Risk of second cancer from scattered radiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapies with lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of secondary cancer from scattered and leakage doses following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: IMRT, VMAT and TOMO were planned for five lung cancer patients. Organ equivalent doses (OEDs) are estimated from the measured corresponding secondary doses during irradiation at various points 20 to 80 cm from the iso-center by using radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeter (RPLGD). RESULTS: The secondary dose per Gy from IMRT, VMAT and TOMO for lung cancer, measured 20 to 80 cm from the iso-center, are 0.02~2.03, 0.03~1.35 and 0.04~0.46 cGy, respectively. The mean values of relative OED of secondary dose of VMAT and TOMO, which is normalized by IMRT, ranged between 88.63% and 41.59% revealing 88.63% and 41.59% for thyroid, 82.33% and 41.85% for pancreas, 77.97% and 49.41% for bowel, 73.42% and 72.55% for rectum, 74.16% and 81.51% for prostate. The secondary dose and OED from TOMO became similar to those from IMRT and VMAT as the distance from the field edge increased. CONCLUSIONS: OED based estimation suggests that the secondary cancer risk from TOMO is less than or comparable to the risks from conventional IMRT and VMAT.

Feasibility study of radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter postal dose intercomparison for high energy photon beam.

A radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter (GRD) system has recently become commercially available. In this study we evaluated whether the GRD would be suitable for external dosimetric audit program in radiotherapy. For this purpose, we introduced a methodology of the absorbed dose determination with the GRD by establishing calibration coefficient and various correction factors (non-linearity dose response, fading, energy dependence and angular dependence). A feasibility test of the GRD postal dose intercomparison was also performed for eight high photon beams by considering four radiotherapy centers in Korea. In the accuracy evaluation of the GRD dosimetry established in this study, we obtained within 1.5% agreements with the ionization chamber dosimetry for the (60)Co beam. It was also observed that, in the feasibility study, all the relative deviations were smaller than 3%. Based on these results, we believe that the new GRD system has considerable potential to be used for a postal dose audit program.

Rectum dose analysis employing a multi-purpose brachytherapy phantom.

PURPOSE: It is difficult to reproduce a brachytherapy measurement because of changes in the rectal shape during inter-fraction. We constructed a multi-purpose brachytherapy phantom (MPBP) and reproduced the same conditions found in actual therapy. We further attempted to apply the measured optimal dose to reduce rectal complications. METHODS: A measured dose was administered at rectal reference point R1 using a diode detector in four patients who used a tandem and ovoid in brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. A total number of 20 rectal dose measurements were performed five times per patient. In addition, discrepancies in the set-up of the diode detector were analyzed with each repetitive measurement. After reproducing the same conditions as found in actual therapy using a multi-function applicator (MFA) in the multi-purpose brachytherapy phantom constructed for this study, the dose was measured at reference points in the rectum using a thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD). RESULTS: According to the discrepancies measured in the set-up using a diode detector, Patient 1 showed a maximum value of 11.25 +/- 0.95 mm in the Y direction, Patients 2 and 3 exhibited 9.90 +/- 2.40 mm and 20.85 +/- 4.50 mm in the Z direction, respectively. Patient 4 showed 19.15 +/- 3.33 mm in the Z direction. In addition, values of the mean dose according to the position of the diode detector were recorded as 122.82 +/- 7.96-323.78 +/- 11.16 cGy. In the measured results for TLD in an MPBP, relative error for Patients 1 and 4 at the rectal reference point R2 were a maximum of 8.6 and 7.7%, respectively. For Patients 2 and 3 they were 1.7 and 1.2%, respectively. Furthermore, the dose measured at point R1 and R2 exhibited values approximately 1.7-8.6% higher than the dose calculated in advance, excluding point R1 in Patient 2. The discrepancies in the set-up owing to repetitive measurements and alterations in dosage according to these changes were not analyzed. It was evident that the relative error between the calculated and measured value was within 15%, which was allowable according to the recommendations by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). CONCLUSIONS: The multi-purpose brachytherapy phantom constructed for this study successfully reproduced an optimal dose measured under the same conditions found in actual therapy in which the dose was precisely analyzed at a rectal reference point. In addition, these results were considered reliable and applicable for dose optimization before applying therapy using the measured data from the phantom in order to reduce rectal complications.