Complications of Arthroscopic Versus Open Biceps Tenodesis in the Setting of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: An Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates between arthroscopic versus open biceps tenodesis in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to determine the effect of fellowship training on complication rates. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was used to identify cases of arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis in the setting of rotator cuff repair between 2012 and 2016. Surgical, medical, and anesthetic complications, location, fellowship training, surgery year, and patient demographic data were recorded. Overall and specific complication rates were calculated and analyzed. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Altogether, 1,725 cases of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis and 1,637 cases of open biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were analyzed. No significant difference was found between overall complication rates between arthroscopic (11.4%) versus open (13.1%) biceps tenodesis (P = 0.14). Although open tenodesis had statistically significant higher rates of wound healing issues (0.7% versus 0.2%, P = 0.02), hematoma/seroma formation (0.5% versus 0.1%, P = 0.02), nerve injury (1.5% versus 0.4%, P < 0.01), deep vein thrombosis (0.49% versus 0.12%, P ≤ 0.05), and general anesthetic complications (0.75% versus 0.06%, P = 0.03), these rates remain comparably low. Shoulder arthroscopy fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to use arthroscopic techniques than non-fellowship-trained surgeons (P < 0.01) but had a higher complication rate (P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: No differences were found in overall complication rates between open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in the setting of rotator cuff repairs. Although open techniques had statistically significant higher rates of nerve injury, wound complications, and hematoma/seroma formation, this may not reflect clinical significance because these complication rates remained <2% in both techniques. Higher complication rates were seen among fellowship-trained surgeons, which may reflect greater case complexity. Both open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in the setting of rotator cuff repair show low complication rates, and the technique should be based on surgeon preference and patient factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Capsular Reconstruction for Subscapularis Deficiency: The Definitive Treatment or a Helpful Adjunct?

Anterior glenohumeral instability in the setting of irreparable subscapularis deficiency represents a difficult clinical scenario for the treating shoulder surgeon. Anterior capsular reconstruction with humeral dermal allograft improved glenohumeral translation stability and range of motion to near-normal values whereas pectoralis major tendon transfer was unable to do so. However, placement of a static spacer does not restore the dynamic force couple or shoulder kinematics. Further research is needed to evaluate the functional outcomes using this reconstruction technique.

A Closer Look at the Relationship Between Industry and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: A recent study demonstrated that discrepancies exist between disclosures reported by authors publishing in The American Journal of Sports Medicine and disclosures listed in the Physician Payments Sunshine Act-initiated Open Payments database, managed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). However, no study to date has explored the relationship between the biopharmaceutical and device industry (industry) and the membership base of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM). PURPOSE: To critically examine the relationship between orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons and industry. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The publicly available CMS Open Payments database website was accessed to search for sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons in the United States who were members of the AOSSM. Financial data, specifically general, research, and ownership payments for 2015, were recorded for each surgeon. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) disclosures of each surgeon were then obtained. Descriptive statistics and simple proportions were calculated to summarize the collected data, including years in practice and amount of payment. Median values for general payments were compared to provide a more accurate reflection of payments transferred to a "typical" sports medicine surgeon. RESULTS: A total of $58,113,561 in general payments, $3,996,051 in research payments, $72,481,814 in money invested, and $144,552,383 in interest earned from money invested were identified as being paid to 2274 surgeons (all amounts in US$). The distribution of total general payments received was skewed: 10% of surgeons received 95.4% ($55,463,183) of the total general payments. A total of 1433 surgeons had completed, up-to-date AAOS disclosures. Although 44% (635 surgeons) self-reported no financial conflict to the AAOS, the Open Payments database indicated some level of industry support to these surgeons. Unreported general payments totaled $1,393,212, or a median of $561 per surgeon (interquartile range, $10-$200,048). CONCLUSION: Although orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons received substantial payments from industry, most of the total general payments were given to a small proportion of people. The regional distribution of these payments did not differ significantly. Summary reports of data are largely skewed by outliers and should be interpreted with caution. However, a large percentage of these surgeons failed to reveal industry support of any kind in their AAOS disclosures, including meals and educational funding, demonstrating the importance of transparency and accuracy when completing financial disclosures.

