Comparison of lumbar drainage and external ventricular drainage for clearance of subarachnoid clots after Guglielmi detachable coil embolization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Subarachnoid clots play an important role in development of delayed vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The purpose of this study was to compare clearance of subarachnoid clots using external ventricular drainage (EVD) or lumbar drainage (LD) after Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) embolization for aneurysmal SAH. METHODS: The subjects were 51 treated with GDC coil embolization for aneurysmal Fisher group 3 SAH within 72 h of ictus. Software-based volumetric quantification of the subarachnoid clots was performed on CT scans and the hemoglobin (Hb) level was measured in CSF drained from each catheter. RESULTS: Clearance of subarachnoid clots was more rapid in patients treated with LD (n=34) compared to those treated with EVD (n=17). The Hb level in CSF was significantly higher in the LD group on Days 4-5 after onset of SAH (P<0.05), but was higher in the EVD group on Days 8-9. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm did not differ between the two groups. The rate of occurrence of a new low density area on CT scans was higher in patients treated with EVD, but not significantly higher than the rate in the LD group. CONCLUSION: GDC embolization followed by lumbar drainage accelerates the reduction of subarachnoid clots, but EVD may contribute to stasis of hemorrhage within subarachnoid spaces.

Fate of clots in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage after different surgical treatment modality: a comparison between surgical clipping and Guglielmi detachable coil embolization.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid clot is important in the development of delayed vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the clearance of subarachnoid clot and the incidence of symptomatic vasospasm in surgical clipping and embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils for aneurysmal SAH. METHODS: The subjects were 115 patients with Fisher group 3 aneurysmal SAH on computed tomography scan at admission whose aneurysm was treated by surgical clipping (clip group; n = 86) or Guglielmi detachable coil embolization (coil group; n = 29) within 72 hours of ictus. Software-based volumetric quantification of the subarachnoid clot was performed, and the amount of hemoglobin in drained cerebrospinal fluid was measured. RESULTS: Clearance of the subarachnoid clot on the computed tomography scan was rapid in the clip group until the day after the operation but slow in the coil group (58.9% removed vs 27.8% removed; P = .008). However, postoperative clearance of the clot occurred more rapidly in the coil group. Reduction of the clot until days 3 through 5 did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (72.9% removed vs 75.2% removed). The amount of hemoglobin in the clip group was > 0.8 g/d until day 3 and then gradually decreased (n = 15), but hemoglobin in the coil group remained at > 0.8 g/d until day 5 (n = 17). The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Subarachnoid clot can be removed directly during surgical clipping, which is not possible with endovascular treatment. However, the percentage reduction of the clot on days 3 through 5 did not differ between the 2 groups.