Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients Aged ≤70 Years.

Objectives: The efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) against abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in younger patients remains unknown. Hence, the current study aimed to investigate whether the aneurysm-related mortality rate of EVAR is acceptable among patients aged ≤70 years. Methods: Among 644 patients, 148 underwent EVAR (EVAR group), and 496 received open surgical repair (OSR group). The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events after AAA repair were evaluated using the cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks. Results: The EVAR group had higher prevalences of several comorbidities, and overall survival for the EVAR group was significantly inferior to that of the OSR group. The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events at 5 years were 1.5%, 11.7%, and 6.4% in the EVAR group and 1.3%, 5.3%, and 5.9% in the OSR group, respectively. EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. However, it was an independent poor prognostic factor of any intervention. Conclusion: EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. Therefore, it demonstrated acceptable procedure-related long-term outcomes, at least in high-risk young patients.

Influence of Type 2 Endoleaks on Long-Term Outcomes after Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A National Hospital Organization Network Study for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Although endovascular repair (EVAR) is the first-line treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm, type 2 endoleak (EL), which is associated with late sac enlargement or rupture, remains a concern. The present study aimed to assess the influence of type 2 EL on long-term outcomes after EVAR. METHODS: Among 550 patients who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2013 at 14 Japanese national hospitals, 135 patients had type 2 EL diagnosed on follow-up computed tomography (CT) within 12 months after EVAR (EL2[+] group) and 415 patients did not have EL within 12 months (EL2[-] group). The cumulative incidences of sac enlargement, late intervention, and aneurysm-related death after EVAR were estimated using the cumulative incidence function method, and prognostic factors were investigated using the Fine-Gray hazard model. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 5 years, and the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of sac enlargement, late intervention, and aneurysm-related death were 30.7% ± 4.4%, 25.3% ± 4.1%, and 2.6% ± 1.4%, respectively, in the EL2(+) group, and 8.7% ± 1.6%, 7.6% ± 1.4%, and 0.3% ± 0.3%, respectively, in the EL2(-) group. The cumulative incidence rates of sac enlargement (P = 0.002), late intervention (P < 0.001), and aneurysm-related death (P = 0.015) were significantly different between the 2 groups. As the first-line treatment for sac enlargement with type 2 EL, transcatheter coil embolization was performed in 30 patients. Information about sac behavior on CT after coil embolization was available in 20 of the 30 patients. Among these patients, no patients experienced sac shrinkage, and the aneurysmal sac dilated after coil embolization in 18 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 EL affects the long-term outcomes after EVAR. It is not recommended to observe large aneurysmal sacs conservatively as they tend to dilate in the presence of type 2 EL.

Late Sac Behavior after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Sac behavior after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is considered as a surrogate for the risk of late rupture. The purpose of the study is to assess the sac behavior of AAAs after EVAR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Late sac enlargement (LSE) (≥5 mm) and late sac shrinkage (LSS) (≥5 mm) were analyzed in 589 consecutive patients who were registered at 14 national centers in Japan. The proportions of patients who had LSE at 1, 3 and 5 years were 2.6% ± 0.7%, 10.0% ± 1.6% and 19.0% ± 2.9%. The proportions of patients who had LSS at 1, 3 and 5 years were 50.1% ± 0.7%, 59.2% ± 2.3% and 61.7% ± 2.7%. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified two variables as a risk factor for LSE; persistent endoleak (Odds ratio 9.56 (4.84-19.49), P <0.001) and low platelet count (Odds ratio 0.92 (0.86-0.99), P = 0.0224). The leading cause of endoleak in patients with LSE was type II. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LSE is not negligible over 5 year period. Patients with persistent endoleak and/or low platelet count should carefully be observed for LSE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000008345).

Is Endovascular Aneurysm Repair a Relative Contraindication for Patients with Preoperative Renal Dysfunction?

UNLABELLED: Whether endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relative contraindication in patients with preoperative renal dysfunction (Pre-RD), remains controversial because the contrast medium may induce nephrotoxicity. In this study 1658 patients were treated at ten Japanese medical centers between January 2005 and March 2011 (Open surgery (OS) vs. EVAR: n = 1270 vs. n = 388). They were retrospectively analyzed. Multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) with pre- and intra-operative variables was applied to all patients. The endpoints induced onset of new dialysis and postoperative renal dysfunction (Post-RD), were defined as a 50% decrease or more from the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level. RESULTS: Early mortality, Post-RD, incidence of new dialysis in all patients were 1.6% (OS: EVAR = 1.9%:0.8%), 6% (OS: EVAR = 8%:2.3%) and 1.4% (OS: EVAR = 1.5%:1.0%) respectively. MLRA identified operation time, clamp of renal artery as risk factors for Post-RD, and operation time and Pre-eGFR level as risk factors for new dialysis. CONCLUSION: Although Post-RD was more frequently observed in the OS group, MLRA showed that the choice of OS or EVAR was not a risk factor for Post-RD and new dialysis. It was strongly suggested that using contrast medium during EVAR is not a contraindication to AAA repair in patients with Pre-RD. (This article is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2014; 54: 13-18.).

[Experience of Mitral Valve Replacement Using a Pulmonary Autograft (Ross II Operation) in an Infant;Report of a Case].

