Effect of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan on QT/QTc Interval and Pharmacokinetics in HER2-Positive or HER2-Low Metastatic/Unresectable Breast Cancer.

HER2-targeted anticancer therapies may be associated with cardiovascular adverse events. This study evaluated effects of the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201a) on QT/QTc interval and its pharmacokinetics. Patients with heavily pretreated, metastatic HER2-expressing breast cancer were enrolled at seven study sites in Japan. T-DXd was administered intravenously at 6.4 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end points were baseline-adjusted QTcF interval and pharmacokinetics parameters. Key secondary end points included safety events, serum concentration of T-DXd and DXd at the time of electrocardiographic measurements, and antitumor activity parameters. Among 51 total patients, 47 (92.2%) had HER2-low breast cancer (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization-negative/equivocal/missing). Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single dose of T-DXd were consistent with previous studies. After multiple doses, T-DXd showed moderate accumulation (accumulation ratio (cycle 3/cycle 1), 1.35), but DXd showed minimal accumulation (1.09). The upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for mean ΔQTcF interval was < 10 ms at all timepoints, and at mean maximum serum concentration was also < 10 ms. Based on concentration-QT analysis, ΔQTcF increased with increasing concentrations of T-DXd and DXd. No clinically meaningful QTcF prolongation was observed. T-DXd had a manageable safety profile and showed antitumor activity in HER2-low breast cancer. In this study, a T-DXd dose of 6.4 mg/kg, higher than the 5.4-mg/kg dose currently approved for breast cancer, was not associated with clinically relevant QTcF prolongation in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-expressing metastatic breast cancer. This study adds to our understanding of T-DXd for treatment of HER2-low breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of geriatric assessment in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer: an integrated analysis of two randomized phase III trials (JCOG1115-A).

OBJECTIVE: Patients' actual age and performance status do not always accurately identify the 'fit elderly' for chemotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether four geriatric assessment tools could predict prognosis. METHODS: This study were analyzed using the data of two randomized phase III trials (JCOG0207 and JCOG0803/WJOG4307L) for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and included all eligible patients who were assessed before treatment with four geriatric assessment tools: the Barthel activities of daily living index, Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Geriatric Depression Scale-15. Univariable and multivariable analyses for overall survival, adjusted for baseline factors, were performed using a stratified Cox regression model with treatment regimen as strata. RESULTS: This analysis included 330 patients aged 70-74, 75-79 or 80 or more (n = 95/181/54), with a performance status of 0 or 1 (n = 119/211). Patients were divided into three groups based on Mini-Mental State Examination and two groups based on Geriatric Depression Scale, but over 80% of patients had perfect scores for both activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. In overall survival subgroup analyses by GA tool, only Mini-Mental State Examination scores were associated with substantial outcome differences (median survival times: 21.2, 13.5 and 12.2 months for scores 30, 29-24 and ≤23). After adjusting for baseline factors, the Mini-Mental State Examination, sex and performance status were tended to be worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: MMSE scores, performance status and sex, but not chronological age, effectively predicted the prognosis of elderly patients. Further studies should confirm that the Mini-Mental State Examination is useful for determining the indication of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study on docetaxel plus bevacizumab or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for treatment of elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with previously untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1323.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of bevacizumab monotherapy in elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The efficacy of the combinations for elderly patients was explored. METHODS: Untreated patients (≥75 years; performance status 0-1) with stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were included. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements were eligible even if they received tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel (50 mg/m2) (DB) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) (PB) with bevacizumab (15 m/kg). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Overall, 103 patients (DB: n=51; PB: n=52) were enrolled. In the DB and PB arms, median ages [range] were 78 [75-88] and 79 [75-94] years, respectively; median PFS were 6.1 and 4.6 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-1.61]; and response rates were 43%, and 40%, respectively (P=0.840). Grade ≥3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and fatigue incidences were significantly higher in the DB arm. Febrile neutropenia incidence did not differ significantly (16% vs. 12%, P=0.578). One patient in the PB arm died from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Quality of life (QoL) analysis revealed less deterioration in the PB arm. CONCLUSIONS: In previously untreated elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC, PB shows feasibility, better QoL, and promising efficacy in terms of PFS, and an objective response rate for further analysis (UMIN000012786).

