Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An operating room, a postoperative recovery area, and a hospital ward. PATIENTS: A total of 102 female patients scheduled for elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the propofol group (group P) or sevoflurane group (group S). INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia in group P was induced by propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and maintained by intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesia in group S was induced by a tidal volume inhalation technique with sevoflurane and rocuronium and maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. Patients in group P did not receive any volatile drugs. MEASUREMENTS: Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were assessed at 8, 24, 48, 72 h, 7 days and 30 days after surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative inflammatory indicators and adverse reactions were also recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The QoR-40 score and its 5 dimensions were similar in the two groups at each point in time (P > 0.05). Group S had less consumption of remifentanil (P < 0.001) but increased use of phenylephrine (P = 0.001) intraoperatively. PSQI scores were also comparable between groups at each point in time (P > 0.05). NRS scores at 72 h (P = 0.023) and 7 days (P = 0.017) after surgery, postoperative NLR (P = 0.024) and hs-CRP (P = 0.042), and the incidence of abdominal distension (P = 0.017) were significantly lower in group P than in group S. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that duration of pneumoperitoneum and sleep quality were associated with postoperative recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of intravenous or inhalation maintenance anesthesia did not affect overall postoperative recovery as measured by the QoR-40 in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Reducing the duration of pneumoperitoneum and improving sleep quality were conducive to postoperative recovery.

Effect of Different Positions During Surgical Preparation With Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The intraoperative 15° left-tilt position during cesarean delivery has more recently been questioned regarding its effect on fetal acid-base balance and is a frequent source of complaints by surgeons. We hypothesized that a 30° left-tilt position during surgical preparation could improve the acid-base balance of the fetus compared with the 15° left-tilt or supine position during surgical preparation. METHODS: Women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomized to a supine position, 15° left-lateral tilt position or 30° left-lateral tilt position; the position was changed to supine before the incision. Anesthetic management was standardized and included fluid loading with 10 mL/kg of normal saline followed by colloid loading. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] reduction >20% baseline value or SBP <90 mm Hg) was treated with boluses of phenylephrine or ephedrine according to maternal heart rate. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial blood pH and the secondary outcomes included maternal SBP within 15 minutes after induction of anesthesia, the amount of vasoactive drug administered before end of the surgery, and the incidence of hypotension during cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included. After testing by analysis of variance, there was no significant difference in the umbilical arterial pH among the 3 groups (supine group: 7.31 ± 0.03 vs 15° group: 7.30 ± 0.04 vs 30° group: 7.31 ± 0.02, P = .28). The 30° group required significantly less phenylephrine (P = .007) and ephedrine (P = .005) before the end of surgery than the supine group; however, the only benefit observed in the 15° group was that the mean SBP at 3 minutes after spinal injection was significantly improved compared with the supine group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the supine position, the 30° left-tilt position during surgical preparation did not significantly improve the fetal acid-base status, but it significantly reduced the use of phenylephrine and ephedrine and reduced the incidence of hypotension; however, these benefits were not observed in the 15° left-tilt group.