A 24-day-old boy suddenly developed progressive heart failure and was transported to our hospital. Echocardiography showed massive mitral regurgitation due to chordal rupture. Mitral valve repair was performed at 28 days of life, but postoperative valvular function was not satisfactory. A mechanical valve was implanted in the supra-annular position at 37 days of life. Two months after valve replacement, the mechanical valve was suddenly stuck. Emergent redo valve replacement was performed, but the prosthetic valve became stuck again 2 months after the 3rd operation, despite sufficient anti-coagulation therapy. At the 4th operation (6 months after birth), we implanted a pulmonary autograft in the mitral position instead of another mechanical valve in an emergent operation. The right ventricular outflow tract was reconstructed with a valved conduit. A postoperative catheter examination, which was performed 1 year after the Ross II operation, showed mild mitral stenosis with no regurgitation. Previous reports of Ross II operations in infants are rare and long-term results are unknown. However, we advocate that this procedure should be a rescue operation for mitral valve dysfunction in the early period of infants.

Impact of introducing endovascular aneurysm repair on treatment strategy for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm--National Hospital Organization network study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to assess the hypothesis that the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) into Japan has expanded the indication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair without increasing surgical mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 10 national hospitals, we registered a total of 2,154 consecutive patients (Open surgery [OS]: n=1,577, EVAR: n=577) over 8 years, divided into 4 time periods: Group I (2005-2006: n=522), Group II (2007-2008: n=475), Group III (2009-2010: n=551), Group IV, (2011-2012: n=606). Mean age increased over the 4 time periods (P<0.0001). The incidences of COPD, smoking history, history of abdominal surgery and concomitant malignancy significantly increased as well, while the numbers of patients with preoperative shock or high ASA status reduced over time. The proportion of EVAR in AAA repair increased from: 0% in Group I, 11.6% in Group II, 41.0% in Group III, to 48.8% in Group IV (P<0.0001). Early mortality was 0.8% in the EVAR and 3.4% in the OS (P<0.001) groups. Survival rates among the 4 groups free of all-cause death and aneurysm-related death at 1 year were 92.1-96.3% (P=0.1555) and 95.5-96.8% (P=0.9891), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis for surgical death failed to demonstrate survival advantage of EVAR over OS. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of EVAR expanded the indication of AAA repair without increasing mortality, while high risk for anesthesia and emergency cases reduced over time. UMIN-CTR (UMIN000008345).

A novel Doppler echocardiographic score reflecting cardiac functional status can predict adverse outcome in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: E/e' and s' are thought to reflect left ventricular diastolic and systolic function, respectively. However, there are no reports on the combined use of E/e' and s' in predicting the outcome in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: For 20 months beginning in October 2006, we enrolled 65 AMI patients who had undergone Swan-Ganz (SG) catheterization and echocardiography just after reperfusion therapy. We measured the cardiac index (CI) and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) via an SG catheter and determined routine echocardiographic indices, including transmitral flow velocity (E), mitral annulus velocities at systole (s') and early diastole (e'), and E/e'. In addition, we rounded off the values of s' (cm/s) and E/e' (ratio of cm/s to cm/s) to the nearest integer, and designated them the s'-score and E/e'-score, respectively. We also defined the cardiac status score as the s'-score subtracted from the E/e'-score. In Study 1, we investigated the relationships between hemodynamic parameters (CI and PCWP) and echocardiographic indices, including the cardiac status score. In Study 2, we excluded patients with Killip class ≥II, yielding a final study population of 55 patients in whom we investigated whether the cardiac status score could predict adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: Only the cardiac status score significantly correlated with both the PCWP and the CI. In the Cox proportional hazards model, significant predictors were the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and cardiac score ≥3.0. CONCLUSIONS: The novel score achieved in this study by subtracting the s'-score from the E/e'-score could be highly useful for predicting outcomes in AMI with Killip class I.

Early outcomes of open abdominal repair versus endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: report from national hospital organization network study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Early outcomes of open abdominal repair (OS) versus endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm were retrospectively analyzed, after commercialized devices for EVAR had become available in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 781 consecutive patients (OS, n = 522; EVAR, n = 259) were treated at ten medical centers between January 2008 and September 2010. The OS group comprised patients with preoperative shock (SOS, n = 34) and without shock (NOS, n = 488). RESULTS: Patients in the EVAR group were 3 years older than those in the NOS group. There was greater prevalence of hostile abdomen, on dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on inhaled drug, and cerebrovascular disease in the EVAR group than in the NOS group. Surgical mortality was 16 cases (2.0% in all patients, EVAR: 0.8%, NOS: 1.4%, SOS: 21%). Hospital stay >30 days was documented in 52 (11%) with NOS, 11 (33%) with SOS, and 8 (3%) with EVAR. Thirty late deaths included 6 aneurysm related death and 14 cardiovascular causes at a mean follow up of 1.0 year. The survival rates freedom from all cause death at one year, were 95 ± 1% in NOS and 94 ± 2% in EVAR respectively. CONCLUSION: Though significant differences in patient characteristics among three groups were noted, early results were satisfactory.

Early outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: first preliminary report of national hospital organization network study in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to assess the early outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the Japanese population, a total of 183 patients who had EVAR at eight medical centers of the National Hospital Organization were retrospectively reviewed and registered. The mean number of registered cases in each center was 23 ± 17 (4-50 cases). Patient characteristics were male sex, 84%; mean age, 77 years; age ≥ 80 years, 40%. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was one case (0.5%). Endoleaks were observed at the end of the procedure in 35 patients (19%: type I: n = 4, II: n = 22, III, n = 3, IV: n = 6). Early morbidity included delayed wound healing or infection (n = 7), deterioration of renal dysfunction (n = 3), stroke (n = 2), postoperative bleeding (n = 2), gastrointestinal complications (n = 2), and peripheral thromboembolism (n = 2). Eleven late deaths included one of unknown cause and six cardiovascular causes at a mean follow up of 1.0 year. Survival rates of freedom from all causes of death and from aneurysm-related death at one year were 95.4% ± 1.7% and 99.5% ± 0.5%, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Although registered patients carry a variety of risks, early outcomes were satisfactory. EVAR is an acceptable alternative treatment modality for treating AAA.