Portal Vein Thrombosis in a Patient with Hereditary Antithrombin Deficiency.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been reported in many patients with and without liver cirrhosis. The portal vein is a rare site of thrombosis, and various conditions can predispose an individual to PVT. Among those conditions, hereditary thrombophilia has been increasingly reported recently. We herein report the case of a non-cirrhotic 30-year-old man who developed acute PVT with hereditary antithrombin deficiency. Antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy was required along with heparin. Given our experience with this case, we believe that a screening test for prothrombotic disorders, such as AT deficiency, should be considered in cases of PVT.

Feasibility study of first-line chemotherapy using Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab for advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: TORG1015.

BACKGROUND: The addition of bevacizumab to cytotoxic agents prolongs survival in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, there is no evidence to suggest that treatment with a cytotoxic agent plus bevacizumab is more effective than a cytotoxic agent alone for nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. We conducted a feasibility study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. METHODS: Major eligibility and exclusion criteria included: chemotherapy-naive status; non-fitness for bolus combination chemotherapy; stage III/IV or relapsed nonsquamous NSCLC; age ≥70; performance status 0-1; absence of brain metastasis; and no history of hemoptysis and thoracic irradiation. Pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) were administered intravenously on day 1, and repeated every 3 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the percentage of patients who completed ≥3 cycles. RESULTS: From October 2010 to April 2012, a total of 12 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity or treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients achieved PR, and the ORR was 25 %. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 months (95 % CI 1.1-8.8 months) and 13.6 months (95 % CI 5.3-15.6 months), respectively. Seven of 12 patients (58 %) received ≥3 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in the treatment of elderly patients with nonsquamous NSCLC was well tolerated and shows promise as first-line treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004263 . Registered on 25 September, 2010.

Randomized controlled trial comparing docetaxel-cisplatin combination with weekly docetaxel alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0207†.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective trials specifically designed for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer demonstrating the benefit of platinum-based therapies are still lacking. This trial was designed to clarify whether the addition of cisplatin to monotherapy could improve survival for elderly patients. METHODS: Elderly patients (age ≥70 years, ECOG performance Status 0-1) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 (docetaxel plus cisplatin) or docetaxel 25 mg/m(2) on the same schedule (docetaxel). Both regimens were repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six patients were enrolled. Sixty-three were randomly assigned docetaxel plus cisplatin and 63 docetaxel monotherapy. Median age was 76 years (range 70-88). The second planned interim analysis was performed on 112 assessable patients (docetaxel/docetaxel plus cisplatin: 56/56). Although the formal criterion for stopping the trial was not met, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended study termination on ethical grounds based on the interaction (two-sided P = 0.077, hazard ratios for ≤74/≥75: 0.23/0.72) between age and subgroup and treatment arm, which suggested that docetaxel may not represent an adequate control arm regimen for the age subgroup of 70-74 years. CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of study results is limited due to early stopping. Further study is needed to confirm survival benefit of platinum-based chemotherapy for elderly non-small-cell lung cancer [UMIN-CTR (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) ID: C000000146].

[Awareness about medical expenses and certifications of eligibility for limited health insurance payments for chemotherapy among clinicians at the Ehime Cancer Care Network Priority Hospitals (Ehime Cancer Kyoten Hospitals)].

