Impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study uses four institutional data. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven breast cancer, diagnosed BM with gadolinium-enhanced MRI, a Karnofsky performance status of 60 or higher, and radiotherapy for all BM lesions between 2017 and 2022. Patients with leptomeningeal dissemination were excluded. Concurrent ADC was defined as using ADC within four weeks before or after radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of SRN until December 2023 with death as a competing event was compared between the groups with and without concurrent ADC. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: Among the 168 patients enrolled, 48 (29%) received ADC, and 19 (11%) had concurrent ADC. Of all, 36% were HER2-positive, 62% had symptomatic BM, and 33% had previous BM radiation histories. In a median follow-up of 31 months, 18 SRNs (11%) were registered (11 in grade 2 and 7 in grade 3). The groups with and without concurrent ADC had 5 SRNs in 19 patients and 13 SRNs in 149, and the two-year cumulative incidence of SRN was 27% vs. 7% (P = 0.014). Concurrent ADC was associated with a higher risk of SRN on multivariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.3], P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that concurrent ADC and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of SRN in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Classification of Patients With Painful Tumors to Predict Response to Palliative Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors affecting pain response to develop a patient classification system for palliative radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our prospective observational study (UMIN000044984) provided data on patients who received palliative RT for painful tumors. The eligibility criteria were having a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 2 or more before treatment and receiving palliative RT between August 2021 and September 2022. Post-RT follow-up was scheduled prospectively at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints criteria, with the primary outcome being the response rate within 12 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting pain response and develop the classification system. Each class evaluated the differences in response rate, time to response, and progression. RESULTS: Of the 488 registered lesions, 366 from 261 patients met the criteria. Most patients had bone metastases (75%), of whom 72% were using opioids and 22% underwent reirradiation. Conventional RT (eg, 8-Gy single fraction, 20 Gy in 5 fractions) was administered to 93% of patients. Over a median of 6.8 months of follow-up, the average NRS decreased from 6.1 to 3.4 at 12 weeks for 273 evaluable lesions, with a 60% response rate. Opioid use and reirradiation negatively affected the response rate in multivariate analysis (P < .01). Lesions were categorized into class 1 (no opioid use and no reirradiation; 89 lesions), class 2 (neither class 1 nor 3; 211 lesions), and class 3 (opioid use and reirradiation; 66 lesions), with respective response rates of 75%, 61%, and 36% (P < .001). Time to response was similar across the classes (P = .91), but the progression rates at 24 weeks differed (11%, 27%, and 63%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid use and reirradiation are factors leading to significant variations in pain response rates and time to progression.

Palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer: a single center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with painful non-bone lesions who underwent conventional palliative radiotherapy between September 2018 and September 2022. The treatment targets included primary tumor lesions, lymph node metastases, non-bone hematogenous metastases, and other lesions. The primary endpoint was the overall pain response rate in evaluable patients, determined based on the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoint criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, pain recurrence, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 420 screened patients, 142 received palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions, and 112 were evaluable. A pain response was achieved in 67 patients (60%) of the 112 evaluable patients within a median of 1.2 months. Among these patients, 25 exhibited complete response, 42 partial response, 18 indeterminate response, and 27 pain progression. The median survival time was 5.5 months, recorded at a median follow-up of 6.0 months, during which 67 patients died. Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status scores of 2-4, opioid use, and re-irradiation as independent factors associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving a pain response. Pain recurrence occurred in 18 patients over a median of 4.1 months. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 adverse events, while none experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSION: Palliative radiotherapy can potentially be a safe and well-tolerated modality for managing painful non-bone lesions, with a low rate of adverse events.

