Is the presence of home entrance steps associated with community participation of people with mobility impairments?

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how home entrances are related to community participation for people with mobility impairments. OBJECTIVE: This investigation explored how the need to navigate steps at the entrance of a home affects the community participation levels of people with mobility impairments. METHODS: This survey study used pre-measure data collected from three different samples. Participants were adults living independently in the community aged 18-94 years old who self-reported having a mobility impairment. Measures included the Brief Community Engagement Questionnaire to examine potential differential effects on the number of non-discretionary trips people make into the community (e.g., getting groceries, medications) versus the number of discretionary activities (e.g., socializing outside the home) people reported over seven days. RESULTS: People with mobility impairments were less likely to report a stepped entrance than people without MI, but when the entrance they use the most had steps they reported significantly higher exertion to use the entrance. The presence of steps had no effect on non-discretionary trips (p = .74), but was associated with 49% (p < .01) fewer discretionary activities reported by people with mobility impairment relative to those without MI. CONCLUSION: Steps at the home entrance of people with mobility impairment may be an important mediating factor in their level of participation. When researchers and practitioners evaluate interventions that aim to increase community participation of people with mobility impairment, they should control for the presence of steps at their home entrance.

A comparative analysis of Center for Independent Living staff and board of directors regarding CIL services and consumer participation.

Community living of people with disabilities spans independent living and community engagement. Consumer choice and control of their level of community participation requires community accessibility, resources and supports. Some people with disabilities have difficulties procuring and maintaining these resources. Centers for Independent Living (CIL) are advocacy and service agencies that have been empowering consumers to meet their needs for over 40 years. Despite this history, little is known about the value of CIL services for increasing community participation of people with disabilities. We administered the CIL Participation Service Survey to 420 CIL staff members and 107 CIL board members to examine their opinions about the relative value of different CIL services for increasing community participation of their consumers. Results indicated that both staff and board members have very high regard for the value and quality of CIL services. The Independent Living (IL) philosophy of consumer choice and control was among the most highly rated aspects of CIL service delivery for both staff and board members. Overall, staff and board member responses were very consistent in terms of the top-rated strengths and weaknesses of CIL services for increasing participation among consumers. Differences appeared to reflect the daily staff focus on specific consumer need versus board members' view of larger community issues.