The "Cancer Chemotherapy and its Management" subcommittee at the Ehime Cancer Care Network Priority Hospitals (Ehime Cancer Kyoten Hospitals)with a focus on medical expenses associated with chemotherapy, surveyed awareness among 98 clinicians regarding certifications of eligibility for Limited Health Insurance Payments during cancer treatment. This committee also lists social and clinical problems encountered at the Ehime Cancer Care Network Priority Hospitals. In our survey, 78% of clinicians were consulted about medical expenses associated with chemotherapy and were actively involved in resolving medical expense problems and resulting correspondences. However, only 38% of clinicians could explain the details of the Japanese guideline on the catastrophic cap and the certifications of eligibility for Limited Health Insurance Payments. This knowledge deficit was more pronounced in younger residents. From our analyses of the awareness about medical expenses among clinicians, we recommend the establishment of the following systems for the management of cancer patients. First, establish a reporting system and early consultation on the catastrophic cap and the certifications of eligibility before initiating cancer treatment. Second, education regarding medical expenses should be mandatory for clinicians, especially for young residents. Third, patients with cancer suffering in the interval of the medical expense and the social system should be relieved with new systems.

Factor associated with failure to administer subsequent treatment after progression in the first-line chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience.

PURPOSE: Early administration of both epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. We investigated the effect of first-line administration of these therapies on subsequent therapy in NSCLC patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 63 consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC and good performance status (PS) and who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI therapy or standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and then had progressive disease, from 2007 to 2011. The ability of each patient to receive the other therapy after first-line treatment failure was assessed. RESULTS: In the first-line setting, 23 and 40 patients received EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, respectively. At relapse, the EGFR-TKI therapy group showed more frequent PS deterioration (p = 0.042) and greater likelihood of symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) relapse (p = 0.093) compared with the cytotoxic chemotherapy group. Nine (39 %) of 23 patients initially receiving EGFR-TKI therapy could not receive standard cytotoxic therapy after progression mainly due to symptomatic CNS relapse. Only one (3 %) of 40 initially treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy failed to receive subsequent EGFR-TKI therapy (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a correlation between the first-line therapy and the failure to switch to the other therapy after disease progression (OR 48.605, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who could not receive both EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in the early-line setting were included more in the first-line EGFR-TKI group, suggesting a potential risk associated with missing the timing of administration of subsequent therapy. Further investigation is warranted to detect their pretreatment clinical or molecular characteristics for development of a new treatment strategy specific for such subpopulation.

Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with etoposide and cisplatin plus concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (JCOG0202): a randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Four cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin and accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard of care for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Irinotecan plus cisplatin significantly improved overall survival compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive-stage SCLC. We compared these regimens for overall survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC. METHODS: We did this phase 3 study in 36 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included age 20-70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ functions. Eligible patients with previously untreated limited-stage SCLC received one cycle of etoposide plus cisplatin (intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3; intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) plus AHTRT (1.5 Gy twice daily, 5 days a week, total 45 Gy over 3 weeks). Patients without progressive disease following induction therapy were randomised (1:1 ratio, using a minimisation method with biased-coin assignment balancing on ECOG performance status [0 vs 1], response to induction chemoradiotherapy [complete response plus near complete response vs partial response and stable disease], and institution) to receive either three further cycles of consolidation etoposide plus cisplatin or irinotecan plus cisplatin (intravenous irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15; intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1). Patients, physicians, and investigators were aware of allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival after randomisation; primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144989, and the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000095. FINDINGS: 281 patients were enrolled between Sept 1, 2002, and Oct 2, 2006. After induction etoposide plus cisplatin and AHTRT, 258 patients were randomised to consolidation etoposide plus cisplatin (n=129) or irinotecan plus cisplatin (n=129). In the etoposide plus cisplatin group, median overall survival was 3.2 years (95% CI 2.4-4.1). In the irinotecan and cisplatin group, median overall survival was 2.8 years (95% CI 2.4-3.6); overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% CI 0.80-1.46], one-sided stratified log-rank p=0.70). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (120 [95%] in the etoposide plus cisplatin group vs 101 [78%] in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group), anaemia (44 [35%] vs 50 [39%]), thrombocytopenia (26 [21%] vs six [5%]), febrile neutropenia (21 [17%] vs 18 [14%]), and diarrhoea (two [2%] vs 13 [10%]). There was one treatment-related adverse event leading to death in each group (radiation pneumonitis in the etoposide plus cisplatin group; brain infarction in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group). INTERPRETATION: Four cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin and AHTRT should continue to be the standard of care for limited-stage SCLC. FUNDING: National Cancer Center and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Quality of gastric cancer care in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of process-of-care quality indicators (QIs) that would cover a wide range of gastric cancer care modalities and to examine the current state of the quality of care provided by designated cancer care hospitals in Japan. DESIGN: A retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Eighteen designated cancer care hospitals throughout Japan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1685 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Provision of care to eligible patients as described in the 29 QIs, which were developed using an adaptation of the RAND/UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) appropriateness method by a panel of nationally recognized experts in Japan. RESULTS: Overall, the patients received 68.3% of the care processes recommended by the QIs. While 'deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis before major surgery' was performed for 99% of the cases, 'documentation before endoscopic resection' was completed for only 12% of the cases. The chemotherapy care was less likely to meet the QI standards (61%) than pre-therapeutic care (76%), surgical treatment (66%) and endoscopic resection (71%; overall difference: P < 0.001). A comparison based on the types of care showed that documentation and patient explanation were performed less frequently (60 and 53%, respectively) than were diagnostic and therapeutic processes as recommended in the QIs (85%; overall P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although many required care processes were provided, some areas with room for improvement were revealed, especially with respect to chemotherapy, documentation and patient explanation. Continuous efforts to improve the quality and develop a system to monitor this progress would be beneficial in Japan.