Topographic Analysis of the Distal Femoral Condyle Articular Cartilage Surface: Adequacy of the Graft from Opposite Condyles of the Same or Different Size for the Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the topography of the opposite condyle to treat focal femoral condyle articular defects with an osteochondral allograft (OCA). DESIGN: Three groups were created: Group 1, same condyle with same width; Group 2, opposite condyle with same width; Group 3, opposite condyle with different width. Computed tomography (CT) of 22 cadaveric femoral hemi-condyles was used to create 3-dimensional CT models that were exported into point-cloud models. Three zones of the donor condyle (anterior, middle, and posterior) were quantified. Four defect sizes were created (15, 18, 23, 25 mm) at the weight-bearing region. The defect was moved throughout each donor condyle zone and the least distance was calculated, defined as the shortest distance between the defect and the donor condyle. RESULTS: The mean least distance increased with larger defect size in all groups, yet there was a less than 0.2 mm difference in the least distance among defect sizes. The 15, 18, and 23 mm defect models in Group 1 exhibited greater least distances at the anterior than middle and posterior zones. The 15 mm defect model exhibited greater least distance at the anterior zone than posterior zone in Group 3. However, there was a less than 0.05 mm difference in the mean least distance between zones. There was no significant difference in the least distance between groups. CONCLUSION: OCAs from opposite condyles yield similar topographic matching to OCAs from the same condyles, suggesting that opposite condyles can be utilized. Clinical correlation and outcomes are necessary.

Quadratus lumborum block provides improved immediate postoperative analgesia and decreased opioid use compared with a multimodal pain regimen following hip arthroscopy.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect on immediate patient outcomes following hip arthroscopy with use of a preoperative, single shot quadratus lumborum (QL) block. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent hip arthroscopy following a preoperative QL block. These patients were matched by age and gender to patients who had not received a block. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores immediately postoperatively and at the time of discharge were recorded. Hourly and overall opioid intake in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was also recorded. Continuous data was analysed with paired t-test, with significance being defined as P < 0.05. Complications in the immediate postoperative period were recorded, as was time from admission to PACU to discharge. Fifty-six patients were included. Twenty-eight patients underwent QL block and 28 did not undergo a block. QL block patients required significantly less hydromorphone (P = 0.010) and oxycodone (P = 0.001) during their time in the PACU, and significantly fewer morphine equivalents overall and per hour in the PACU (P < 0.001). Despite receiving less opioid analgesia, QL block patients had significantly less pain immediately postoperatively (P = 0.026) and at the time of discharge (P = 0.015). The mean time to PACU discharge was 155 ± 49 min, and there was no difference in time to discharge between groups (P = 0.295). One patient in the QL block group experienced persistent flank numbness. Hip arthroscopy patients who received a preoperative QL block had less pain and a lower opioid requirement in PACU than those who did not receive a block. Level of Evidence: Level III (Retrospective matched cohort study).

Bone Bruise Patterns in Skeletally Immature Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Shock-Absorbing Function of the Physis.

BACKGROUND: Bone bruises are frequently found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and have been related to the force associated with the trauma. Yet, little is known about the bone bruise distribution pattern of skeletally immature (SI) patients, as the presence of an open physis may play a role in energy dissipation given its unique structure. PURPOSE: To describe and compare the location and distribution of tibial and femoral bone bruises, observed on MRI, between 2 groups of ACL-injured knees: the first group with an open physis and the second with a closed physis. Additionally, based on the bone bruise distribution pattern, the secondary aim of the study was to propose a new classification of bone bruise in SI patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all cases of primary ACL tears in patients ≤16 years old, with MRI within 6 weeks of injury between January 2012 and December 2016. Overall, 106 patients were identified: 53 with open physis (skeletally immature [SI] group) and 53 with closed physis as control (skeletally mature [SM] group). MRI scans were reviewed to assess for the presence and location of bone bruises. Longitudinal bone bruise distribution was described as epiphyseal and metaphyseal in both femur and tibia. The proposed classification for tibia and femur has 2 parts: the location of the bone bruise in the (I) lateral, (II) medial, or (III) medial and lateral parts of the bone; and if the bone bruise (a) does not or (b) does cross the physis. For the tibia, if the bone bruise is also present in the central portion, a letter C is added. RESULTS: The SI group had significantly fewer bone bruises cross the physis and extend into the metaphysis than did the SM group for both the tibia (25% vs 85%, respectively; P < .0001) and the femur (4% vs 42%; P < .0001). The most common patterns observed in the SI group were type IIICa in the tibia (medial/lateral and central, not extending into the metaphysis: 42%) and type Ia in the femur (lateral, not extending into the metaphysis: 59%). CONCLUSION: The data from this study shows that patients with an open physis at the occurrence of an acute ACL rupture have unique bone bruise patterns as compared with those with a closed physis. In the SI patients, the bone bruise pattern is significantly less frequently observed in the tibial and femoral metaphysis.

