Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 25(12): 1001-1006, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255524

RESUMO

Antibiotic stewardship (AS) improves patient outcomes and rates of antibiotic susceptibilities. However, the long-term effect of AS programs (ASPs) on mortality is unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of bedside interventions by an AS team (AST) on clinical and microbiological outcomes. This retrospective study enrolled patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) and long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (more than 7 days). The main outcomes were 30-day and in-hospital mortality of patients with BSI. The secondary outcomes were the day of therapy (DOT) and susceptibility of antipseudomonal agents. Cases were classified into two groups: the pre-ASP group comprised cases between 2011 and 2013 and the post-ASP group, between 2014 and 2016. The outcomes were then compared between the two groups. Among the patients with all BSI (n = 1187), no significant differences in 30-day mortality were observed between those in the pre-ASP and post-ASP groups. However, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the post-ASP group than that in the pre-ASP group (24.8% vs. 18.0%; P = 0.004). Furthermore, the 30-day and in-hospital mortality of resistant gram-negative bacteraemia was significantly lower (20.4% vs.10.5%; P = 0.04 and 28.0% vs.16.1%; P = 0.03). The DOT of broad-spectrum antibiotics decreased except that of tazobactam/piperacillin. The susceptibilities of tazobactam/piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, sulbactam/cefoperazone, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin levofloxacin, imipenem and meropenem were significantly better. Interventions by the AST can improve the clinical and microbiological outcomes, especially resistant gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, this effect of our ASP can continue for a long term.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/organização & administração , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Humanos , Japão , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMJ Open Qual ; 8(2): e000666, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259289

RESUMO

Objectives: Serious adverse effects, including arrhythmia and cardiac arrest, result from rapid intravenous high concentration of potassium chloride (KCl). We aimed to eliminate prescription of undiluted KCl and encourage dilution of KCl to 400 mEq/L and 40 mEq/L in the intensive care units (ICUs) and general and outpatient departments, respectively. Methods: Before the first intervention, we collected data regarding high-concentration KCl and interviewed representatives of physicians prescribing high-concentration KCl. Based on the guidelines in other countries on safely used concentrations of KCl (400 mEq/L), we negotiated with physicians to dilute KCl below 400 mEq/L. In the first intervention, we made rules based on surveys above. In the second intervention, we revised the rules based on opinions from physicians and pharmacists and investigated the change in the number of prescriptions of KCl concentration in each department. Continuing efforts with the safety manager ensured compliance of the rules by physicians and nurses in all departments. Results: After the first and second interventions, prescriptions for undiluted KCl in ICUs and general wards were eliminated (median=0). Prescriptions for <400 mEq/L KCl increased to 110 (median) after the first intervention and to 137 (median) after the second. In the general ward, 7 months after the first intervention, prescriptions for <400 mEq/L KCl had not increased. Compliance with our rules was high, and more than 72% of physicians and nurses were aware of the rules. Conclusions: The rules for administration of high-dose KCl successfully eliminated prescription of undiluted KCl, which was maintained using two plan-do-study-act cycles. Our intervention process could be useful in countries where prediluted formulations are unavailable or where prescriptions are not matched and undiluted ampules are used.


Assuntos
Administração Intravenosa/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Cloreto de Potássio/normas , Administração Intravenosa/métodos , Administração Intravenosa/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Japão , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Cloreto de Potássio/uso terapêutico
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 25(6): 458-462, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30803878

RESUMO

Patients with invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) generally have a high mortality rate, and resistance to antifungal drugs and the high costs associated with it have led to recent problems, necessitating the appropriate use of antifungals. To this end, we launched Antifungal Stewardship Programs (AFSPs) in our hospital. Patients who were systemically administered antifungals from January 2011 to December 2016 were enrolled this study and divided into pre-intervention and intervention groups. No significant difference was observed in defined daily doses per 1000 patient-days (23.3 ± 8.0 vs 20.4 ± 10.8, p = 0.251) between the groups. The monthly average for the days of therapy per 1000 patient-days was significantly lower in the intervention group (15.1 ± 3.1 vs 12.7 ± 4.3, p = 0.009). The cost of the antifungals reduced over the 3-year period by $260,520 (13.5%). Furthermore, a decreasing trend was observed in both the 30-day mortality (40.9% vs 30.0%, p = 0.414) and in-hospital mortality (63.6% vs 36.7%, p = 0.054) in patients with candidemia. Our results indicate that AFSPs are efficacious and cost-effective approaches.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Antifúngicos/economia , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/economia , Redução de Custos , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/economia , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/microbiologia , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/mortalidade , Japão/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...