Prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals in Latin America: a multicenter observational study. / Prevalência e desfechos da sepse em crianças internadas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina: um estudo observacional multicêntrico.

OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES) data, a cohort study that analyzed the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill children with sepsis on admission at 21 pediatric intensive care units in five Latin American countries. RESULTS: Of the 464 sepsis patients, 369 (79.5%) were admitted to public hospitals and 95 (20.5%) to private hospitals. Compared to those admitted to private hospitals, sepsis patients admitted to public hospitals did not differ in age, sex, immunization status, hospital length of stay or type of admission but had higher rates of septic shock, higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores, and higher rates of underlying diseases and maternal illiteracy. The proportion of patients admitted from pediatric wards and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals. Multivariate analysis did not show any correlation between mortality and the type of hospital, but mortality was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission in patients from public hospitals. CONCLUSION: In this sample of critically ill children from five countries in Latin America, the prevalence of septic shock within the first 24 hours at admission and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals. Higher sepsis-related mortality in children admitted to public pediatric intensive care units was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission but not with the type of hospital. New studies will be necessary to elucidate the causes of the higher prevalence and mortality of pediatric sepsis in public hospitals.

OBJETIVO: Relatar a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina. MÉTODOS: Análise post-hoc dos dados do Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES), um estudo de coorte que avaliou a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em 21 unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas de cinco países latino-americanos. RESULTADOS: Dentre os 464 pacientes com sepse, 369 (79,5%) foram admitidos em hospitais públicos e 95 (20,5%) em privados. Em comparação com os admitidos em hospitais privados, os pacientes com sepse admitidos em hospitais públicos não diferiram em termos de idade, sexo, condição de imunização, tempo de permanência no hospital ou tipo de admissão, porém tiveram incidência mais alta de choque séptico, escores Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) e Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) mais altos e taxas mais elevadas de doenças de base e analfabetismo materno. A proporção entre pacientes admitidos a partir de enfermarias pediátricas e mortalidade relacionada à sepse foi mais alta nos hospitais públicos. A análise multivariada não mostrou qualquer correlação entre mortalidade e tipo de hospital, porém, nos hospitais públicos, a mortalidade se associou com níveis mais altos de gravidade no momento da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva. CONCLUSÃO: Nesta amostra de crianças admitidas em condições críticas em cinco países latino-americanos, a prevalência de choque séptico nas primeiras 24 horas da admissão e a mortalidade relacionada à sepse foram mais elevadas em hospitais públicos do que nos privados. A mortalidade relacionada à sepse mais elevada em crianças admitidas em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica de hospitais públicos se associou com maior gravidade por ocasião da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva, porém não com o tipo de hospital. São necessários novos estudos para elucidar as causas da maior prevalência e mortalidade de sepse pediátrica em hospitais públicos.

Prevalência e desfechos da sepse em crianças internadas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina: um estudo observacional multicêntrico / Prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals in Latin America: a multicenter observational study

RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina. Métodos: Análise post-hoc dos dados do Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES), um estudo de coorte que avaliou a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em 21 unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas de cinco países latino-americanos. Resultados: Dentre os 464 pacientes com sepse, 369 (79,5%) foram admitidos em hospitais públicos e 95 (20,5%) em privados. Em comparação com os admitidos em hospitais privados, os pacientes com sepse admitidos em hospitais públicos não diferiram em termos de idade, sexo, condição de imunização, tempo de permanência no hospital ou tipo de admissão, porém tiveram incidência mais alta de choque séptico, escores Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) e Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) mais altos e taxas mais elevadas de doenças de base e analfabetismo materno. A proporção entre pacientes admitidos a partir de enfermarias pediátricas e mortalidade relacionada à sepse foi mais alta nos hospitais públicos. A análise multivariada não mostrou qualquer correlação entre mortalidade e tipo de hospital, porém, nos hospitais públicos, a mortalidade se associou com níveis mais altos de gravidade no momento da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão: Nesta amostra de crianças admitidas em condições críticas em cinco países latino-americanos, a prevalência de choque séptico nas primeiras 24 horas da admissão e a mortalidade relacionada à sepse foram mais elevadas em hospitais públicos do que nos privados. A mortalidade relacionada à sepse mais elevada em crianças admitidas em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica de hospitais públicos se associou com maior gravidade por ocasião da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva, porém não com o tipo de hospital. São necessários novos estudos para elucidar as causas da maior prevalência e mortalidade de sepse pediátrica em hospitais públicos.