Refractory pain following hip arthroscopy: evaluation and management.

With increased knowledge and understanding of hip pathology, hip arthroscopy is rapidly becoming a popular treatment option for young patients with hip pain. Despite improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with arthroscopic treatment, some patients may have ongoing pain and less than satisfactory outcomes. While the reasons leading to failed hip arthroscopy are multifactorial, patient selection, surgical technique and rehabilitation all play a role. Patients with failed hip arthroscopy should undergo a thorough history and physical examination, as well as indicated imaging. A treatment plan should then be developed based on pertinent findings from the workup and in conjunction with the patient. Depending on the etiology of failed hip arthroscopy, management may be nonsurgical or surgical, which may include revision arthroscopic or open surgery, periacetabular osteotomy or joint arthroplasty. Revision surgery may be appropriate in settings including, but not limited to, incompletely treated femoroacetabular impingement, postoperative adhesions, heterotopic ossification, instability, hip dysplasia or advanced degeneration.

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With PEEK Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Analysis of Humeral Fracture Risk.

PURPOSE: To quantify the torsional load to fracture for subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. METHODS: We randomized 28 specimens from 14 matched-pair full-length humeri (mean age, 55.3 years) into 3 groups: (1) empty ream group (ERG), (2) screw-only group (SOG), and (3) screw-plus-biceps tendon group (SBG). In each group, 1 humerus of each matched pair was prepared according to group allocation and the contralateral humerus remained intact as a control. In the ERG, an 8-mm unicortical hole was reamed 1 cm proximal to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon insertion; in the SOG, the humerus was filled with an 8-mm × 12-mm PEEK (polyether ether ketone) screw; and in the SBG, the humerus was filled with a PEEK screw and the cadaveric long head of the biceps tendon. Humeri were tested under torsional displacement at a rate of 1°/s until fracture. Maximum torque, energy to maximum torque, and linear stiffness were used to assess humerus strength. RESULTS: Compared with contralateral intact specimens, the maximum torque to fracture was reduced by 28% in the ERG (P = .005), 30% in the SOG (P = .014), and 20% in the SBG (P = .046). Energy to maximum torque was similarly reduced in the ERG (P = .007), SOG (P = .023), and SBG (P = .049). Stiffness was increased by 4% in the ERG (P = .498), 9% in the SOG (P = .030), and 4% in the SBG (P = .439). CONCLUSIONS: Drilling an 8-mm unicortical hole in zone 3 of the bicipital tunnel for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis reduces the torsional load to humeral fracture up to 28% at time 0. The addition of a PEEK tenodesis screw alone reduced the maximum torque by 30%, and the addition of a screw with the long head of the biceps tendon reduced the maximum torque by 20%. The total load to fracture was reduced in all settings. Stiffness was not significantly different for the ERG and SBG, but stiffness was significantly higher for the SOG compared with the intact matched humeri at time 0. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When performing a biceps tenodesis, humeral fracture susceptibility is increased with an applied torsional load at time 0. Thus providers must be aware of this reduced integrity when a subpectoral biceps tenodesis is used.

