Forearm and elbow secondary surgical procedures in neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic scoping review.

Background: Neonatal Brachial plexus palsy is an injury during delivery that can lead to loss of motor function and limited range of motion in patients due to damage of nerves in the brachial plexus. This scoping review aims to explore types of procedures performed and assess outcomes of forearm and elbow secondary surgery in pediatric patients. Methods: Searches of PubMed, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Sciences, and Scopus were completed to obtain studies describing surgical treatment of elbow and forearm in pediatric patients with neonatal Brachial plexus palsy. 865 abstracts and titles were screened by two independent reviewers resulting in 295 full text papers; after applying of inclusion and exclusion criteria 18 articles were included. The level of evidence of this study is level IV. Results: Ten main procedures were performed to regain function of the forearm and elbow in neonatal brachial plexus birth palsy patients. Procedures had different aims, with supination contracture (6) and elbow flexion restoration (5) being the most prevalent. The variance between preoperative and postoperative soft tissue and bony procedures outcomes decreased and showed improvement with respect to the aim of each procedure category. For soft tissue procedures, a statistically significant increase was found between preoperative and postoperative values for active elbow flexion, passive supination, and active supination. For bony procedures, there was a statistically significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative values of passive and active supination. Conclusion: Overall, all procedures completed in the assessed articles of this study were successful in their aim. Bony procedures, specifically osteotomies, were found to have a wider range of results, whereas soft tissue procedures were found to be more consistent and reproducible with respect to their outcomes. Bony and soft tissue procedures were found vary in their aims and outcomes. This study indicates the need for further research to augment knowledge about indications and long-term benefits to each procedure.

Outcomes of humeral osteotomies versus soft-tissue procedures in secondary surgical procedures for neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis.

Secondary surgical procedures can be used in brachial plexus birth injury to correct shoulder movement imbalances. This study compares outcomes of the two secondary surgical procedure types: humeral osteotomies and soft tissue procedures. Outcome measures assessed included active and passive internal and external rotation, active and passive abduction and adduction, active and passive flexion and extension, percentage of the humeral head anterior to the middle glenoid fossa, glenoid version, and Mallet Score. Nineteen full-text articles were included in the analysis. Humeral osteotomies resulted in a loss of internal rotation postoperatively (-15.94°). Active internal rotation was not evaluated for soft tissue procedures. All other assessed outcomes were improved postoperatively for bony and soft tissue procedures. Bony procedures exhibited a greater degree of active external rotation postoperatively when compared to soft tissue procedures (+67° vs. +40°). Both bony and soft tissue procedures Improve shoulder function in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy, however, soft tissue procedures showed greater consistency in outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV.

Extent of Surgery for Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the extent of surgery and overall survival in follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical intervention for FTC from 2004 to 2015 were selected. Patients were >18 years old, with tumor size 1-4 cm, no other malignancies, and >0 follow up time. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on extent of surgery: lobectomy (≥1 lobe resected) and thyroidectomy (total or near total resection). Pearson's chi-squared analysis was used to compare cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox hazards models were utilized to determine overall survival between two cohorts with p < 0.05 used for significance. RESULTS: A total of 6871 patients were identified with FTC, of which 1507 patients underwent lobectomy and 5364 patients underwent total thyroidectomy. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, comorbidity index, local spread, or tumor grade. Patients undergoing lobectomy had mean survival of 12.94 versus 12.71 years for those undergoing thyroidectomy. Extent of surgery was not associated with a significant difference in survival (5 years OS = 96% in lobectomy and 95.5% in total thyroidectomy, p = 0.08). Stratification by tumor grade resulted in no significant difference in survival between lobectomy and thyroidectomy. CONCLUSION: Survival time was not significantly different in patients with more extensive resection of FTC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:993-999, 2023.

Evaluation of h-index in Academic Interventional Radiology.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the association of h-index, a widely used bibliometric factor used to determine promotions and grant allocations, with academic ranking, sex, and geographic distribution in the interventional radiology community. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database of all academic interventional radiologists in the US was created; academic rank, sex, institution, and geographic location were obtained. The Scopus database was used to determine the physicians' h-index. RESULTS: Our query identified 832 board-certified interventional radiologists. The mean h-index amongst all interventional radiologists was 10.81 ± 13.17 (median, 7; range, 0-167). H-indices were significantly different amongst assistant professors, associate professors, and professors (p < 0.0001). Our query identified 724 male interventional radiologists and 108 female interventional radiologists. The mean h-index amongst male interventional radiologists was 11.27 ± 13.69 (median, 7; range, 0-167) and amongst female interventional radiologists was 7.72 ± 8.33 (median, 5; range, 0-47). When stratified by rank, there was no statistically significant difference in h-index between male and female interventional radiologists. Multiple regression analysis identified sex is not significantly associated with h-index, but academic rank and region are. CONCLUSION: H-index in academic interventional radiology correlates significantly with faculty position and may be a factor in determining academic promotion. The sex-based differences in h-index seem to be due to the greater number of male faculty in senior academic positions who have been in the field for longer.