Re-irradiation spine stereotactic body radiotherapy following high-dose conventional radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE:  We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) following high-dose conventional radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Twenty-one patients met the following eligibility criteria: with an irradiation history of 50 Gy2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) or more, diagnosed MESCC in the cervical or thoracic spines, and treated with re-irradiation SBRT of 24 Gy in 2 fractions between April 2018 and March 2023. Prior treatment was radiotherapy alone, not including surgery. The primary endpoint was a 1-year local failure rate. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Since our cohort includes one treatment-related death (TRD) of esophageal perforation, the cumulative esophageal dose was evaluated to find the dose constraints related to severe toxicities. RESULTS:  The median age was 68, and 14 males were included. The primary tumor sites (esophagus/lung/head and neck/others) were 6/6/7/2, and the median initial radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy2 EQD2 (range: 50-105 Gy2, 60-70/ > 70 Gy2 were 11/4). Ten patients underwent surgery followed by SBRT and 11 SBRT alone. At the median follow-up time of 10.4 months, 17 patients died of systemic disease progression including one TRD. No radiation-induced myelopathy or nerve root injuries occurred. Local failure occurred in six patients, with a 1-year local failure rate of 29.3% and a 1-year OS of 55.0%. Other toxicities included five cases of vertebral compression fractures (23.8%) and one radiation pneumonitis. The cumulative esophageal dose was recommended as follows: Dmax < 203, D0.035 cc < 187, and D1cc < 167 (Gy3 in biological effective dose). CONCLUSION:  Re-irradiation spine SBRT may be effective for selected patients with cervical or thoracic MESCC, even with high-dose irradiation histories. The cumulative dose assessment across the original and re-irradiated esophagus was recommended to decrease the risk of severe esophageal toxicities.

Changing trends in gamma knife surgery to linear accelerator brain stereotactic radiotherapy in Japan: a survey based on the nationwide claims database.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the trends in the platform for stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain (SRT), utilizing the open data of the National Database published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed data from FY2014 to FY2021. The practices included in the study were gamma knife surgery (GKS) and SRT with a linear accelerator (LINAC). The total number of outpatient and inpatient cases in each SRT system was evaluated annually. RESULTS: From April 2014 to March 2022, the study included 212,016 cases (102,691 GKS and 109,325 LINAC) of the registered 1,996,540 radiotherapy cases. In the first year, 13,117 (54.1%) cases were GKS, and 11,128 (45.9%) were LINAC; after that, GKS decreased, and LINAC increased, reaching the same rate in FY2017. Compared to the first year, the final year showed 11,702 GKS (- 1415 or - 10.8%) and 17,169 LINAC (+ 6041 or + 54.3%), with an increase of 4626 total SRT cases to 28,871 (+ 19.1%). The percentage of outpatient treatment also increased from 4.6 to 11.8% for GKS and from 44.7 to 57.9% for LINAC. CONCLUSION: The study found a gradual decrease in the selection of GKS, an increasing trend in the selection of LINAC, and an increase in the overall number of stereotactic irradiations. In particular, the proportion of outpatient treatment increased, indicating that more than half of LINAC was selected for outpatient treatment.

Retrospective non-inferiority study of stereotactic radiosurgery for more than ten brain metastases.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with > 10 brain metastases (BM) compared to patients with 2-10 BM. METHODS: The study included multiple BM patients who underwent SRS between 2014 and 2022, excluding patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy, had a Karnofsky Performance Status score < 60, suspected leptomeningeal disease, or a single BM lesion. Patients were divided into two groups (2-10 and > 10 BM groups) and matched 2:1 based on propensity scores. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the matched dataset, with intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoint. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the adjusted hazard ratio was below 1.3. RESULTS: Of the 1042 patients identified, 434 met eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (160 in the BM 2-10 group and 80 in the > 10 BM group). The median OS was 18.2 months in the 2-10 BM group and 19.4 months in the > 10 BM group (P = 0.60). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.59-1.24), indicating non-inferiority. PFS was not significantly different between the groups (4.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.94). The number of BM did not significantly impact OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for selected patients with > 10 BM was non-inferior in terms of OS compared to those with 2-10 BM in a propensity score-matched dataset.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: A study protocol.

Background: Currently, the standard curative treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, when the VT circuit is deep in the myocardium, the catheter may not be delivered, and a new, minimally invasive treatment using different energies is desired. Methods: This is a protocol paper for a feasibility study designed to provide stereotactic radiotherapy for refractory VT not cured by catheter ablation after at least one catheter ablation. The primary end point is to evaluate the short-term safety of this treatment and the secondary endpoint is to evaluate its efficacy as assessed by the reduction in VT episode. Cyberknife M6 radiosurgery system will be used for treatment, and the prescribed dose to the target will be 25Gy in one fraction. The study will be conducted on three patients. Conclusion: Since catheter ablation is the only treatment option for VT that is covered by insurance in Japan, there is currently no other treatment for VT/VF that cannot be cured by catheter ablation. We hope that this feasibility study will provide hope for patients who are currently under the stress of ICD activation. Trial registration: The study has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs042230030).