Pain Management After Hip Arthroscopy: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy is often associated with significant postoperative pain and opioid-associated side effects. Effective pain management after hip arthroscopy improves patient recovery and satisfaction and decreases opioid-related complications. PURPOSE: To collect, examine, and provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence from randomized controlled trials and comparative studies on pain control after hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature for postoperative pain control after hip arthroscopy was performed using electronic databases. Only comparative clinical studies with level 1 to 3 evidence comparing a method of postoperative pain control with other modalities or placebo were included in this review. Case series and studies without a comparative cohort were excluded. RESULTS: Several methods of pain management have been described for hip arthroscopy. A total of 14 studies met our inclusion criteria: 3 on femoral nerve block, 3 on lumbar plexus block, 3 on fascia iliaca block, 4 on intra-articular injections, 2 on soft tissue surrounding surgical site injection, and 2 on celecoxib (4 studies compared 2 or more methods of analgesia). The heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for pooling of data. Single-injection femoral nerve blocks and lumbar plexus blocks provided improved analgesia, but increased fall rates were observed. Fascia iliaca blocks do not provide adequate pain relief when compared with surgical site infiltration with local anesthetic and are associated with increased risk of cutaneous nerve deficits. Patients receiving lumbar plexus block experienced significantly decreased pain compared with fascia iliaca block. Portal site and periacetabular injections provide superior analgesia compared with intra-articular injections alone. Preoperative oral celecoxib, compared with placebo, resulted in earlier time to discharge and provided significant pain relief up to 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Perioperative nerve blocks provide effective pain management after hip arthroscopy but must be used with caution to decrease risk of falls. Intra-articular and portal site injections with local anesthetics and preoperative celecoxib can decrease opioid consumption. There is a lack of high-quality evidence on this topic, and further research is needed to determine the best approach to manage postoperative pain and optimize patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995-2015.

PURPOSE: There is increasing emphasis on publication quality and internationalization of author groups in orthopaedic literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the type of studies and the level of evidence (LOE) published in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy (KSSTA) from 1995 to 2015. The secondary aim was to analyze trends in authorship characteristics in KSSTA. METHODS: Two reviewers reviewed the table of contents of KSSTA and identified original papers from 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. The reviewers graded LOE from Levels I to IV using guidelines from the University of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For each article, the total number of authors and country of author group were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 880 papers were analyzed. The proportions in LOE have stayed consistent throughout the study period (n.s.). There has been a significant increase in the number of published articles and the number of Level I and II studies (P < 0.01). Therapeutic articles were the most common type. The mean number of authors per KSSTA article significantly increased from 3.9 to 5.7 over the 20-year period (P < 0.01). The number of represented countries increased yearly and academic institutions from 40 different nationalities published articles in the Journal. Of the examined years, the percent of articles with international collaboration was 17.6%. CONCLUSION: The proportion of LOE I and II articles published in KSSTA remains consistently high. Therapeutic studies are the most frequently published articles. There is an increase in international groups publishing in KSSTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Complications After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder arthroscopies are among the most frequently performed surgeries by orthopaedic surgeons. Little is known about complication rates among recently trained surgeons. The purpose of this study was to examine the type and frequency of complications of common arthroscopic shoulder procedures performed by candidates challenging the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery: Part II, certification examination. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database for orthopaedic surgeons who sat for the part II examination from 2012 to 2016. In total, 27,072 procedures were reviewed. The database was queried to determine the type and frequency of complications for patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, labrum repair, biceps tenodesis, and bony/soft tissue débridement procedures. Complications were classified as surgical, anesthetic, or medical. Factors affecting complication rates were investigated including surgeon's fellowship training, geographic location, and patients' age and sex. RESULTS: Patients with surgical complications (n = 2,133; 7.9%) were more common than anesthetic (n = 263; 1.0%) or medical (n = 607; 2.2%) complications. There was a significant variation in the surgical complication rate among different arthroscopic shoulder procedures, ranging from 5.4% for labral repair to 10.3% for rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis. Stiffness/arthrofibrosis was the most commonly recorded surgical complication (2.2%). Surgical complication rates were lowest in the Northeast region (6.7%; P < 0.01) and in patients younger than 21 years (3.8%; P < 0.01). Women had significantly higher rate of complications than men (8.4% versus 7.6%; P = 0.02). Among anesthetic-related complications, 61.6% were related to regional nerve blocks. The overall revision surgery and readmission rates were 0.8% and 1.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall self-reported surgical complication rate for arthroscopic shoulder procedures was 7.9%, which is higher than the rates reported in the literature. Although the rate of anesthetic complications is low (1.0%), adverse events related to nerve blocks made up most of the overall anesthetic related complications.

Biomechanical Analysis of Latarjet Screw Fixation: Comparison of Screw Types and Fixation Methods.