ABSTRACT Objective: To report the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES) data, a cohort study that analyzed the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill children with sepsis on admission at 21 pediatric intensive care units in five Latin American countries. Results: Of the 464 sepsis patients, 369 (79.5%) were admitted to public hospitals and 95 (20.5%) to private hospitals. Compared to those admitted to private hospitals, sepsis patients admitted to public hospitals did not differ in age, sex, immunization status, hospital length of stay or type of admission but had higher rates of septic shock, higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores, and higher rates of underlying diseases and maternal illiteracy. The proportion of patients admitted from pediatric wards and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals. Multivariate analysis did not show any correlation between mortality and the type of hospital, but mortality was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission in patients from public hospitals. Conclusion: In this sample of critically ill children from five countries in Latin America, the prevalence of septic shock within the first 24 hours at admission and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals. Higher sepsis-related mortality in children admitted to public pediatric intensive care units was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission but not with the type of hospital. New studies will be necessary to elucidate the causes of the higher prevalence and mortality of pediatric sepsis in public hospitals.

Epidemiology of Sepsis in Children Admitted to PICUs in South America.

OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of sepsis within the first 24 hours at admission and the PICU sepsis-related mortality among critically ill children admitted to PICU in South America. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-one PICU, located in five South America countries. PATIENTS: All children from 29 days to 17 years old admitted to the participating PICU between June 2011 and September 2011. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory data were registered within the first 24 hours at admission. Outcomes were registered upon PICU discharge or death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1,090 patients included in this study, 464 had sepsis. The prevalence of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were 42.6%, 25.9%, and 19.8%, respectively. The median age of sepsis patients was 11.6 months (interquartile range, 3.2-48.7) and 43% had one or more prior chronic condition. The prevalence of sepsis was higher in infants (50.4%) and lower in adolescents (1.9%). Sepsis-related mortality was 14.2% and was consistently higher with increased disease severity: 4.4% for sepsis, 12.3% for severe sepsis, and 23.1% for septic shock. Twenty-five percent of deaths occurred within the first 24 hours at PICU admission. Multivariate analysis showed that higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores, the presence of two or more chronic conditions, and admission from pediatric wards were independently associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: We observed high prevalence of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality among this sample of children admitted to PICU in South America. Mortality was associated with greater severity of illness at admission and potentially associated with late PICU referral.

Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock.

OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to compare the effects of dopamine or epinephrine in severe sepsis on 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were the rate of healthcare-associated infection, the need for other vasoactive drugs, and the multiple organ dysfunction score. DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial from February 1, 2009, to July 31, 2013. SETTING: PICU, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS: Consecutive children who are 1 month to 15 years old and met the clinical criteria for fluid-refractory septic shock. Exclusions were receiving vasoactive drug(s) prior to hospital admission, having known cardiac disease, having already participated in the trial during the same hospital stay, refusing to participate, or having do-not-resuscitate orders. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either dopamine (5-10 µg/kg/min) or epinephrine (0.1-0.3 µg/kg/min) through a peripheral or intraosseous line. Patients not reaching predefined stabilization criteria after the maximum dose were classified as treatment failure, at which point the attending physician gradually stopped the study drug and started another catecholamine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic and laboratory data were recorded. Baseline characteristics were described as proportions and mean (± SD) and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05. Baseline characteristics and therapeutic interventions for the 120 children enrolled (63, dopamine; 57, epinephrine) were similar. There were 17 deaths (14.2%): 13 (20.6%) in the dopamine group and four (7%) in the epinephrine group (p=0.033). Dopamine was associated with death (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.1-37.8; p=0.037) and healthcare-associated infection (odds ratio, 67.7; 95% CI, 5.0-910.8; p=0.001). The use of epinephrine was associated with a survival odds ratio of 6.49. CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death and healthcare-associated infection. Early administration of peripheral or intraosseous epinephrine was associated with increased survival in this population. Limitations should be observed while interpreting these results.

High Frequency of Staphylococcus Saprophyticus Urinary Tract Infections Among Female Adolescents.

Staphylococcus saprophyticus is a rarely reported agent of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the pediatric population. In our retrospective 3-year study, S. saprophyticus comprised 24.5% of 106 isolates of UTIs in female adolescents 12-15 years of age who attended an emergency department. Clinicians should be aware of the high prevalence of this etiology when empirically treating UTIs in female adolescents.

Community-acquired urinary tract infection: age and gender-dependent etiology.