Lung-cancer related chest events detected by periodical follow-up CT after stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I primary lung cancer: retrospective analysis of incidence of lung-cancer related chest events and outcomes of salvage treatment.

PURPOSE: Follow-up by chest CT is often performed routinely after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer. We investigated how often periodical chest CT detected lung-cancer related chest events (failure in the chest, new primary lung cancer), and how often chest CT follow-ups led to curative intent salvage treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 90 stage I primary lung cancers in 86 patients received SBRT. In principle, chest CT was scheduled every 2-3 months in the first two years, and every 3-4 months thereafter. RESULTS: Median time to follow-up by chest CT was 26 months (1-61 months). Twenty-seven lung-cancer related chest events were detected by periodical chest CT after SBRT. The three-year lung-cancer related chest event free rate was 62 %. It was possible to apply curative-intent salvage treatment to 56 % of the lung-cancer related chest events. The two-year overall survival rate was 66 % among the 13 patients who received curative-intent salvage treatment (radiotherapy, 11; surgery, 2). CONCLUSION: Post-SBRT lung-cancer related chest events (as detected by periodical chest CT) were not uncommon (approximately 40 % at 3 years from SBRT), and it was possible to treat more than half of these lesions with curative-intent salvage treatment.

Factors affecting the local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors including primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors.

PURPOSE: To identify factors affecting local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors including primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and June 2009, 159 lung tumors in 144 patients (primary lung cancer, 128; metastatic lung tumor, 31) were treated with SBRT with 48-60 Gy (mean 50.1 Gy) in 4-5 fractions. Higher doses were given to larger tumors and metastatic tumors in principle. Assessed factors were age, gender, tumor origin (primary vs. metastatic), histological subtype, tumor size, tumor appearance (solid vs. ground glass opacity), maximum standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose, and SBRT doses. RESULTS: Follow-up time was 1-60 months (median 18 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local failure-free rates of all lesions were 90, 80, and 77 %, respectively. On univariate analysis, metastatic tumors (p < 0.0001), solid tumors (p = 0.0246), and higher SBRT doses (p = 0.0334) were the statistically significant unfavorable factors for local control. On multivariate analysis, only tumor origin was statistically significant (p = 0.0027). The 2-year local failure-free rates of primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors were 87 and 50 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A metastatic tumor was the only independently significant unfavorable factor for local control after SBRT.

