[Anesthetic Magagement of Emergency Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Due to Massive Bleeding during Esophageal Cancer Operation].

A 69-year-old male patient with esophageal cancer underwent video assisted subtotal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (50 Gy). Adhesion between esophagus and the aorta was so severe that the aortic arch was damaged and massive bleeding occurred during manipulation of the esophagus. However, as we had expected and prepared for the incident, we successfully managed it and emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair could be performed by cardiac surgeons immediately. Preanesthetic careful consideration and preparation for surgical incidents are necessary for anesthesiologists.

Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for long-term sedation in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia. Secondary endpoints were withdrawal symptoms, rebound effects, the duration of sedation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≤ 0 relative to the total infusion time of dexmedetomidine, and the dose of additional sedatives or analgesics. METHODS: Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h was continuously infused for maintaining RASS ≤ 0 in patients requiring sedation in the ICU. Safety and efficacy of short-term (≤ 24 h) and long-term (>24 h) dexmedetomidine administration were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-five surgical and medical ICU patients were administered dexmedetomidine. The incidence of hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia that occurred after 24 h (long-term) was not significantly different from that occurring within 24 h (short-term) (P = 0.546, 0.513, and 0.486, respectively). Regarding withdrawal symptoms, one event each of hypertension and headache occurred after the end of infusion, but both were mild in severity. Increases of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate after terminating the infusion of dexmedetomidine were not associated with the increasing duration of its infusion. The ratio of duration with RASS ≤ 0 was ≥ 85 % until day 20, except day 9 (70 %) and day 10 (75 %). There was no increase in the dose of additional sedatives or analgesics after the first 24-h treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term safety of dexmedetomidine compared to its use for 24 h was confirmed. Dexmedetomidine was useful to maintain an adequate sedation level (RASS ≤ 0) during long-term infusion.

Volatile anesthetics constrict pulmonary artery in rabbit lung perfusion model.

Volatile anesthetics are generally considered to possess a vasodilator action. Some of their actions on pulmonary vessels, however, are not clearly understood. We examined the effects of various volatile anesthetics on pulmonary vessels using an in situ rabbit isolated-lung perfusion model. We prepared a rabbit constant-flow lung-perfusion model by sending blood to the pulmonary artery and removing blood from the left atrium, and observed the changes in pulmonary arterial perfusion pressure caused by inhalation of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) volatile anesthetics: halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane, in random order. These volatile anesthetics increased pulmonary arterial perfusion pressure in a dose-dependent manner and caused the pulmonary arteries to constrict. In particular, halothane at all concentrations induced significantly greater pulmonary vasoconstriction than the other volatile anesthetics. Therefore, it is suggested that volatile inhalation anesthetics induce the pulmonary arteries to constrict, and halothane exhibits the most potent pulmonary vasoconstrictor effect among the volatile anesthetics tested.