INTRODUCTION: Choosing the antimicrobial agent for initial therapy of urinary tract infection (UTI) is usually empirical and should consider the prevalence of uropathogens in different age groups and gender. OBJECTIVE: To establish prevalence rates of uropathogens in community-acquired UTI in relation to age and gender. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a general hospital, from January to December, 2010, in patients younger than 15 years old who had clinical suspicion of UTI and collected quantitative urine culture. UTI was defined as urine culture with growth of a single agent > 100.000 colony forming units (cfu)/mL in a midstream collection or ≥ 50.000 cfu/mL in urethral catheterization. RESULTS: There were 63.464 visits to ED. 2577 urine cultures were obtained, of whom 291 were positive for UTI (prevalence = 11.3% of clinical suspicion and 0.46% of visits), 212 cases (72.8%) in females, median age = 2.6 years. The predominant uropathogen was E. coli (76.6%), followed by Proteus mirabilis (10.3%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.1%). Among infants < 3 months, prevalence rates of E. coli were significantly lower (50% vs 78.4%; OR = 0.276; p = 0.006). Higher prevalences of Staphylococcus saprophyticus occurred among patients > 10 years (24.4% vs 0.4%; OR = 79.265; p < 0.0001). Proteus mirabilis was significantly more prevalent in boys than girls (24.0% vs 5.2%; OR = 5.786; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli was the most prevalent community-acquired uropathogen. Nevertheless, initial empiric antimicrobial treatment of UTI should consider the significant prevalence of other agents different from E. coli in infants < 3 months, the high prevalence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus in patients > 10 years and Proteus mirabilis in males.

Infecção urinária comunitária: etiologia segundo idade e sexo / Community-acquired urinary tract infection: age and gender-dependent etiology

INTRODUÇÃO: A escolha do antimicrobiano para tratamento inicial de infecção de trato urinário (ITU) costuma ser empírica e deve considerar a prevalência dos uropatógenos nas diversas faixas etárias e sexo. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a prevalência de uropatógenos em ITU comunitária e sua relação com idade e sexo. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal conduzido em pronto socorro (PS) de hospital geral, de janeiro a dezembro, 2010, em pacientes menores de 15 anos com suspeita clínica de ITU, que colheram urocultura quantitativa. Definida ITU como urocultura com crescimento de agente único > 100.000 unidades formadoras de colônia (ufc)/mL na coleta por jato médio ou > 50.000 ufc/mL na coleta por sondagem vesical. RESULTADOS: Ocorreram 63.464 atendimentos no PS. Foram obtidas 2.577 uroculturas; destas, 291 foram positivas para ITU (prevalência = 11,3% das suspeitas clínicas e 0,46% dos atendimentos); 212 casos (72,8%) em meninas, mediana de idade = 2,6 anos. O uropatógeno predominante foi E.coli (76,6%), seguido por Proteus mirabilis (10,3%) e Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4,1%). Em lactentes < 3 meses, a prevalência de E.coli foi significativamente menor (50% x 78,4%; OR = 0,276; p = 0,006). Maior prevalência de Staphylococcus saprophyticus ocorreu em pacientes > 10 anos (24,4% x 0,4%; OR = 79,265; p < 0,0001). Proteus mirabilis foi significativamente mais prevalente em meninos (24,0% x 5,2%; OR = 5,786; p < 0,001). CONCLUSÕES: E. coli foi o uropatógeno mais prevalente das ITU comunitárias. Entretanto, na escolha do antimicrobiano empírico inicial, deve-se levar em consideração a prevalência significativa de outros agentes diferentes de E. coli em lactentes < 3 meses, a alta prevalência de Staphylococcus saprophyticus em pacientes > 10 anos e de Proteus mirabilis em meninos.

INTRODUCTION: Choosing the antimicrobial agent for initial therapy of urinary tract infection (UTI) is usually empirical and should consider the prevalence of uropathogens in different age groups and gender. OBJECTIVE: To establish prevalence rates of uropathogens in community-acquired UTI in relation to age and gender. METHODS: Crosssectional study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a general hospital, from January to December, 2010, in patients younger than 15 years old who had clinical suspicion of UTI and collected quantitative urine culture. UTI was defined as urine culture with growth of a single agent > 100.000 colony forming units (cfu)/mL in a midstream collection or > 50.000 cfu/mL in urethral catheterization. RESULTS: There were 63.464 visits to ED. 2577 urine cultures were obtained, of whom 291 were positive for UTI (prevalence = 11.3% of clinical suspicion and 0.46% of visits), 212 cases (72.8%) in females, median age = 2.6 years. The predominant uropathogen was E. coli (76.6%), followed by Proteus mirabilis (10.3%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.1%). Among infants < 3 months, prevalence rates of E. coli were significantly lower (50% vs 78.4%; OR = 0.276; p = 0.006). Higher prevalences of Staphylococcus saprophyticus occurred among patients > 10 years (24.4% vs 0.4%; OR = 79.265; p < 0.0001). Proteus mirabilis was significantly more prevalent in boys than girls (24.0% vs 5.2%; OR = 5.786; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli was the most prevalent community-acquired uropathogen. Nevertheless, initial empiric antimicrobial treatment of UTI should consider the significant prevalence of other agents different from E. coli in infants < 3 months, the high prevalence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus in patients > 10 years and Proteus mirabilis in males.