Risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths in Japanese patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a postmarketing survey.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis was conducted to clarify risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths reported during a postmarketing survey of irinotecan. METHODS: The survey covered all patients treated with irinotecan in Japan between April 1995 and January 2000. The patient background data and adverse drug reactions were collected through case report forms. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses including 14 explanatory variables were performed to determine the risk factors for grade 3-4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea for all patients and subgroups with five major cancers. Treatment-related deaths were also analyzed. RESULTS: Case report forms of 13 935 patients (94.1% of 14 802 patients registered) treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy were collected. Major grade 3-4 adverse drug reactions were leukopenia (34.8%), thrombocytopenia (12.4%) and diarrhea (10.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors (odds ratio ≥1.5) common for all these three adverse drug reactions were performance status (≥3), infection and renal dysfunction before starting irinotecan therapy. Additionally, the risk factors for leukopenia were being female and prior radiotherapy, those for thrombocytopenia were age (≥65 years), while those for diarrhea were pleural effusion and watery stool. The risk factors in each cancer were also identified. The incidence of treatment-related death was 1.3% (176). Myelosuppression-related deaths accounted for 70% and interstitial lung disease for 11% of all treatment-related deaths. Being male, age, performance status ≥3, massive ascites and infection and renal dysfunction were identified as risk factors for treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure the safety of irinotecan therapy, it is important to select appropriate patients by considering the risk factors.

Clinical efficacy of long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor laninamivir octanoate hydrate in postmarketing surveillance.

Laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) is a long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor which requires only a single inhaled dose to fully treat infection by the influenza virus. In Japan, this drug was launched in October 2010 as a new treatment for the influenza virus. A postmarketing surveillance study was conducted in the 2010/2011 influenza season to assess the efficacy of this drug in clinical settings. For 3542 patients evaluated for efficacy (type A, n = 3179; type B, n = 342, unknown type, n = 3), including the day of drug administration, the median duration to fever resolution was three days, and the median duration to relief from influenza symptoms was four days. Based on the judgment of participating physicians, the efficacy rate was 97.6 % for type A influenza, 93.3 % for type B influenza, and 100 % in unknown types. "Treatment failure," as judged by participating physicians, was most closely correlated with the inhalation status of laninamivir. Despite laninamivir requiring only the administration of a single dose, it was confirmed to be an effective treatment in more than 90 % of patients with type A or type B influenza virus infections. This drug was considered to be useful for the treatment of influenza infections due to ease of use and its improvement of compliance. It became clear that the efficacy of laninamivir depended strongly on the status of inhalation, and thus careful and detailed instructions on the correct method of inhalation were considered to be important in order to obtain reliable therapeutic effects.

Safety of the long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor laninamivir octanoate hydrate in post-marketing surveillance.

Laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) is a long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) that completes treatment with only a single inhalation. It was launched in Japan in October 2010 as an anti-influenza agent. A post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in the 2010/2011 influenza season to assess the safety of this drug in clinical settings. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 50 patients (59 events) out of 3542 patients subjected to safety evaluation (incidence 1.41%). Commonly reported ADRs were psychiatric disorders (abnormal behaviour, etc.), gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhoea, nausea, etc.) and nervous system disorders (dizziness, etc.), with incidences of 0.48% (n=17), 0.45% (n=16) and 0.17% (n=6), respectively. No serious ADRs occurred. ADRs usually emerged on the day on which laninamivir was inhaled (52.5%) and ADRs emerged within 3 days after inhalation in >90% of adversely affected patients. ADRs resolved or improved within 3 days in >85% of patients. The incidence of adverse events involving abnormal behaviour was 3.1% (30/959) among patients <10 years of age, 0.7% (8/1088) among patients aged 10-19 years, 0.1% (2/1431) among adult patients aged 20-64 years and 0.0% (0/64) among patients aged ≥65 years. It was confirmed that laninamivir is unlikely to cause delayed ADRs or a prolonged duration of ADRs despite this drug being a long-acting NAI. Furthermore, the incidence of ADRs was not found to have increased compared with that observed during clinical trials, and the types of ADR observed during this study were similar to those previously observed. Thus, laninamivir octanoate hydrate was confirmed to have no noticeable problem with safety.

[Efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin in patients with urinary tract infections].

Sitafloxacin (STFX, Gracevit 50mg, fine granules 10%), a new quinolone antibacterial agent, was approved in January 2008, and the use-results survey was carried out over the 2 years between December 2008 and November 2010. We studied the efficacy and safety of STFX in 1,452 patients with urinary tract infections (cystitis, pyelonephritis, urethritis). The total efficacy rate for urinary tract infections was 91.4% (1,235/1,351 patients). Efficacy rates, classified by the type of infection, were: uncomplicated cystitis 95.9% (466/486 patients), complicated cystitis 87.2% (511/586 patients), uncomplicated pyelonephritis 96.1% (49/51 patients), complicated pyelonephritis 93.5% (145/155 patients), and urethritis 87.7% (64/73 patients). Efficacy rates were 86.0% (49/57 patients) for non-responders to cephems and 77.4% (48/62 patients) for non-responders to quinolones. The eradication rate of indicated strains was 90.5% (545/602 strains). The eradication rates of major causative bacteria were; Escherichia coli 92.7% (294/317 isolates), Enterococcus faecalis 86.0% (43/50 isolates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 66.7% (16/24 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae 95.2% (20/21 isolates), and Chlamydia trachomatis 88.9% (8/9 isolates). The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 2.71% (37/1,365 cases). Major ADRs were diarrhoea (0.88%, 12 cases) and hepatic function disorders (0.51%, 7 cases). A serious ADR (hepatic function abnormality) was observed in 1 case, and the hepatic function in this patient returned to normal after treatment with STFX was discontinued. In conclusion, these results suggest that STFX is a useful antibacterial agent with an efficacy rate of 91.4% against urinary tract infections, with a minimum efficacy rate of 87.2% (against complicated cystitis), and has no serious problems in its safety profile.

Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of all patients treated with irinotecan in Japan: clinical experience and ADR profile of 13,935 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The actual condition of drug utilization and the adverse drug reactions profile of irinotecan hydrochloride hydrate (irinotecan), an antitumor drug, were examined on the basis of all the case survey results from April 1995 to January 2000. METHODS: Drug utilization and the adverse drug reactions profile of irinotecan were figured out by checking of the patient conditions at the start of therapy and monitoring during on-therapy period in this survey. RESULTS: Among the 13 935 patients investigated, 32% had non-small cell lung cancer, 16% had colorectal cancer, 15% had ovarian cancer and 14% had small cell lung cancer, all principal cancers in which irinotecan was domestically approved for use. Most frequent regimens of each cancer were concomitant use with cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (38 and 46%, respectively), concomitant use with cisplatin or mitomycin for ovarian cancer (each 30%) and irinotecan alone for colorectal cancer (51%). The major (grade 3 or more) adverse drug reactions were myelosuppressions such as leukopenia (23.8 and 38.3% for lone and concomitant use, respectively) thrombocytopenia (6.5 and 14.3%) and gastrointestinal tract disorders such as diarrhea (10.2 and 10.0%). CONCLUSIONS: It was reconfirmed that the incidences of serious leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea were high among the patients with contraindication or careful administration of its use prescribed in the drug package insert. Therefore, for proper use of irinotecan, it is important to discriminate the patient on the basis of risk status.

[Study on the safety and efficacy of sitafloxacin--results of the use-results survey].

Sitafloxacin (STFX, Gracevit 50 mg, fine granules 10%), a new quinolone antibacterial agent, was approved in January 2008, and the use-results survey was performed for 2 years from December 2008 to November 2010. In total, 3558 case cards were collected from 287 medical institutions and 3331 cases were subjected to a safety evaluation and 3225 were subjected to an efficacy evaluation. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.44% (148/3331 cases). Major ADRs were diarrhea (55 cases) and hepatic function disorders (39 cases), and the incidences were 1.65% and 1.17%, respectively. Serious ADRs were observed in 5 cases (7 episodes); gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hepatic function abnormal, white blood cell count decreased, drug eruption, hypoglycemia, pneumonia, and superinfection in one case each. Efficacy rate was 92.9% (2997/3225 patients) in total with a range of 91.4 to 97.8% by type of infection such as respiratory tract and urinary tract. Eradication rate of indicated strains was 91.5% (808/883 strains) including Gram-positive bacteria at 92.3% (310/336 strains), Gram-negative bacteria at 90.7% (458/505 strains), anaerobes at 100.0% (28/28 strains) and atypical bacteria at 85.7% (12/14 strains). In conclusion, this use-results survey confirmed that STFX is a useful antibacterial agent with no serious problems in its safety profile and efficacy rates of over 90% against all infections.

[In vitro activity of sitafloxacin against clinical isolates in 2009].

In vitro activity of sitafloxacin (STFX) and various oral antimicrobial agents against bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens between January and December 2009, at different healthcare facilities in Japan was evaluated. A total of 1,620 isolates including aerobic and anaerobic organisms was available for the susceptibility testing using the microbroth dilution methods recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute. The minimum inhibitory concentration of STFX at which 90% of isolates (MIC90) was 0.06 microg/mL for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and was equal to that of garenoxacin (GRNX), 2 times lower than that of moxifloxacin (MFLX), and 8 times lower than that of levofloxacin (LVFX). STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae at 0.06 microg/mL or less. The MIC90s of STFX ranged from 0.03 to 0.06 microg/mL and were 1 to 2 times lower than those of GRNX, 2 to 4 times lower than those of MFLX, and 16 to 32 times lower than those of LVFX. Against Streptococcus pyogenes, the MIC90 of STFX was 0.06 microg/mL and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 4 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.25 microg/mL for Enterococcus faecalis, and was 2 times lower than those of GRNX and MFLX, and 8 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for E. coli was 2 microg/mL, and the MIC90s of other 10 species of Enterobacteriaceae which were the lowest values of the quinolones tested ranged from 0.03 to 1 microg/mL. The MIC90 of STFX for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from urinary infections was 8 microg/mL and was 16 times lower than those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for P aeruginosa isolates recovered from respiratory infections was 2 microg/mL and was 32 times lower than those of GRNX and MFLX, and 16 times lower than that of LVFX. STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Haemophilus influenzae at 0.004 microg/mL or less, and was 2 to 4 times lower than those of GRNX, 8 times lower than those of MFLX, and 4 times lower than those of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.008 microg/mL for Moraxella catarrhalis, and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 8 times lower than those of MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90s of STFX ranged from 0.015 to 0.12 microg/mL for all the species of anaerobic bacteria and were the lowest values of all the antimicrobial agents tested. In conclusion, the activity of STFX against Gram-positive cocci was comparable or superior to those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. STFX showed the most potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria of all the antimicrobial agents tested in this study.