Factors affecting survival time after recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Dose-fractionation schedules of palliative or salvage radiotherapy (RT) for recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are various because they highly depend on patient prognosis. For optimal selection of dose-fractionation schedules, factors affecting survival time after recurrence were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2005, 115 patients with stage III NSCLC received curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Among these patients, 74 underwent recurrence and were reviewed. Evaluated factors were age at recurrence, gender, initial stage, histological subtype, initial radiation-field size, recurrent patterns (locoregional alone vs. distant ± locoregional), time to recurrence (≤6 vs. >6 months), and treatment for recurrence (chemotherapy, RT). RESULTS: Median follow-up time after recurrence was 7 (range 0-59) months. One- and 2-year overall survival rates after recurrence were 28 and 11%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, time to recurrence (p = 0.0001) and administration of chemotherapy for recurrence (p = 0.0190) were the independently significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence was the most significant factor for survival after post-CCRT recurrence of NSCLC. Administration of chemotherapy for recurrence was also a significant factor, whereas RT for recurrence was not significant. When RT was given to patients with post-CCRT recurrence of NSCLC, dose-fractionated schedules should be determined considering these factors.

Randomized phase II study of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II study (JO19907) compared the efficacy and safety of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) alone with bevacizumab-CP in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Chemonaïve patients with stage IIIB, IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive bevacizumab-CP or CP alone. Chemotherapy was repeated for up to 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab recipients who completed ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy could continue bevacizumab as monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: After confirming the tolerability of bevacizumab-CP in a small number of patients, 180 patients were recruited, of whom 121 were assigned to bevacizumab-CP and 59 to CP alone. Hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.61 with bevacizumab-CP versus CP alone (p=0.0090; median 6.9 versus 5.9 months). Objective response rate was significantly higher with bevacizumab-CP than with CP alone (60.7% versus 31.0%; p=0.0013). Median overall survival was >22 months in both treatment groups (HR 0.99; p=0.9526). No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSION: Study JO19907 met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that the addition of bevacizumab to first-line CP significantly improves PFS in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This prolonged PFS by bevacizumab did not translate into OS benefit with the extremely longer underlying survival compared to historical data. No new safety signals were identified in this population. (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center [JAPIC] registration number: CTI-060338).

Quality-of-life evaluation for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison between vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in a randomized trial: Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00-03 (BRI LC03-01).

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel (VGD) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer showed no difference in overall survival (median survival time: 13.6 versus 14.1 months) between the two treatment groups. We report here the results of quality-of-life (QOL) study initiated in the mid-course of this randomized trial. METHODS: The patients themselves assessed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Lung (FACT-L), FACT-Taxane and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spirituality (FACIT-Sp) QOL instruments at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 weeks after the treatment. The primary endpoint was a comparison of total QOL score for each assessment instrument between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients from the trial (VGD, 34; PC, 34) who submitted baseline questionnaires and at least one questionnaire over the course of treatment were eligible. Longitudinal analysis showed a significant difference in slope of the FACT-Taxane score (p = 0.004) between treatment regimens over time, but no difference was found in FACT-L score (p = 0.311) and FACIT-Sp score (p = 0.466) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The significant difference in slope of FACT-Taxane score favored the VGD regimen. These data should be considered in treatment decision-making for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00242983.