PURPOSE: To compare the initial fixation stability, failure strength, and mode of failure of 5 different screw types and fixation methods commonly used for the classic Latarjet procedure. METHODS: Thirty-five fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens were allocated into 5 groups. A 25% anteroinferior glenoid defect was created, and a classic Latarjet coracoid transfer procedure was performed. All grafts were fixed with 2 screws, differing by screw type and/or fixation method. The groups included partially threaded solid 4.0-mm cancellous screws with bicortical fixation, partially threaded solid 4.0-mm cancellous screws with unicortical fixation, fully threaded solid 3.5-mm cortical screws with bicortical fixation, partially threaded cannulated 4.0-mm cancellous screws with bicortical fixation, and partially threaded cannulated 4.0-mm captured screws with bicortical fixation. All screws were stainless steel. Outcomes included cyclic creep and secant stiffness during cyclic loading, as well as load and work to failure during the failure test. Intergroup comparisons were made by a 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among different screw types or fixation methods in cyclic creep or secant stiffness after cyclic loading or in load to failure or work to failure during the failure test. Post-failure radiographs showed evidence of screw bending in only 1 specimen that underwent the Latarjet procedure with partially threaded solid cancellous screws with bicortical fixation. The mode of failure for all specimens analyzed was screw cutout. CONCLUSIONS: In this biomechanical study, screw type and fixation method did not significantly influence biomechanical performance in a classic Latarjet procedure. When performing this procedure, surgeons may continue to select the screw type and method of fixation (unicortical or bicortical) based on preference; however, further studies are required to determine the optimal method of treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons may choose the screw type and fixation method based on preference when performing the Latarjet procedure.

Midterm results of osteochondral allograft transplantation to the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated clinical outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for humeral head osteochondral defects. We hypothesized that patients with isolated humeral head disease would achieve favorable results and that patients with bipolar disease would experience inferior outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent humeral head OCA transplantation. Subjective questionnaire data were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Radiographs were evaluated for graft incorporation. Failure was defined by conversion to shoulder arthroplasty, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score <50, or dissatisfaction with the surgical result. RESULTS: Twenty patients (65% male) met inclusion criteria. Patients were an average age of 24.8 ± 8.1 years. Eleven patients underwent concomitant glenoid surgery (microfracture or meniscal allograft resurfacing). Follow-up was available for 18 patients (90%) at mean of 67 months. All grafts incorporated except 2. Four patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty at mean of 25 months postoperatively (all after pain pump chondrolysis). Eleven of the 20 patients were satisfied (all dissatisfied patients underwent glenoid surgery). Significant improvements (P < .001) were seen for the visual analog scale (from 6.1 to 1.5), Simple Shoulder Test (from 32 to 73), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (from 39 to 76), and the physical component of the 12-Item Short Form Survey (from 38 to 48). Pain pump patients who did not progress to arthroplasty experienced inferior satisfaction (40% vs. 87.5%, P = .04) and a trend toward inferior outcomes compared with the rest of the cohort. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation is a viable option for young patients with isolated humeral chondral injury. Patients with bipolar disease or a history of intra-articular pain pump have increased failure and decreased subjective outcomes.

Postoperative Rehabilitation After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Web-Based Survey of AANA and AOSSM Members.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains controversial and suffers from limited high-quality evidence. Therefore, appropriate use criteria must partially depend on expert opinion. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine and report on the standard and modified rehabilitation protocols after ARCR used by member orthopaedic surgeons of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA). We hypothesized that there will exist a high degree of variability among rehabilitation protocols. We also predict that surgeons will be prescribing accelerated rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A 29-question survey in English language was sent to all 3106 associate and active members of the AOSSM and the AANA. The questionnaire consisted of 4 categories: standard postoperative protocol, modification to postoperative rehabilitation, operative technique, and surgeon demographic data. Via email, the survey was sent on September 4, 2013. RESULTS: The average response rate per question was 22.7%, representing an average of 704 total responses per question. The most common immobilization device was an abduction pillow sling with the arm in neutral or slight internal rotation (70%). Surgeons tended toward later unrestricted passive shoulder range of motion at 6 to 7 weeks (35%). Strengthening exercises were most commonly prescribed between 6 weeks and 3 months (56%). Unrestricted return to activities was most commonly allowed at 5 to 6 months. The majority of the respondents agreed that they would change their protocol based on differences expressed in this survey. CONCLUSION: There is tremendous variability in postoperative rehabilitation protocols after ARCR. Five of 10 questions regarding standard rehabilitation reached a consensus statement. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was a trend toward later mobilization.

Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5 and 3 tesla [T]) to quantify glenoid bone loss in a cadaveric model compared with the current gold standard, 3D computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were used to create a bone loss model, leaving the surrounding soft tissues intact. The anteroposterior (AP) dimension of the glenoid was measured at the glenoid equator and after soft tissue layer closure the specimen underwent scanning (CT, 1.5-T MRI, and 3-T MRI) with the following methods (0%, 10%, and 25% defect by area). Raw axial data from the scans were segmented using manual mask manipulation for bone and reconstructed using Mimics software to obtain a 3D en face glenoid view. Using calibrated Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine images, the diameter of the glenoid at the equator and the area of the glenoid defect was measured on all imaging modalities. RESULTS: In specimens with 10% or 25% defects, no difference was detected between imaging modalities when comparing the measured defect size (10% defect P = .27, 25% defect P = .73). All 3 modalities demonstrated a strong correlation with the actual defect size (CT, ρ = .97; 1.5-T MRI, ρ = .93; 3-T MRI, ρ = .92, P < .0001). When looking at the absolute difference between the actual and measured defect area, no significance was noted between imaging modalities (10% defect P = .34, 25% defect P = .47). The error of 3-T 3D MRI increased with increasing defect size (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Both 1.5- and 3-T-based 3D MRI reconstructions of glenoid bone loss correlate with measurements from 3D CT scan data and actual defect size in a cadaveric model. Regardless of imaging modality, the error in bone loss measurement tends to increase with increased defect size. Use of 3D MRI in the setting of shoulder instability could obviate the need for CT scans. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The goal of our work was to develop a reproducible method of determining glenoid bone loss from 3D MRI data and hence eliminate the need for CT scans in this setting. This will lead to decreased cost of care as well as decreased radiation exposure to patients. The long-term goal is a fully automated system that is as approachable for clinicians as current 3D CT technology.

