Should it really be called a heroic cerclage? The obstetrical results of emergency late second-trimester cerclage compared with early history-indicated elective cerclage: a retrospective trial.

PURPOSE: Women diagnosed with mid-trimester cervical insufficiency and dilatation are offered interventions to salvage and support the cervix, where the mainstay of therapy is emergency cervical cerclage. However, considering the significant morbidity associated with delivery in the extreme prematurity period, some women may opt for pregnancy termination. In addition, it is expected that elective cerclage in a subsequent pregnancy may yield better obstetrical results. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the obstetrical outcomes of emergency cerclage versus elective cerclage. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the pregnancy outcomes of women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage at our institution between December 2008 and November 2021. Women who underwent emergency cervical cerclage due to painless dilatation in the second trimester were compared with women who underwent elective cerclage. RESULTS: Overall, 32 women who underwent emergency cerclage and 183 women who underwent elective cerclage were included. No cases of iatrogenic membrane rupture were noted during the cerclage procedure. There was no statistical difference between the emergency cerclage group and the elective cerclage group in the primary outcomes: gestational age at delivery (35.8 + 4.7 vs 36.3 + 4.9, p = 0.58, respectively), delivery in the extreme prematurity period (between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, 6.5% vs 2.3%, p = 0.21, respectively), and fetal or neonatal death (6.9% vs 6.3%, p = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although there are much less favourable circumstances, emergency cerclage is a safe procedure with comparable obstetrical outcomes to elective cerclage. Patient selection and experienced medical team may play a significant role in those cases.

Spontaneous Hemoperitoneum in Pregnancy and Endometriosis: A New Challenge in a Known Disease.

Importance: Spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) is a rare life-threatening event previously associated with endometriosis. Although pregnancy is thought to improve the symptoms of endometriosis, abrupt intraperitoneal bleeding can occur, jeopardizing both maternal and fetal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to review the published information regarding SHiP pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and management in a flowchart approach. Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of published articles in the English-language was carried out. Results: SHiP most commonly presents in the second half of pregnancy with a combination of abdominal pain, hypovolemia, a decline in hemoglobin level, and fetal distress. Nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms are not uncommon. Surgical management is suitable in most scenarios and avoids complications such as recurrent bleeding and infected hematoma. Maternal outcome has improved greatly, whereas perinatal mortality remained unchanged. In addition to physical strain, SHiP was reported to have a psychosocial sequela. Conclusions and Relevance: A high index of suspicion is required when patients present with acute abdominal pain and signs of hypovolemia. Early use of sonography contributes to narrowing down the diagnosis. Health care providers should be familiar with the SHiP diagnosis because early identification is crucial when attempting to safeguard maternal and fetal outcomes. Maternal and fetal requirements are often contradictory, creating a greater challenge in decision-making and treatment. A multidisciplinary team approach should coordinate the treatment, whenever a SHiP diagnosis is suspected.

Caesarean scar pregnancy: is there a light in the end of the tunnel?

PURPOSE: To summarize and present a single tertiary center's 25 years of experience managing patients with caesarean scar pregnancies and their long-term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. METHODS: A 25-year retrospective study included women diagnosed with CSP from 1996 to 2020 in one tertiary center. Data were retrieved from the medical records and through a telephone interview. Diagnosis was made by sonography and color Doppler. Treatments included methotrexate, suction curettage, hysteroscopy, embolization and wedge resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as a function of the clinical manifestations, the physicians' decisions, patient counseling, and parental requests. RESULTS: Analysis of the records recovered 60 cases of CSP (two of whom were recurrent). All patients had complete resolution with no indication for hysterectomy. Thirty-five patients had a long-term follow-up, of whom 24 (68.6%) attempted to conceive again and 22 (91.6%) succeeded. There were 17/22 (77.3%) patients with at least one live birth, 3/22 (13.6%) spontaneous miscarriages and 2/22 (9%) recurrent CSP. The obstetric complications included abnormal placentation 5/19 (26.3%), premature rupture of membranes 2/19 (10.5%), preterm delivery 4/19 (21%) and abnormality of the uterine scar 2/19 (10.5%). There was one case of neonatal death due to complications of prematurity 1/19 (5.2%). CONCLUSION: CSP treatment focusing on reducing morbidity and preserving fertility has encouraging long-term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. In subsequent pregnancies, we recommend performing an early first trimester vaginal scan to map the location of the new pregnancy, followed by close monitoring given the obstetric complications mentioned above.

Advanced Cystocele is a Risk Factor for Surgical Failure after Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALSCP) and to identify risk factors for surgical failure and long-term complications in patients at high risk for surgical failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-seven women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at high risk for surgical failure. INTERVENTIONS: RALSCP from November 2012 to July 2020. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Information was collected from the electronic medical records. Preoperative and postoperative assessment included urogynecologic history, prolapse staging, cough stress test, and validated quality of life questionnaires. Anatomic success was defined as POP stage < 2 at the last follow-up. Mean follow-up was 24.6 ± 17.9 months. Sixteen women (23.9%) reported bulge symptoms at the latest follow-up; upon POP Quantification staging, surgical failure or recurrence was observed in 35 patients (52.2%). On multiple logistic regression analysis, a preoperative POP Quantification point Ba measurement ≥3 cm beyond the hymen was independently related to surgical failure. Late postoperative complications included 3 cases (4.5%) of postoperative ventral hernia and 5 cases (7.5%) of mesh erosion, all in patients operated using Ethibond sutures. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic success of RALSCP in POP patients at high risk for surgical failure is worse than previously reported. Advanced preoperative anterior vaginal wall prolapse is a risk factor for surgical failure. Delayed absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh fixation seem to be safer than multifilament, permanent sutures, in terms of the risk of mesh erosion.