynia in spinally injured rats and the effect was maintained during the 5 day treatment period with no signs of tolerance. Furthermore, the pre-drug response threshold was significantly elevated during repeated treatment with 20mg/kg sinomenine. Sinomenine administered at 40mg/kg twice a day for 5 days significantly reduced mechanical and cold alldoynia, elevated pre-drug response threshold without tolerance development in spinally injured rats. Similarly, sinomenine at 80mg/kg twice a day for 5 days significantly reduced mechanical allodynia in mice with sciatic nerve injury and increased pre-drug response threshold with no sign of tolerance. The effect of sinomenine on response threshold persisted for days after termination of the 5 day drug administration. Conclusions The results suggest that repeated administration of simomenine produced an enhanced anti-allodynic effect without tolerance in rodent models of neuropathic pain. Implications Sinomenine may be tested as a novel analgesic in treating some forms of chronic neuropathic pain in patients.