Systematic Review of Definitions and Outcome Measures for Postoperative Ileus and Return of Bowel Function after Abdominal Surgery in Children.

This review aims to objectify which definitions and outcome measures are used for the return of bowel function and postoperative ileus in children. PubMed and Embase were systematically searched from inception to December 17, 2020. Prospective studies conducted in children (aged 0-18 years) undergoing gastrointestinal surgery which reported on definitions and/or outcome measures for post-operative ileus or return of bowel function were evaluated. Definitions and outcome measures were extracted. From 4,027 references, 71 articles were included. From the 17 articles mentioning postoperative ileus, 8 (47%) provided a definition. In total, 34 outcome measures were used and 12 were unique. "Abdominal distension" was the most reported (41%) measure. In 41%, the outcome measures only described the return of gastric motility, while 18% described the return of intestinal motility. The return of bowel function was mentioned in 67 articles, none provided a definition. In total, 133 outcome measures were used and 37 were unique. Time to oral intake was the most reported (14%) measure. In 49%, the outcome measures only described the return of gastric motility, while 10% described the return of intestinal motility. High variation in definitions and outcome measures has limited the generalizability of research into postoperative bowel function in children. Without standardization, it will be impossible to compare research results and evaluate treatments. In children, the return of gastric motility seemingly should get more focus compared to adults. Therefore, we believe that a definition of postoperative ileus with an accompanying core outcome set, developed by a multidisciplinary team, specifically for children is required.

Determining the Correct Resection Level in Patients with Hirschsprung Disease Using Contrast Enema and Full Thickness Biopsies: Can the Diagnostic Accuracy be Improved by Examining Submucosal Nerve Fiber Thickness?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative resection level in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) is determined by contrast enema, surgeon's intraoperative judgement and full thickness biopsy (FTB) identifying ganglia. This study aims to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema and FTB in determination of resection level and whether this can be improved by measuring submucosal nerve fiber diameter. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed contrast enema and intraoperative FTBs obtained in our center, determining diagnostic accuracy for level of resection. Gold standard was pathological examination of resection specimen. Secondly, we matched transition zone pull-through (TZPT) patients with non-TZPT patients, based on age and length of resected bowel, to blindly compare nerve fibers diameters between two groups using group comparison. RESULTS: From 2000-2021, 209 patients underwent HD surgery of whom 180 patients (138 males; median age at surgery: 13 weeks) with 18 TZPTs (10%) were included. Positive predictive value of contrast enema was 65.1%. No caliber change was found in patients with total colon aganglionosis (TCA). Negative predictive value of surgeon's intraoperative judgement and FTB in determining resection level was 79.0% and 90.0% (91.2% single-stage, 84.4% two-stage surgery) respectively. Mean nerve fiber diameter in TZPT was 25.01 µm (SD= 5.63) and in non-TZPT 24.35 µm (SD= 6.75) (p = 0.813). CONCLUSION: Determination of resection level with combination of contrast enema, surgeon's intraoperative judgement and FTB results in sufficient diagnostic accuracy in patients with HD. If no caliber change is seen with contrast enema, TCA should be considered. Resection level or transition zone cannot be determined by assessment of submucosal nerve fiber diameter in FTB. TYPE OF STUDY: clinical research paper.