Benefits and adverse events among elderly patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 0007.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy may be offered to selected elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group (OLCSG) 0007 trial with patients up to 75 years showed that with concurrent RT, docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) chemotherapy was an alternative to mitomycin C, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) chemotherapy. METHODS: Of the 99 patients in the DP arm, 73 were younger than 70 years and 26 were 70 years or older. Of the 101 patients in the MVP arm, 75 were younger than 70 years and 26 were 70 years or older. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using an early period weighted log-rank test. Toxicities and treatment intensities were compared by χ(2) and t tests, respectively. RESULTS: OS and PFS tended to be longer in the DP arm versus MVP arm: median OS (months), 27.5 versus 22.9 (p = 0.109) and 25.6 versus 23.4 (p = 0.064) in the ≥70-year and <70-year groups, respectively; median PFS (months), 19.0 versus 11.5 (p = 0.175) and 12.0 versus 9.3 (p = 0.132) in the ≥70-year and less than 70-year groups, respectively. Severe toxicity (neutropenia, esophagitis, and pneumonitis) rates did not differ between age groups. Nevertheless, the absence of statistically significant differences in this retrospective analysis might be due to the small number of patients. Radiation intensity was similar between the groups, but chemotherapy intensity was lower in the ≥70-year group. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with concurrent RT may be effective and tolerable in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study of amrubicin and topotecan combination therapy in patients with relapsed or extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0401.

BACKGROUNDS: Chemotherapy is a mainstay in the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), although the survival benefit remains modest. We conducted a phase II trial of amrubicin (a topoisomerase II inhibitor) and topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed SCLC patients. METHODS: Amrubicin (35 mg/m(2)) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 3-5 and 1-5, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was set as the primary endpoint, which was assessed separately in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (chemotherapy-naïve 31, relapsed 28). The ORRs were 74% and 43% in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Survival data were also promising, with a median progression-free survival time and median survival time of 5.3 and 14.9 months and 4.7 and 10.2 months in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Even refractory-relapsed cases responded to the treatment favorably (27% ORR). The primary toxicity was myelosuppression with grades 3 or 4 neutropenia in 97% of the patients, which led to grades 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia in 41% of the patients and two toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: This phase II study showed the favorable efficacy and moderate safety profiles of a topotecan and amrubicin two-drug combination especially in relapsed patients with ED-SCLC.

A phase I study of S-1 with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with localized advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, is effective against advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mild toxicity and synergistic effects with radiation in preclinical trials. In this phase I study, we evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of S-1 for a future phase II study when administered concurrently with thoracic radiation (total dose of 60 Gy at 2 Gy per daily fraction) in elderly patients (>75 years old) with localized advanced NSCLC. S-1 was administered on days 1-14 and 29-42 at the following dosages: 60, 70, and 80 mg/m(2)/day. Twenty-two previously untreated patients were enrolled in this study. Dose-limiting toxicity included febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, and pneumonitis. One patient had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. No other patient experienced radiation pneumonitis or esophagitis exceeding grade 2. The recommended dose for S-1 was determined to be 80 mg/m(2)/day, which produced an overall response rate of 75% (n=12). The median progression-free survival time was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval: 7.1-15.8 months) with a median follow-up time of 27.9 months. These results indicate that concurrent treatment with S-1 and thoracic radiation is a feasible option for NSCLC in the elderly. A phase II study is currently under way.

Clinical implication of the antidiuretic hormone (ADH) receptor antagonist mozavaptan hydrochloride in patients with ectopic ADH syndrome.

Ectopic antidiuretic hormone syndrome is a medical emergency characterized by dilutional hyponatremia. Clinical effectiveness of the vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist mozavaptan was evaluated in 16 patients. In short-term (7-day) treatment with the drug, serum sodium concentration (mean ± standard deviation) significantly (P = 0.002) increased from 122.8 ± 6.7 to 133.3 ± 8.3 mEq/l, and symptoms due to hyponatremia were improved. On the basis of these results, mozavaptan (Physuline(®)) was approved as an orphan drug for the treatment of the syndrome in 2006 in Japan. During the 43 months following its launch, 100 patients have been treated with the drug; overall clinical effects of the drug were found similar to those of this clinical trial. Clinically, mozavaptan may allow hyponatremic patients to be treated by aggressive cancer chemotherapy with platinum-containing drugs. Moreover, the drug may free patients from strict fluid-intake restrictions and thereby improve their quality of life.