Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation of the epileptogenic zone as a treatment and predictor of future success of further surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used as a treatment for drug-resistant localization-related epilepsy. The aim of this study is to analyze the successes and failures using RFA and how response correlates with surgical epilepsy treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent RFA via SEEG electrodes. After excluding five, the remaining 57 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Forty patients (70%) underwent a secondary surgical procedure, of whom 32 were delayed: 26 laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), five resection, one neuromodulation. We determined the predictive value of RFA outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the transient time of seizure freedom after RFA were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Twelve of 49 patients (24.5%) who had RFA alone and delayed follow-up achieved Engel class I. Of the 32 patients who underwent a delayed secondary surgical procedure, 15 achieved Engel class I and nine Engel class II (24 successes), and eight were considered failures (Engel class III/IV). The transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was significantly longer in the success group (4 months, SD = 2.6) as compared to the failure group (.75 months, SD = 1.16; p < .001). Additionally, there was a higher portion of preoperative lesional findings in patients in the RFA alone and delayed surgical success group (p = .03) and a longer time to seizure recurrence in the presence of lesions (p < .05). Side effects occurred in 1% of patients. SIGNIFICANCE: In this series, RFA provided a treatment during SEEG-guided intracranial monitoring that led to seizure freedom in ~25% of patients. Of the 70% who underwent delayed surgery, longer transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was predictive of the results of the secondary surgeries, 74% of which were LITT.

Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak from cervical gunshot wounds with external ventricular drainage: a small case series.

Historically, the surgical management of gunshot wounds to the spine has been controversial. Repair of a persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a generally agreed upon indication. The management of such CSF leaks typically involves lumbar drainage or direct surgical repair. Here, the authors report two cases of CSF diversion with an external ventricular drain (EVD) in patients with cervical gunshot wounds. Both patients had spinal canal obliteration or physiologic myelographic block at or below the level of injury. To the best of the author's knowledge, these are the first two reports of successful EVD treatment of persistent CSF leaks related cervical gunshot wounds. The authors also propose a CSF treatment algorithm for cervical gunshot wounds that includes EVD.

Minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for thoracolumbar traumatic burst fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The need for anterior column reconstruction after thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Here, the authors present their experience with minimally invasive lateral thoracolumbar corpectomies for traumatic fractures. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2019, 59 patients with 65 thoracolumbar fractures underwent 65 minimally invasive lateral corpectomies (MIS group). This group was compared to 16 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures who had undergone open lateral corpectomies with the assistance of general surgery between 2007 and 2011 (open control group). Comparisons of the two groups were made with regard to operative time, estimated blood loss, time to ambulation, and fusion rates at 1 year postoperatively. The authors further analyzed the MIS group with regard to injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, neurological outcome, and complications. RESULTS: Patients in the MIS group had a significantly shorter mean operative time (228.3 ± 27.9 vs 255.6 ± 34.1 minutes, p = 0.001) and significantly shorter mean time to ambulation after surgery (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.0 ± 0.8 days, p < 0.001) than the open corpectomy group. Mean estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between the two groups, though the MIS group did trend toward a lower mean blood loss. There was no significant difference in fusion status at 1 year between the MIS and open groups; however, this comparison was limited by poor follow-up, with only 32 of 59 patients (54.2%) in the MIS group and 8 of 16 (50%) in the open group having available imaging at 1 year. Complications in the MIS group included 1 screw misplacement requiring revision, 2 postoperative femoral neuropathies (one of which improved), 1 return to surgery for inadequate posterior decompression, 4 pneumothoraces requiring chest tube placement, and 1 posterior wound infection. The rate of revision surgery for the failure of fusion in the MIS group was 1.7% (1 of 59 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive lateral thoracolumbar corpectomy approach for traumatic fractures appears to be relatively safe and may result in shorter operative times and quicker mobilization as compared to those with open techniques. This should be considered as a treatment option for thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Minimally Invasive Management of Civilian Gunshot Wounds to the Lumbar Spine: A Case Series and Technical Report.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of penetrating gunshot wounds (GSW) to the spine remains controversial. The decision to operate is often based on surgeon preference and experience. We present a case series of 7 patients who underwent minimally invasive thoracolumbar/sacral decompression and bullet removal at a level 1 trauma center. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of minimally invasive techniques to achieve decompression and bullet removal for GSW to the spine. METHODS: From 2010 to 2017, 7 patients with spinal GSW underwent minimally invasive decompression and bullet removal at an academic level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 20 to 55 yr (mean: 31 yr). The mechanisms of injury were GSW to the abdomen/pelvis (n = 6) and direct GSW to the spine (n = 1). Based on the neurological examination, the injuries were characterized as complete (n = 1) or incomplete (n = 6). Decompression and bullet removal were performed using a tubular retractor system. All patients with incomplete injuries who had postdischarge follow-up demonstrated some neurologic recovery. There were no postoperative wound infections, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas, or other complications related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive decompression and bullet removal is a safe technique that may help reduce the risk of postoperative infections and CSF fistulas in patients with GSW to the lumbar spine compared to the standard open technique. This approach appears to be particularly beneficial in patients with incomplete injuries and neuropathic pain refractory to medical treatment.