Current Status and Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Immunotherapy in Oral Malignant Melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, have initiated a new era in the treatment of malignant melanoma. ICIs can be used in various settings, including first-line, adjuvant, and neo-adjuvant therapy. In the scope of this review, we examined clinical studies utilizing ICIs in the context of treating oral mucosal melanoma, a rare disease, albeit with an extremely poor prognosis, with a specific focus on unraveling the intricate web of resistance mechanisms. The absence of a comprehensive review focusing on ICIs in oral mucosal melanoma is notable. Therefore, this review seeks to address this deficiency by offering a novel and thorough analysis of the current status, potential resistance mechanisms, and future prospects of applying ICIs specifically to oral malignant melanoma. Clarifying and thoroughly understanding these mechanisms will facilitate the advancement of effective therapeutic approaches and enhance the prospects for patients suffering from oral mucosal melanoma.

Functional inhibition of MEF2 by C/EBP is a possible mechanism of leukemia development by CEBP-IGH fusion gene.

CEBPA-IGH, a fusion gene of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus (IGH) and the CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) gene, is recurrently found in B-ALL cases and causes aberrant expression of C/EBPα, a master regulator of granulocyte differentiation, in B cells. Forced expression of C/EBPα in B cells was reported to cause loss of B-cell identity due to the inhibition of Pax5, a master regulator of B-cell differentiation; however, it is not known whether the same mechanism is applicable for B-ALL development by CEBPA-IGH. It is known that a full-length isoform of C/EBPα, p42, promotes myeloid differentiation, whereas its N-terminal truncated isoform, p30, inhibits myeloid differentiation through the inhibition of p42; however, the differential role between p42 and p30 in ALL development has not been clarified. In the present study, we examined the effect of the expression of p42 and p30 in B cells by performing RNA-seq of mRNA from LCL stably transfected with p42 or p30. Unexpectedly, suppression of PAX5 target genes was barely observed. Instead, both isoforms suppressed the target genes of MEF2 family members (MEF2s), other regulators of B-cell differentiation. Similarly, MEF2s target genes rather than PAX5 target genes were suppressed in CEBP-IGH-positive ALL (n = 8) compared with other B-ALL (n = 315). Furthermore, binding of both isoforms to MEF2s target genes and the reduction of surrounding histone acetylation were observed in ChIP-qPCR. Our data suggest that the inhibition of MEF2s by C/EBPα plays a role in the development of CEBPA-IGH-positive ALL and that both isoforms work co-operatively to achieve it.