Variability in Outcome Reporting for Operatively Managed Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of variability in outcomes assessed after surgery for anterior shoulder instability in recent high-impact literature. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an extensive review of the literature during a 5-year period from January 2011 through December 2015 was performed across 6 orthopaedic journals with high impact factors to identify all studies investigating outcomes after anterior shoulder instability. Studies reporting clinical outcomes for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability after surgical treatment with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Several metrics were collected from each manuscript: (1) range of motion (ROM), (2) quantitative strength, (3) physical examination testing, (4) imaging, (5) patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (6) complications (including recurrent instability), (7) patient satisfaction, and (8) return to preinjury level of activity or sport. Variability in outcome measures was then qualitatively assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included for final analysis ranging from Level I to IV evidence. Fifty-nine percent reported ROM, and 18% measured strength. Other clinical exam maneuvers were assessed in 44%, with 40% assessing apprehension. Imaging was used in 62%, including X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans. On average, 2.25 PROs were assessed. In total, 28 different PROs were used to assess outcomes. The 3 most commonly reported PROs were the Rowe scale at 46%, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index at 31%, and the Constant Shoulder Score at 26%. Twenty-five percent included patient satisfaction in their assessment of outcomes. Recurrence was assessed by 59%, and return to preinjury level of activity was reported by 37% of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in outcome reporting for high-impact anterior shoulder instability literature with 28 different outcome tools used, making it difficult to compare outcomes between studies. Agreeing upon a uniform measure to assess outcomes would allow for clearer interpretation of the literature as well as the potential to draw conclusions from pooled data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Pectoralis major transfer for treatment of irreparable subscapularis tear: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Irreparable ruptures of the subscapularis tendon lead to impaired function of the shoulder and presents a surgically complex problem. Transfer of the pectoralis major tendon has been reported as a possible treatment option. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the outcomes of pectoralis major transfers for the treatment of irreparable subscapularis tears. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using search of electronic databases. No language restrictions were applied. Case reports, review articles, and operative techniques without outcome data were excluded. All the outcomes reported by each study were analyzed and when possible, data were pooled to generate frequency-weighted values to summarize outcomes. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total 195 shoulders were included in this systematic review. The mean age of patients was 58.8 years (range 18-81 years) and the mean follow-up was 33.4 months (range 6-80 months). Constant scores improved from a mean pre-operative score of 37.8 ± 6.8, to a mean postoperative score of 61.3 ± 6.5 (p < 0.0001). Pain scores could not be pooled as different scales were used. Nevertheless, a trend in pain reduction was noted in all papers. Functional outcomes were less favorable in patients with massive rotator cuff tears or previous shoulder replacements. Moreover, the Constant scores were significantly higher in patients following subcoracoid transfer of the pectoralis major tendon compared to patients who received supracoracoid transfer (p < 0.001). The overall reported incidence of postoperative nerve palsy is low (one transient musculocutaneous nerve palsy and one axillary nerve dysfunction out of 195 cases). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review based on frequency-weighted means demonstrated improvement in shoulder function, strength and pain relief after pectoralis major transfer for irreparable subscapularis tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Female athlete triad screening in Canadian Interuniversity Sport universities: analysis of the pre-participation evaluation form.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to examine inclusion of screening questions related to female athlete triad in the Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS) pre-participation evaluation (PPE) forms. We hypothesized that the current CIS PPE forms are not comprehensive screening tools for identifying athletes at risk for the female athlete triad. METHODS: All 48 English-speaking CIS universities were invited to participate in the study. Via e-mail, a copy of the PPE form was requested from team physicians and certified athletic trainers. Two reviewers evaluated the PPE forms for inclusion of the 12 items recommended by the Female Athlete Triad Coalition for primary screening for the triad. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 48 CIS universities responded (81%). The majority of the universities (97%), required a PPE for incoming athletes. Only 9 universities (24%) had 6 or more of the 12 recommended screening items included in their forms, whereas 26 universities (70%) included 4 or less items. Three universities (8%) did not address any of the recommended questions. Questions related to disordered eating were often absent in the collected PPEs. In 10 universities (27%), PPE forms were completed by the athlete alone. The remaining 27 (73%) universities required the form to be completed by the athlete in conjunction with a therapist, physician, or both. CONCLUSIONS: PPE forms used by CIS universities have limited ability to identify athletes at risk of the triad-based on the recommendations of the Coalition. Furthermore, there is a lack of uniformity of the PPE forms within the CIS.

Clinical outcomes following revision anterior shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally surgeons have treated failed shoulder instability with open capsulolabral repair. Despite improved instrumentation, technique and familiarity in shoulder arthroscopy, few studies have reported the outcomes of arthroscopic revision shoulder instability repair. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients following revision shoulder arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral stabilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients (63 shoulders) with failure of primary instability repairs were treated with revision arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization at a mean follow-up of 46.9 ± 16.8 months (range 18-78). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog pain scale and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. In addition, patients were queried for recurrent instability events (subluxation or dislocation) or revision surgery. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability normalized score was 80.1 ± 18.7 (range 15.0-100). There were clinically significant improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores and ten-point visual analog scale for pain (P < 0.001). Recurrent instability occurred in 12 shoulders (19.0 %), with number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity found to be significant risk factor for failure (P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Revision arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder can result in satisfactory outcomes in appropriately selected patients who have failed previous capsulolabral repair. An increased number of prior surgeries and hyperlaxity are predictive of poor outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Case series, LOE IV.

Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon.

The functional importance of the long head of the biceps tendon is a source of debate. Despite the controversy concerning its functional role, the long head of the biceps tendon is a recognized pain generator in the shoulder. Because long head of the biceps tendinopathy is commonly associated with other shoulder pathologies, a thorough assessment and examination are critical to making the correct diagnosis and choosing a management plan. If nonsurgical treatment has failed, biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis can provide pain relief. Biceps tenodesis is reserved for young, higher demand patients; requires more rehabilitation time; and has a higher cost. All-arthroscopic proximal tenodesis and distal open subpectoral tenodesis have advantages and disadvantages. Although recent midterm reports suggest slightly better revision and complication rates with subpectoral tenodesis, more studies are needed to verify these findings. Persistent shoulder symptoms after biceps tenodesis commonly occur secondary to missed or untreated associated shoulder pathologies but also may result from mechanical failure of the tenodesis.